Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us> Tue, 15 August 2006 15:40 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GD12C-0000No-0v; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:40:52 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GD12A-0000ME-5G for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:40:50 -0400
Received: from zeke.toscano.org ([69.31.8.124] helo=zeke.ecotroph.net) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GD121-0003OE-UA for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:40:50 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([::ffff:208.50.38.5]) (AUTH: LOGIN anewton) by zeke.ecotroph.net with esmtp; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:40:40 -0400 id 015880CC.44E1EAF8.0000714D
Message-ID: <44E1EAEF.3030505@hxr.us>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:40:31 -0400
From: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
References: <E1GCknR-0004hD-Jt@stiedprstage1.ietf.org> <44E1D050.F9A@xyzzy.claranet.de>
In-Reply-To: <44E1D050.F9A@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7baded97d9887f7a0c7e8a33c2e3ea1b
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Frank Ellermann wrote: > Some general questions about this draft: > > 1 - Has anybody implemented it ? Yes. See http://iris.verisignlabs.com/blojsom/blog/iris/ > 2 - If so, do test servers exist for client developers ? Yes. See above. Additionally, see the archives of the CRISP wg. > 3 - Why is LWZ limited to UDP, desperately trying to solve > various size issues with delated XML and other tricks ? TCP is handled by XPC and BEEP. But for very short and quick answers (and lots of them, such as domain availability checks) UDP is better. Don't know what you mean by tricks, but the deflation is optional. > Other nits: Reference [5] RFC 2396 isn't state of the art. > [2] Unicode version 3 is unclear, XML 1.0 third ed. apparently > uses 3.2 (?), and it requires UTF-8 and UTF-16, as repeated in > the I18N considerations (chapter 5). Maybe the RFCs for UTF-8 > and UTF-16 should be referenced if that's explicitly mentioned, > that boils down to "MUST accept (and for UTF-16 send) a BOM". > > s/draft-ietf-crips/draft-ietf-crisp/ and s/-00// (that typo is > also in the common-transport draft pointing back to [9} LWZ). > > s/3891/3981/ in both drafts. All good catches. Thanks. > Example A.1 contains elements <salt> and <md5>, what is this ? Those are in the http://example.com namespace, and this is just an example extension. Perhaps it would be clearer if the example just had text content saying "example extension". -andy _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protoc… Frank Ellermann
- Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protoc… Andrew Newton
- Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protoc… Marcos Sanz/Denic
- Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protoc… Ted Hardie
- Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protoc… Sam Hartman
- Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protoc… Frank Ellermann
- Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protoc… Frank Ellermann
- Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protoc… Andrew Newton
- Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protoc… Andrew Newton
- Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protoc… Sam Hartman
- Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protoc… kent crispin
- Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protoc… Lars Eggert
- Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protoc… Andrew Newton
- Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protoc… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protoc… william(at)elan.net
- Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protoc… Todd Glassey
- Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protoc… Ted Faber
- Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protoc… Ted Faber
- Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protoc… Randy Presuhn
- Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protoc… Andrew Newton
- Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protoc… Ned Freed
- Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protoc… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protoc… Mark Townsley
- Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protoc… Sam Hartman