Internet Monthly Report - November 1993

Ann Cooper <cooper@isi.edu> Wed, 15 December 1993 18:45 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07714; 15 Dec 93 13:45 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07698; 15 Dec 93 13:45 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13385; 15 Dec 93 13:45 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07652; 15 Dec 93 13:45 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07516; 15 Dec 93 13:41 EST
Received: from zephyr.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13262; 15 Dec 93 13:41 EST
Received: from zephyr.isi.edu by zephyr.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-16) id <AA12681>; Wed, 15 Dec 1993 10:41:33 -0800
Message-Id: <199312151841.AA12681@zephyr.isi.edu>
To: Internet-Research-Group:;
Cc: ietf@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Internet Monthly Report - November 1993
Reply-To: cooper@isi.edu
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1993 10:41:33 -0800
X-Orig-Sender: ietf-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Ann Cooper <cooper@isi.edu>


November 1993


INTERNET MONTHLY REPORTS
------------------------

The purpose of these reports is to communicate to the Internet Research
Group the accomplishments, milestones reached, or problems discovered by
the participating organizations.

     This report is for Internet information purposes only, and is not
     to be quoted in other publications without permission from the
     submitter.

Each organization is expected to submit a 1/2 page report on the first
business day of the month describing the previous month's activities.

These reports should be submitted via network mail to:

     Ann Westine Cooper (Cooper@ISI.EDU)

     NSF Regional reports - To obtain the procedure describing how to
     submit information for the Internet Monthly Report, send an email
     message to mailserv@is.internic.net and put "send imr-procedure" in
     the body of the message (add only that one line; do not put a
     signature).

Requests to be added or deleted from the Internet Monthly report list
should be sent to "imr-request@isi.edu".

     Details on obtaining the current IMR, or back issues, via FTP or
     EMAIL may be obtained by sending an EMAIL message to "rfc-
     info@ISI.EDU" with the message body "help: ways_to_get_imrs".  For
     example:

             To: rfc-info@ISI.EDU
             Subject: getting imrs

             help: ways_to_get_imrs




Cooper                                                          [Page 1]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTERNET ENGINEERING REPORTS  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page  3

  Internet Projects

     ANSNET/NSFNET BACKBONE ENGINEERING  . . . . . . . . . . . page  7
     BOLT BERANEK AND NEWMAN, INC.,  . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 12
     CICNET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 14
     INTERNIC  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 15
     ISI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 19
     MERIT/MICHNET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 23
     MERIT/NSFNET INFORMATION SERVICES . . . . . . . . . . . . page 25
     MRNET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 28
     NORTHWESTNET  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 29
     UCL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 30
     USER SERVICES REPORT  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 32

  CALENDAR OF EVENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 45
    Rare List of Meetings  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 46































Cooper                                                          [Page 2]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993



INTERNET ENGINEERING REPORTS
----------------------------

                  IETF MONTHLY REPORT for November, 1993

     1. The 28th meeting of the IETF was held in Houston, Texas the
        first week of November, and was very well attended by over 635
        registered attendees. The final numbers are not in yet, but it
        appears that the Houston meeting will be in the top three based
        on attendance. This meeting was hosted by the folks at SESQUINET
        and Rice University.

        At the open plenary on Thursday, there was a consensus that
        beginning with the Seattle IETF meeting, the IETF Secretariat
        will be publishing the proceedings electronically. Details on
        this will be provided, but are still being worked out by the
        Secretariat.


     2. The next meeting of the IETF will be held in Seattle, Washington
        from March 29 (registration reception on the 28th) through April
        1, 1994. This meeting is being hosted by NorthWestNet. Following
        the March 1994 meeting, the IETF will be in Toronto Canada from
        July 25-29 with the registration reception being held on Sunday,
        July 24.

        It looks like the IETF will be in the San Francisco Bay Area in
        the fall... no dates have been set, but the meeting will
        probably be in the first two weeks of November. Once the final
        arrangements have been made, the normal notifications will be
        sent to the IETF Announcement list.

        Remember that information on future IETF meetings can be always
        be found in the file 0mtg-sites.txt which is located on the IETF
        shadow directories.


     3. The IESG approved or recommended the following seven Protocol
        Actions during the month of November, 1993:

        o  Guidelines for Running OSPF Over Frame Relay Networks be
           published as an Informational RFC.

        o  Use of ISO CLNP in TUBA Environments be published as an
           Experimental Protocol.





Cooper                                                          [Page 3]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


        o  Telnet Environment Option as a Proposed Standard.

        o  Telnet Environment Option Interoperability Issues be
           published as an Informational RFC.

        o  Representing IP Information in the X.500 Directory be
           published as an Experimental protocol.

        o  DSA Metrics be published as an Informational RFC.

        o  Charting Networks in the X.500 Directory be published as an
           Experimental protocol.


