IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: More nroff questions

Steve Bellovin <smb@research.att.com> Wed, 10 March 1999 17:00 UTC

Received: by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) id MAA13960 for ietf-outbound.10@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 12:00:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail-green.research.att.com (mail-green.research.att.com [135.207.30.103]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA13842 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:52:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from postal.research.att.com (postal.research.att.com [135.207.23.30]) by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DECC1E01E; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:52:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from postal.research.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postal.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA11486; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:52:21 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199903101652.LAA11486@postal.research.att.com>
To: Graham Klyne <GK@Dial.pipex.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: More nroff questions
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:52:21 -0500
From: Steve Bellovin <smb@research.att.com>

Graham Klyne wrote:
> 
> I have recently come to some appreciation of the extent of work that is
> applied to turn an Internet Draft into an RFC, and that being able to
> submit an 'nroff' version to the RFC editor would probably ease the
> publication process for both author and editor.
> 
> 
> (2) Are there any utilities for doing an (initial) conversion from other
> formats (e.g. RTF or word processor formats) to nroff?

Also see http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hain-msword-template-00.txt,
if you're of the MS Word religion.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email