IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF95 remote attendance

Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org> Fri, 15 April 2016 11:56 UTC

Return-Path: <jhall@cdt.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF7712D980 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 04:56:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cdt.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DW2YS3hDQVqt for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 04:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22f.google.com (mail-vk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19A5E12D8FB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 04:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id c4so143854010vkb.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 04:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cdt.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NGsm11kOBIIXiopYfrwu8Rc8w1PQ4QivOcSl60UxzfI=; b=FjUG+0oY2OBzp63iCgp1BACTjH7WVwFJ5gRcd5qcB6WCySW92raZda/vX3cTJQ/C+D KWCIq9dIyZnGoAScvi5eSAcGZc08tp8u/YLSDkLBmQqOcceAX79f3Vs6nQ/npdL8Gl2C wvQvlKbofCptRn0JoxkNYUFOjfIV34xbG5s8w=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NGsm11kOBIIXiopYfrwu8Rc8w1PQ4QivOcSl60UxzfI=; b=libVNp19KVrj0kWVEcxJ5EHuJ0VVyLBZZog5wsHu+bSLzuawgrz78EECTUI46a/0h/ Mi8tuakl9V3or3ezGtqtNRqL1JNqPHQvjMsNiWEJCYggUB01IYCb0px3x7Ok0Pv90xjW HLfC0UEw6GpD6c4z1Vw8EI8Ow9zFFMa3u4/sVpxF3oTVBKXofr+XXqaBUKi9btPgh97z MhUl0TCMI8E3COeFK7uDrGISTI65HO/RT9NVb9550uG+FQbNhetqXfthn7hAesBV1xiN jzvFAabH7o3OkXNy8eXFu6EN5Dg54+NdGD3Nc4NlM5aLWKE0Y/mGtkNK+bzK2JXq4P6U LZhA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUS4GWjtXe6FordhJGE8cvrAJeTC+kMUqnaocDO0CZ1SMMwHvStrJ9AXkAPfJA8cWjb4pPsFV+BuzEHkxwL
X-Received: by 10.31.151.75 with SMTP id z72mr9706137vkd.104.1460721389167; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 04:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.94.3 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 04:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5710CE07.9090104@gmail.com>
References: <5710CA7F.3050207@meetecho.com> <5710CE07.9090104@gmail.com>
From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 07:56:09 -0400
Message-ID: <CABtrr-W4bmaG2vEEokbwCLED2P9_eiEgmeM2zHO8-RQUt7BZ0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF95 remote attendance
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/mx--LkeljfrRc9jR0GiYlI-Ommk>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>, vmeet@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 11:56:31 -0000

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 7:18 AM, Stewart Bryant
<stewart.bryant@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 15/04/2016 12:03, Meetecho IETF support wrote:
>>
>> - 712 unique remote participants joined Meetecho through the week; among
>> these, 282 opted to also put their Registration ID.
>
>
> There was something odd about the registration number system.
>
> I tried to enter my registration number a few times but it rejected it every
> time.
>
> Since it did not REQUIRE(sic)  the registration number  I just used the
> option not to enter it.

I had to enter "Joseph Hall" instead of "Joe Hall" to get it to take my Reg. ID.

-- 
Joseph Lorenzo Hall
Chief Technologist, Center for Democracy & Technology [https://www.cdt.org]
e: joe@cdt.org, p: 202.407.8825, pgp: https://josephhall.org/gpg-key
Fingerprint: 3CA2 8D7B 9F6D DBD3 4B10  1607 5F86 6987 40A9 A871

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email