     4. The IESG issued three Last Calls to the IETF during the month
        of November, 1993:

        o  The OSPF NSSA Option <draft-ietf-ospf-nssa-option-01> being
           considered as a Proposed Standard

        o  DECnet Phase IV MIB Extensions
           <draft-ietf-decnetiv-mibext-03> being considered as a Draft
           Standard

        o  TN3270 Current Practices
           <draft-ietf-tn3270e-current-pract-03.txt> being considered
           as an Informational Document


     5. A total of 27 Internet-Draft actions were taken during the month
        of November, 1993:

                 (Revised draft (o), New Draft (+) )

      (telnet)   o  Telnet Authentication: Kerberos Version 5
                    <draft-ietf-telnet-authker-v5-01.txt>
      (tuba)     o  Use of ISO CLNP in TUBA Environments
                    <draft-ietf-tuba-clnp-05.txt>
      (bgp)      o  Application of the Border Gateway Protocol in the
                    Internet <draft-ietf-bgp-application-03.txt>
      (ospf)     o  OSPF Version 2 Management Information Base
                    <draft-ietf-ospf-mib-01.txt>
      (x400ops)  o  Using the Internet DNS to maintain RFC1327 Address
                    Mapping Tables
                    <draft-ietf-x400ops-dnsx400maps-03.txt>






Cooper                                                          [Page 4]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


      (ipidrp)   o  IDRP for SIP <draft-ietf-ipidrp-sip-01.txt>
      (iplpdn)   o  Management Information Base for Frame Relay DTEs
                    <draft-ietf-iplpdn-frmib-dte-01.txt>
      (cat)      o  FTP Security Extensions
                    <draft-ietf-cat-ftpsec-04.txt>

      (frnetmib) o  Definitions of Managed Objects for Frame Relay
                    Service <draft-ietf-frnetmib-fr-05.txt>
      (ifmib)    o  Evolution of the Interfaces Group of MIB-II
                    <draft-ietf-ifmib-evolution-06.txt>
      (atm)      o  Default IP MTU for use over ATM AAL5
                    <draft-ietf-atm-mtu-05.txt>
      (madman)   o  Directory Monitoring MIB
                    <draft-ietf-madman-dsa-mib-07.txt>
      (pppext)   o  PPP Bridging Control Protocol (BCP)
                    <draft-ietf-pppext-for-bridging-02.txt>
      (thinosi)  o  Octet sequences for upper-layer OSI to support basic
                    communications applications
                    <draft-ietf-thinosi-cookbook-02.txt>
      (tn3270e)  o  TN3270 Current Practices
                    <draft-ietf-tn3270e-current-pract-03.txt>
      (pppext)   o  The PPP Multilink Control Protocol (MCP)
                    <draft-ietf-pppext-multilink-04.txt>
      (none)     o  An Extensible Message Format for Delivery Status
                    Notifications <draft-vaudreuil-mime-delivery-01.txt>
      (pppext)   o  The PPP NetBIOS Frames Control Protocol (NBFCP)
                    <draft-ietf-pppext-netbios-fcp-02.txt>
      (none)     o  SMTP Service Extensions for Transmission of Large
                    and Binary MIME Messages
                    <draft-vaudreuil-smtp-binary-02.txt>
      (none)     o  Text/Signature <draft-vaudreuil-mime-sig-01.txt>
      (none)     +  HTML+ (Hypertext markup format)
                    <draft-raggett-www-html-00.txt, .ps>
      (none)     +  SNMP Mid-Level-Manager MIB
                    <draft-levi-snmp-mid-level-mgr-00.txt>
      (none)     +  SNMP Script Language
                    <draft-levi-snmp-script-language-00.txt>
      (bgp)      +  BGP-4 protocol document roadmap and implementation
                    experience <draft-ietf-bgp-bgp4-implement-00.txt>
      (iiir)     +  Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) A Stateless
                    Search, Retrieve and Manipulation Protocol
                    <draft-ietf-iiir-http-00.txt, .ps>
      (sip)      +  IPAE: The SIPP Interoperability and Transition
                    Mechanism <draft-ietf-sip-ipae-transition-00.txt>
      (thinosi)  +  Use of upper-layer OSI protocols to support basic
                    communications applications
                    <draft-ietf-thinosi-profile-00.txt>




Cooper                                                          [Page 5]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


     6. There were 3 RFC's published during the month of November, 1993:

        RFC     St   WG        Title
        ------- --  --------   -------------------------------------
        RFC1544 PS  (822ext)   The Content-MD5 Header Field
        RFC1545 E   (none)     FTP Operation Over Big Address Records
                               (FOOBAR)
        RFC1546 I   (none)     Host Anycasting Service


     St(atus):  ( S) Internet Standard
                (PS) Proposed Standard
                (DS) Draft Standard
                ( E) Experimental
                ( I) Informational

     Steve Coya (scoya@cnri.reston.va.us)


































Cooper                                                          [Page 6]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


INTERNET PROJECTS
-----------------

ANSNET/NSFNET BACKBONE ENGINEERING
----------------------------------

     Network Status Summary
     ======================

     Four out of six steps comprising the T3 network upgrade (Phase-5)
     have been completed.  The remaining two steps required to finish
     the T3 hardware upgrade to the ANSnet will be completed in
     December.

     New Rcp_routed software was released on the T3 network to address
     performance improvements.  Gated software including support for
     BGP4 was released to Cornell for a future public release.  ANSnet
     test routers are peering with other networks on the BGP4 public
     test network.

     October Backbone Traffic and Routing Statistics
     ===============================================

     The total inbound packet count for the T3 network (measured using
     SNMP interface counters) was 44,687,182,575 on T3 ENSS interfaces,
     up 2.3% from October.  The total packet count into the network
     including all ENSS serial interfaces was 52,859,569,704 up 3.5%
     from October.  The maximum number of destinations announced to the
     T3 network during November was 13,886.

     T3 Network Upgrade Progress/Status
     ==================================

     During November (and the first week in December) we successfully
     completed four of the six steps that comprise a major upgrade to
     the T3 network (called "Phase-5 upgrade").  The major changes that
     will result from this upgrade are:

     o     Upgrade of all DS3/HSSI router serial interface adapters (T3
           CNSS and ENSS) to support full DS3 bandwidth.  The router
           adapter bus interface cards will also be upgraded to double
           the packet switching rates per interface.

     o     The architecture for interconnection among CNSS routers at
           each MCI POP location will be upgraded from point-to-point
           links to a common FDDI ring.





