Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-eastlake-rfc5342bis-03

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 13 June 2013 16:07 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627E121F9A1F; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 09:07:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.505
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.505 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.094, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D3e8ie6I1Bz6; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 09:07:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4575A21F925A; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 09:07:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F0EC2CC56; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 19:07:21 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0rA1p9X8DA4y; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 19:07:21 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAADB2CC61; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 19:07:20 +0300 (EEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-eastlake-rfc5342bis-03
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE712980CA213@MX15A.corp.emc.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 19:07:19 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4DC72F40-E427-4F50-9CA9-73F5C89F2E2C@piuha.net>
References: <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE712980C9EA5@MX15A.corp.emc.com> <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE712980CA206@MX15A.corp.emc.com> <CAF4+nEER=JdeKV6PU_8m2jJ8O182WHcsQ-ayODUTCp1jRx-X+w@mail.gmail.com> <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE712980CA213@MX15A.corp.emc.com>
To: David Black <david.black@emc.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, joe.abley@icann.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:07:37 -0000

> I'm concerned about readers who aren't as
> cognizant of and comfortable/familiar with the relationships among
> OUIs and the identifiers based on them as people like you and me.

Thanks your review, David. The Gen-ART reviews are important for me in helping decide if the documents may have issues where I need to dig in deeper.

In this case I agree with the issue you raise and think it is a mistake that should be corrected. I see that Barry has already raised a discuss about that, however. I am balloting a No-Objection based on your review.

Jari