IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [newtrk] Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic

Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu> Tue, 12 July 2005 12:26 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DsJpx-0004ph-8u; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 08:26:09 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DsJpt-0004on-LR for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 08:26:05 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA16272 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 08:26:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from brinza.cc.columbia.edu ([128.59.29.8] ident=cu41754) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DsKI5-0001lV-CK for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 08:55:14 -0400
Received: from [192.168.0.31] (pool-141-153-198-113.mad.east.verizon.net [141.153.198.113]) (user=hgs10 mech=PLAIN bits=0) by brinza.cc.columbia.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j6CCQ1UO019192 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 Jul 2005 08:26:02 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <42D3B6D4.30308@cs.columbia.edu>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 08:25:56 -0400
From: Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>
Organization: Columbia University
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: john.loughney@nokia.com
References: <1AA39B75171A7144A73216AED1D7478D6CE8E2@esebe100.NOE.Nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <1AA39B75171A7144A73216AED1D7478D6CE8E2@esebe100.NOE.Nokia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-No-Spam-Score: Local
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.48 on 128.59.29.8
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 68c8cc8a64a9d0402e43b8eee9fc4199
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu, blilly@erols.com, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [newtrk] Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Yes, this seems pretty close to the IETF DPW. Unfortunately, the draft 
has expired (I saw the report on the experiment, but even that seems 
rather preliminary, in that no actual action to HISTORIC has been 
taken). Is there a plan to act on the recommendation of 
draft-ietf-newtrk-cruft-00 in the foreseeable future?

> 
> Have you seen draft-ietf-newtrk-cruft-00?  It proposes something along
> these lines.
> 
> John


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email