Cooper                                                          [Page 7]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


     o     The T3 DSUs on each DS3 interface will be replaced with a T3
           bandwidth manager (T3Plus BMX45) to accommodate each T3
           CNSS-CNSS circuit, and a Larscom Access-T45 DSU on each end
           of a T3 ENSS-CNSS circuit.

     o     New system software and microcode has been installed to
           support the increased adapter performance.  Routing software
           has already been deployed to support the new CNSS
           architecture.

     With the completion of 4 of the 6 deployment steps so far, we now
     have 10 backbone T3 links and 13 customer attachments running at
     full T3:

           Seattle - Denver Backbone Link
           Seattle - San Francisco Backbone Link
           San Francisco - Chicago Backbone Link
           San Francisco - Los Angeles Backbone Link
           Los-Angeles - Albuquerque Backbone Link
           Albuquerque - Houston Backbone Link
           Houston - Atlanta Backbone Link
           Atlanta - Greensboro Backbone Link
           Houston - St. Louis Backbone Link
           St. Louis - Chicago Backbone Link
           ENSS128 at Palo Alto (BARRnet, Stanford University)
           ENSS129 at Champaign (UIUC, CICnet)
           ENSS130 at Argonne (Argonne National Lab, CICNet)
           ENSS135 at San Diego (CERFnet, SDSC, etc.)
           ENSS138 at Atlanta (Georgia Tech, SURAnet)
           ENSS139 at Houston (Sesquinet, Rice University)
           ENSS140 at Lincoln (MIDnet, Westnet, etc.)
           ENSS141 at Boulder (Westnet, NCAR, U of Colorado, etc.)
           ENSS142 at Salt Lake City (WestNet, U of Utah, etc.)
           ENSS143 at Seattle (NorthWestNet, U of Washington, etc.)
           ENSS144 at Moffett Field (FIX-West)
           ENSS172 at Albuquerque (Phillips Laboratory)
           ENSS179 at Albuquerque (Sandia National Labs)

     Additionally, ENSS200 provided full T3 connectivity to the
     Supercomputing '93 conference in Portland and the Radiological
     Society of North America (RSNA) conference in Chicago during
     November.  The remaining steps are scheduled for December 11th and
     18th, at which point the Phase 5 upgrade will have been completed:

     Step    Date   Node  Location   Facility to be Upgraded
     -------------------------------------------------------
     5    12/11/93  E131  Cleveland  Ann Arbor ENSS and Cleveland POP
                    E132  Cleveland  Pittsburgh ENSS and Cleveland POP



Cooper                                                          [Page 8]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


                    E137  New York   Princeton ENSS and New York POP
                    ----  Chicago    3rd visit for Chicago-Cleveland
                                     link upgrade
                    ----  Denver     2nd visit for Denver-St. Louis
                                     link upgrade
                    ----  St. Louis  2nd visit for Denver-St. Louis
                                     link upgrade

     6    12/18/93  E133  Hartford   Ithaca ENSS and Hartford POP
                    E134  Hartford   Boston ENSS and Hartford POP
                    E136  Wash D.C.  College Park ENSS and Wash D.C.POP
                    E145  Wash D.C.  FIX-East ENSS and Wash D.C. POP
                    E146  Wash D.C.  DARPA ENSS and Wash D.C. POP
                    ----  Cleveland  2nd visit for Cleveland-Hartford
                                     link upgrade
                    ----  Greensboro 2nd visit for Greensboro-D.C.
                                     link upgrade
                    ----  New York   2nd visit for NY-Hartford
                                     link upgrade and for NY-D.C.
                                     link upgrade

     Rcp_routed Routing Software Changes
     ===================================

     Rcp_routed maintenance releases were deployed in November.  Early
     in November, the "Improved Efficiency" version was released.  A few
     subsequent performance enhancements have been deployed on ENSS144,
     ENSS145, and ENSS136 to address specific problems.  A memory leak
     has recently been identified and a fix will be deployed in early
     December.  Release notes are available for anonymous ftp at:
     ftp.ans.net:/pub/info/t3-rcp_routed/Release-Notes. Recent changes
     have been made to address the effects of high levels of external
     route flap, both the effects on ANSnet and the effects on ANSnet
     peer networks.

     Routing Stability Measured on the T3 Network
     ============================================

     Internal routing stability measurements are made by monitoring
     short term disconnect times (disconnects of five minutes duration
     or less).  This is intended as a measure of stability rather than
     complete connectivity.  November stability dropped to levels
     observed in July and August due to problems with rcp_routed.








Cooper                                                          [Page 9]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


            MONTH               overall              excluding configs
            ------              -------              -----------------
            January              99.1%                      99.5%
            February             99.0%                      99.5%
            March                97.5%                      99.1%
            April                96.1%                      97.2%
            May                  97.4%                      98.0%
            June                 95.5%                      96.6%
            July                 97.3%                      97.7%
            August               97.5%                      97.9%
            September            98.1%                      98.5%
            October              98.0%                      98.3%
            November             97.2%                      xx.x%

     The primary causes of instability during November were problems
     with rcp_routed, and equipment problems associated with new
     equipment deployed as part of the phase5 deployment.  ENSS136 saw
     almost 7 hours of instability mostly due to paging on the router as
     a result of a memory leak.  ENSS144 saw 2-1/2 hours of instability
     due to inefficiency associated with building EGP packets of over
     30KB for numerous EGP peer routers.  E143 experienced just over 2
     hour of instability due to equipment problems associated with the
     phase5 hardware deployment.  Other nodes experienced 30-90 minutes
     of instability due to phase5 deployment.  A few nodes continued to
     have local power problems.

     The number of nodes experiencing more than 30 minutes accumulated
     has been significantly reduced.  The vast majority of nodes had
     less than 15 minutes of accumulated instability over the course of
     the month.  The breakdown by sites is as follows (these figures
     include instabilities recorded during configuration runs):

        MONTH    >5 hr   >2 hr   > 1hr  >30 min   >15 min  <= 15min
                <98.7%  <99.7%  <99.87% <99.93%   <99.97%  >=99.97%

        ------------------------------------------------------------
        January      0       0       1       8        19        55
        February     0       0       1      24        19        41
        March        0       4      18      23        23        22
        April        2       2       3      13        12        57
        May          0       4      33      32        15         5
        June         3      21      35      18        12         3
        July         0      12      28      44         6         1
        August       1       5      28      21        17        15
        September    1      38      25      10         4        13
        October      0       3       3      10        25        50
        November     1       2      15      25        24        26




Cooper                                                         [Page 10]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


     There has been steady increase in the external route flap over the
     course of the year.  The measurement method is described in:

       ftp.ans.net:/pub/info/routing-stats/ExternalRouteFlapReports

     The number of times networks are announced as unreachable is
     collected.  The following represents the monthly totals in terms of
     number of networks declared unreachable per hour.

           January           844
           February          876
           March            1104
           April            1038
           May              1134
           June             1560
           July             1815
           August           1874
           September        2395
           October          2272
           November         2321

     Plots of the internal routing stability, external peer session
     stability and external route flap are available as the files:

       ftp.ans.net:/pub/info/routing-stats/internal.ps
       ftp.ans.net:/pub/info/routing-stats/external.ps
       ftp.ans.net:/pub/info/routing-stats/flap.ps

     Recent changes to rcp_routed have been designed to dampen route
     flap by deferring sending BGP updates slightly.  This also more
     effectively packs routes into BGP updates.  This work will be
     transferred to into Gated.  A document, soon to be submitted as an
     internet draft, describing this work is available as:

       ftp.ans.net:/pub/info/routing-stats/route-dampen.{txt,ps}

     Gated BGP4/CIDR Deployment Update
     =================================

     During November, ANS connected to the public BGP4 testnet and
     established external long-distance (non-tunneled) peer sessions
     with Cisco peers in Sweden and Alternet.  We also are peering with
     unix/Gated routers at Cornell and on the ANS internal testnet.  We
     are importing full routes, and exporting all AS690 routes to the
     public testnet in addition to our own internal testing.

     Our current plan is to deploy Gated BGP4 code on AS1133 routers
     (Ebone link between GIX and Geneva) by 15-December or sooner, and



Cooper                                                         [Page 11]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


     AS690 (ANSnet/NSFnet) routers by 15-January.  We have released the
     current snapshot of the BGP4 Gated code to Cornell and expect there
     will eventually be a public alpha release of BGP4/Gated code from
     them.  We are working with Merit to gather information, and develop
     CIDR-era routing plans for NSFnet peer networks.

     Notable Outages in November '93
     ===============================

     E138 (Atlanta) lost T3 connectivity due to circuit problems on
     11/15

     E136 (College Park) and E145 (Fix-East) suffered extended outages
     due to power failure on 11/16

     E135 (San Diego) suffered an extended outage due to site power
     maintenance on 11/21

     E141 (Boulder), E142 (Salt Lake) and E143 (Washington) underwent
     Phase V upgrade on 11/06

     E128 (Palo Alto), E130 (Argonne) and E144 (Fix West) underwent
     Phase V upgrade on 11/13

     E135 (San Diego) and E139 (Rice) underwent Phase V upgrade on 11/20

     E129 (Champaign), E138 (Atlanta) and E140 (Lincoln) underwent Phase
     V upgrade on 12/4

     Jordan Becker <becker@ans.net>

BOLT BERANEK AND NEWMAN INC.
----------------------------

     Scalability (September to November 1993)
     ----------------------------------------

     In September, BBN began a new Scalability effort that employs the
     toolset built during previous months.

     Under its Defense Simulation Internet (DSI) Engineering contract
     from ARPA (ASTO), BBN is tasked to study the issue of "scalability"
     from the perspective of network performance and functionality.  The
     Distributed Interactive Simulation (DIS) user community has
     ambitious goals for dramatically increasing the scale of simulated
     war-fighting exercises.  While the largest exercises to date have
     involved less than 1000 "entities" (tanks, planes, ships, etc.),
     planned future exercises may involve as many as 100,000.  Changes



Cooper                                                         [Page 12]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


     to both the DIS applications and the supporting network(s) will be
     necessary to accommodate this growth.

     Furthermore, application changes under consideration depend for
     their effectiveness on network functionality not yet generally
     available.  In particular, one traffic reduction scheme, called the
     "bi-grid" algorithm, uses geographic filtering to ensure that
     simulation hosts receive updates only from entities within the
     range of view of their own entities.  Implementation of this
     algorithm, however, depends on a wide-area network with advanced
     multicast routing functionality involving thousands of groups, very
     dynamic membership, and resource reservation.  Another
     application-level algorithm depends on the ability to send entity
     state updates to different hosts at different frequencies, a
     functionality that could be provided by "multi-level flows," one of
     the network algorithms developed under BBN's Real-Time Multicast
     Communications (RTMC) project, described previously in this report.

     BBN's objectives under the Scalability Task are to study the
     network requirements inherent in the goals of the DIS user
     community and recommend approaches and component technology for a
     scalable DSI.

     Since the start of this task in September, the first phase of the
     work has been focused on two approaches to requirements definition.
     The first is based on observation of actual DIS traffic on the
     current DSI.  The second is based on analysis of model scenarios
     being generated by Loral Advanced Distributed Simulation (LADS) to
     represent the network traffic expected from future DIS exercises.

     Previous DSI performance monitoring has been done primarily from a
     network perspective, i.e. at layer three or lower, involving only
     approximate correlation with specific user activities.
     Measurements were limited to packet throughput at network
     interfaces.  During October and November, a plan and procedures
     were developed to expand both the kinds of measurements to be done
     and the correlation of these measurements with events of the DIS
     exercise in progress.  First trials of a subset of the techniques
     took place during DIS demonstrations at the Interservice/Industry
     Training Systems and Education Conference (I/ITSEC).  A more
     extensive application is being planned for a Synthetic Theater of
     War (STOW) Engineering Demo in mid-December.  The basic approach is
     to combine SNMP-based monitoring of network interfaces, collection
     of actual traffic samples on site LANs, and end-to-end delay
     measurement using probe packets to get a rich characterization of
     both the DIS traffic and the performance of the DSI specific to
     this traffic.




Cooper                                                         [Page 13]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


     LADS' model scenarios provide as accurate a view as is available of
     future large-scale DIS exercises.  Among the characteristics of
     these models being derived are:

        Total required wide-area backbone bandwidth,
        Numbers of multicast groups required,
        Maximum number of groups subscribed to by each host,
        Frequency of group membership changes, and
        Group membership duration statistics.

     So far, only one model scenario has been thus analyzed.  Additional
     scenarios are expected from LADS in December.  Another type of
     analysis planned for these scenarios involves use of the DSI
     network simulator that BBN built as part of LADS "Scalability
     Toolset."  The traffic models derived from LADS' model scenarios
     will be used as input for this simulator to help determine
     effective architectures for the next generation DSI.  During
     November, auxiliary tools were built to facilitate analysis of
     simulator output.

     Inter-Domain Policy Routing
     ---------------------------

     During the month of November, we began laboratory testing of the
     new software for IDPR multicast and multipath routing.  We expect
     to continue laboratory testing during the month of December and to
     move our experiments out onto DARTNET in January.  We will release,
     in early 1994, an updated version of the IDPR protocol
     specification that includes the changes necessary to support
     multicast and multipath routing.

     Karen Seo <kseo@BBN.COM>

CICNET
-------

     In November, CICNet installed 56kb connections at Aurora
     University, Knox College, College View, Rockford University,
     Monmouth College, and Illinois Central College; added a T1
     connection to Loyola University's existing 56kb connection;
     installed 56kb Frame Relay connections at Lewis University, North
     Central, Rosary College, Chicago Medical School, the

     College of St. Francis, Moraine Valley Community College, Roosevelt
     University, and Saint Xavier; installed T1 connections at William
     Rainey Harper Community College; installed a T1 POP at Urbana-
     Champaign; and sold 10 SLIP dial-up connections.




Cooper                                                         [Page 14]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


     CICNet also announced $1.3 million in NSF funding for its Rural
     Datafication initiative.

     by Rhana Jacot (rjacot@cic.net>

INTERNIC
---------

     INFORMATION SERVICES

     Contact Information:

     Reference Desk Information
          Toll-free hotline     +1 800 444-4345
          email                 info@internic.net
          Fax                   +1 619 455-4640

     InterNIC Suggestions or Complaints
          Suggestions     suggestions@internic.net
          Complaints      complaints@internic.net

     NSF Network News
          newsletter subscriptions    newsletter-request@internic.net

     Listserv lists
          net-happenings   listserv@internic.net
          net-resources    listserv@is.internic.net
          nics             listserv@is.internic.net

     InfoSource
          Host Name        is.internic.net
          Host Address     192.153.156.15

     Postal address
          InterNIC Information Services
          General Atomics
          P.O. BOX 85608
          San Diego, CA 92186-9784

     NICLink
     -------

     InterNIC Information Services will release a special introductory
     issue of NICLink, a CD-ROM subscription product to be issued
     quarterly.  The NICLink CD will contain the InfoSource, the
     Information Services online information database that highlights
     the information resources of the Internet.  Additional information,
     images, electronic books, and software from the Internet will be



Cooper                                                         [Page 15]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


     included in  future issues.  The CD-ROM will be compatible with
     Macintosh, PC  Windows, and some UNIX configurations.  The software
     used to present  the data is Interleaf's WorldView, which
     incorporates full  database search functions as well as hypertext
     linking capabilities to  provide a powerful, easy-to-use interface.

     Contact the Information Services Reference Desk or the InterNIC
     Store on the InfoSource for details.

     NSF Network News
     ----------------

     The PostScript version of the _NSF Network News_ is now available
     on the InfoSource at is.internic.net under/InterNIC Information
     Services/ About InterNIC Information Services/"NSF Network News".
     The file is large (approximately 10 MB), including graphics and
     other sections unavailable in the ASCII version of the newsletter.

     An integral and popular part of the newsletter is the 6-page fold-
     out map of U.S.  Internet Connectivity sites. In the past, networks
     contributed statistics  on the number and identity of its regional
     connections and customers, as well as the number of dialup
     customers for inclusion in the Map. In order  to update the Map for
     future issues of the _NSF Network News_, updated statistics are
     needed from all network NICs. Networks which have contributed to
     past versions of the Map are:

     BARRNet
     CERFnet
     CICNET
     CONCERT
     JcNCnet
     Los Nettos
     MIDNET
     Merit/MichNet
     MRNet
     MCSAnet
     NEARnet
     NorthWestNet
     NSFNET Backbone Sites
     NYSERNet
     OARnet
     PREPnet
     PSCNET
     PSInet
     SDSCNET
     SESQUINET
     SURAnet



Cooper                                                         [Page 16]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


     THEnet
     UIUC/net
     VERnet
     WESTNET
     WiscNet

     Please contact the Publications Department of Information Services
     at +1 619 455-3941, +1 619 455-3934 or newsletter-
     comments@internic.net for more information on updating or adding
     your listing to the Internet Connectivity Map.

     Reference Desk
     --------------

     The following table gives a summary of the Reference Desk contacts
     for November.

               Method      Contacts      % of Total
               -------     --------      ---------
               Email           274          5.6
               Phone          4313         88.4
               Fax             279          5.7
               US Mail          12           <1
               Other             2           <1
               -------     --------      ---------
               Total          4880          100

     by Karen D. Frazer <kfrazer@is.internic.net>

     DIRECTORY AND DATABASE SERVICES

     InterNIC Directory and Database Services supports a database that
     can help you find conferences and seminars that might be of
     interest to you or your collegues.

     The list is accessible via Gopher (look for "InterNIC Directory and
     Database Services", then "InterNIC Database Services", and then
     "Conference and Seminar Announcements" on any of the InterNIC
     Gopher servers) or anonymous FTP (in the directory
     "/pub/conf.announce"). The list of conference announcements can
     also be searched using WAIS (the database name is
     "conference.announce" and the server is ds.internic.net) from your
     own WAIS client or by logging in as "wais" on our server,
     ds.internic.net.

     We scan a number of Internet mailing lists looking for conference
     announcements, and insert the announcements we find in the database
     (they are deleted after the conference is over).  If you are



Cooper                                                         [Page 17]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


     organizing a conference and would like to make sure that it is
     included in our list, you can email a copy of the conference
     announcement (in plain ASCII text) to conf@ds.internic.net.

     A reminder - if you would like to help the Internet community find
     a resource that you offer, send mail to admin@ds.internic.net and
     we will send information about listing your resource in the
     Directory of Directories.

     by Rick Huber <rvh@ds.internic.net>

     REGISTRATION SERVICES

     Significant Events

     During the month of November, the InterNIC received a significant
     amount of publicity from several sources this month.  In the early
     portion of November, an article was written in the Wall Street
     Journal and a television show called Computer Chronciles discussed
     the Internet.  Later on in the month, an article was published in
     the December 7, 1993 issue of PC Magazine.  All of these sources
     mentioned the InterNIC phone number and discusssed the value of
     using the Internet.  Theses advertisements caused a significant
     amount of referrals to Information Services since most callers
     wanted information on how to connect to the Internet.

     Registration Statistics November

     Hostmaster Email              3,011
     Postal/Fax Applications         219
     Telephone Calls               1,990
     Domain Registered               723
     Inverse Addresses               834
     Class C's Assigned            6,470
     Class B's Assigned              101
     ASN Assigned                     74


                      Connections         Retrievals
     Gopher Sessions    46,503               16,272
     Wais Sessions      19,089               35,685
     Ftp Sessions        6,500               27,497
     Telnet Sessions    46,182
     Mail Server           856

     by John Zalubski (johnz@rs.internic.net>





Cooper                                                         [Page 18]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


ISI
---

     GIGABIT NETWORKING
     -----------------

     Infrastructure

     Joyce Reynolds to attend the Australian Academy Research Net Workshop
     Conference in Melbourne, Australia, and participate as keynote
     speaker, November 20 - December 03 1993.

     3 RFCs were published this month.

        RFC 1544:  Rose, M., "The Content-MD5 Header Field", Dover
                   Beach Consulting, Inc., November 1993.

        RFC 1545:  Piscitello, D., "FTP Operation Over Big Address
                   Records (FOOBAR)", Bellcore, November 1993.

        RFC 1546:  Partridge, C., T. Mendez, W. Milliken, "Host
                   Anycasting Service", BBN, November 1993.

     THE US DOMAIN
     -------------

     Misdirected Requests:

     Many requests are sent to Internic for registration in EDU, ORG, or
     GOV, for organizations that should "obviously" be in the US domain.
     Part of the problem is that not everyone is aware of the US domain
     (see RFC 1480), and that what is obvious to some can't be seen at
     all by others.  The Internic forwards any requests for schools
     (K12, CC, TEC), non-federal government agencies, and other
     organizations that "obviously" fit in the US domain (such as
     Libraries, Museums).  A great deal of effort and delay results when
     discussion, explanation, and even argument, when a request for a
     name in EDU, ORG, or GOV, has to be converted into a registration
     in the US domain.

     WHOIS Database:

     One current problem area is getting domain names listed in the
     "whois" database.  The Internic has decided that it can't keep
     everything in its one central database.  The plan is to have
     distributed databases, and distributed whois servers.  However,
     there is currently no easily configured software package to
     distribute.  This is also an area of active work in the IETF.



Cooper                                                         [Page 19]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


     US DOMAIN ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION
     ------------------------------------

     EMAIL/FAX/PHONE         673
     ----------------------------
     Total Contacts          673


     DELEGATIONS              20
     DIRECT REGISTRATIONS:    17
     OTHER US DOMAIN MSGS:   636
     ---------------------------
     Total

     OTHER US DOMAIN MESSAGES INCLUDE: modifications, application
     requests, discussion and clarification of the requests, questions
     about names, referrals to other subdomains or to/from the InterNic,
     resolving technical problems with zone files and name servers, and
     whois listings.

     Third Level US Domain Delegations this month
     --------------------------------------------

     LIB.LA.US               Louisiana Libraries
     TEC.LA.US               Louisiana Technical Schools
     CC.LA.US                Louisiana Community Colleges
     STARKSVILLE.MN.US       Starksville, Mississippi
     OKTIBBEHA.MS.US         Oktibbeha, Mississippi
     GREENSBORO.NC.US        Greensboro, North Carolina
     GEN.MN.US               Minnesota "general" subdomain

     Other US Domain Delegations this month
     --------------------------------------

     TCCL.LIB.OK.US          Tulsa City-County Library System
     BILLINGS.LIB.MT.US      Parmly-Billings Public Library
     ED.CO.TULARE.CA.US      Tulare County Office of Education
     CCC.STATE.NJ.US         Casino Control Commission/Atlantic City
     WIPP.CARLSBAD.NM.US     Westinghouse, WIPP Site, Carlsbad, NM
     CO.WESTCHESTER.NY.US    Westchester County, NY, Gov't agencies
     CI.LONG-BEACH.CA.US     Long Beach, CA,  City Gov't agencies
     CI.BRYAN.TX.US          Bryan, TX, City Gov't agencies
     EASTHS.MCSD.K12.TN.US       East High School, Tennessee
     CLINTONHS.ACSD.K12.TN.US    Clinton High School, Tennessee
     GRUNDYCHHS.GCSD.K12.TN.US   Grundy County High School, TN
     SUMMERTOWNHS.LCSD.K12.TN.US Summertown High School, Tennessee
     JACKSONCHSHS.JMSD.K12.TN.US Jackson-Central Merry High School,TN




Cooper                                                         [Page 20]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


                     TABLE OF DELEGATED DOMAINS BY STATE


             K12     CC      TEC     STATE   LIB     MUS     GEN
     -----------------------------------------------------------
     AK
     AL
     AR       X
     AS
     AZ       X              X               X       X
     -----------------------------------------------------------
     CA       X              X
     CO       X      X       X               X
     CT
     DC
     -----------------------------------------------------------
     DE       X      X       X       X       X

     FL       X      X       X       X       X
     GA       X              X       X       X
     HI
     -----------------------------------------------------------
     IA       X      X       X               X
     ID
     IL       X      X       X               X
     IN       X      X       X       X
     KS
     -----------------------------------------------------------
     KY       X      X       X       X       X       X       X
     LA       X      X       X       X       X
     MA
     ME                              X
     MI       X      X       X               X
     -----------------------------------------------------------
     MN       X      X       X       X       X       X       X
     MO       X      X               X       X
     MS       X                      X
     MT
     NC       X      X               X       X
     -----------------------------------------------------------
     ND       X                      X
     NE       X                      X       X
     NH       X              X
     NJ       X
     NM       X                      X               X
     -----------------------------------------------------------





Cooper                                                         [Page 21]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


             K12     CC      TEC     STATE   LIB     MUS     GEN
     -----------------------------------------------------------
     NV
     NY       X                      X
     OH       X      X       X       X       X       X       X
     OK
     OR       X                              X
     -----------------------------------------------------------
     PA       X                              X
     RI       X
     SC       X      X       X       X       X
     SD       X                      X
     -----------------------------------------------------------
     TN
     TX       X      X               X       X
     UT       X                      X       X
     VA
     -----------------------------------------------------------
     VI
     VT       X                      X
     WA
     WI       X              X       X
     WV       X      X       X       X       X       X       X
     WY                              X
     ===========================================================

     For more information about the US Domain please request an
     application via the RFC-INFO service.  Send a message to RFC-
     INFO@ISI.EDU with the contents "Help: us_domain_application". For
     example:

                  To: RFC-INFO@ISI.EDU
                  Subject: US Domain Application

                  help: us_domain_application

     Ann Westine Cooper (Cooper@ISI.EDU)

     MULTIMEDIA CONFERENCING

     At the Houston IETF meeting, ISI (co-)chaired two working groups
     related to teleconferencing.  The Audio/Video Transport Working
     Group met for only one session this time since the draft
     specification for the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) has been
     submitted for the first RFC stage.  The emphasis of this session
     was on implementation experience, with the focus shifting to
     companion specifications for profiles and encodings.  The MMusic
     working group met for two sessions at the Houston IETF meeting.



Cooper                                                         [Page 22]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


     The first day was dedicated to a short overview of the goals and
     context for the working group and then to a presentation of an
     algorithm and framework for managing shared session state.  The
     second meeting focused on preliminary ideas on what might comprise
     shared session state for a couple of different session types, and
     then three short presentations on related work.

     The Houston IETF marked the sixth live multicast of audio and
     video.  The number of remote hosts participanting was 629, which
     for the second time was approximately equal to the number of people
     who attended locally.

     Last month, we released mmcc, the multimedia conference control
     program, but only in binary form for Sun SPARCs.  This month we
     have been working on ports to other platforms, and expect to
     release binary versions for DEC 5000 and Alpha, HP 700, and SGI in
     December.  A source release is also planned soon.

     Eve Schooler gave a presentation "Multimedia Session Control for
     Internet Telecollaboration" over the MBone from ISI to the NASA
     Science Centers' ICNN/S Conference in Monterey, CA, Nov 17, 1993.

     Eve Schooler, Steve Casner, Joe Touch
     (Schooler@ISI.EDU, Casner@ISI.EDU, Touch@ISI.EDU)

MERIT/MICHNET
-------------

     New MichNet affiliates during the month of November include
     Kellogg, Inc. of Battle Creek and the Metro Net Library Consortium,
     representing seven libraries in the suburban Detroit area.  Over
     the coming months, Metro Net will connect eight sites.  The first
     three 56Kbps links have been installed: direct links to Bloomfield
     Hills and Rochester Hills, and a frame relay link to Farmington
     Hills.  Merit has also assisted the Metro Net Consortium in
     installing and configuring a Unix host, providing additional data
     networking support for the consortium.  The Ford Motor Company will
     be upgrading their current 56Kbps link to Ford Research to a T1
     Internet connection.  This link will potentially provide all of
     Ford with Internet access for the first time.  The State of
     Michigan Department of Natural Resources will also be upgrading
     their MichNet link to 56Kbps and a pair of cisco routers, replacing
     the older PDP-11 system.

     MichNet is one of eight state networks joining CICNet in the Rural
     Datafication Project funded by a $1.3 million National Science
     Foundation grant.  The project's purpose of extending Internet
     access and services to underserved constituencies parallels the



Cooper                                                         [Page 23]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


     Rural Electrification Act of 1936, which brought electrical power
     to millions of rural residents.  Project funding will be used to
     establish standards and information servers for the Rural
     Datafication Project and extend the network infrastructure to an
     additional 19 rural locations throughout the region.  Three new
     points of presence (POPs) will be located in Michigan, where
     efforts will be focused on the Upper Peninsula.

     "Building a Communication Network Linking Knowledge Providers,
     Small Business Users, and Industrial Extension Agents in Michigan"
     has been funded by the ARPA defense conversion activity known as
     the Technology Reinvestment Project, TRP.  Michigan State
     University led the proposal effort, with Merit as the network
     provider in this project.  The effect of efforts through this
     proposal will be to expand dial-in access to MichNet.

     At Michigan State University, equipment for several microcomputer
     laboratories is being upgraded and new labs established.  A new Mac
     lab of 22 Centris 610s was added to Erickson Hall, and a new
     language lab will have 16 Centris 660AVs plus laser disk players.
     With dial-up use almost doubling over the past year, new high-speed
     and low-speed lines were added to the modem pool.  A total of 63
     high-speed (9600-38.4bps) and 76 low-speed (1200/2400bps) are now
     available at MSU.  Galactica, a dictionary-like database of
     computing terms, may now be found at gopher.msu.edu .

     Saginaw Valley State University has converted its campus network
     from Pronet-10 token-ring to Ethernet.  Faculty and staff with
     network connections have direct access from their workstations to
     the Internet via 10Base-T Ethernet LANs connected to Novell Netware
     servers/routers, which are in turn connected to the campus fiber
     backbone.  The Valley Library Consortium, based at SVSU, has
     installed fiber to connect its computer to the SVSU MichNet router,
     which is being upgraded to support such a connection.

     Eastern Michigan University and Merit Network, Inc. will jointly
     host the 1994 ACM SIGUCCS User Services Conference XXII.  "Meet the
     Shadowy Future," will focus on planning for change when the future
     remains uncertain.  Scheduled for October 16-20, 1994, at the
     Radisson-on-the-Lake in Ypsilanti, MI, inquiries may be sent to the
     conference mailing list SIGUCCS94@emuvax.emich.edu .

     Michigan Technological University has completed its 5-year plan for
     fiber installation and is proceeding to network the campus dorms.
     The Xylogic Annex III terminal servers were chosen for this
     initiative; asynchronous access will be implemented first, with ppp
     soon to follow.  A new trunk of 16 high-speed modems is in
     production, bringing the number of modems available to 32.



Cooper                                                         [Page 24]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


     Wayne State University is participating with Michigan State and the
     University of Michigan in a project to use PACLink.  This project
     will allow the NOTIS systems at the three sites to query each
     other.  The underlying mechanism is an RS/6000 at each site which
     will act as a gateway between the Internet and the local SNA
     system.

     The Gopher Pilot Project is underway at Wayne State.  Pilot members
     are Computing and Information Technology, Student Affairs,
     University Libraries and University Relations.  The main Gopher
     server for WSU is gopher.wayne.edu .  This machine also has a
     public client available by logging in as gopher.

     Teacher Education at Central Michigan University is installing a
     freenet server called Education Central.  This will be accessible
     through the Internet and MichNet to teachers around the state.
     This educational bulletin board and information server has received
     grant support.

     Laura Kelleher, of Merit Network Information Services, spoke on
     data networking to 200 members of the Washtenaw-Livingston Area
     Education Technology Network.  Dana Sitzler, coordinator of
     MichNet's K-12 Outreach projects, participated in the 1993 Michigan
     Educational Technology Conference and Exposition in Grand Rapids,
     Michigan.  Sheri Repucci, coordinator of MichNet recruiting
     activities, spoke to graduate students in public library service at
     the University of Michigan School of Information and Library
     Studies on public access to MichNet, its resources, and beyond to
     the global Internet.

     Jo Ann Ward (jaw@merit.edu)
     Merit Network, Inc. Information Service

MERIT/NSFNET INFORMATION SERVICES
---------------------------------

     Merit/NSFNET Information Services

     During November, new international sites with announcement to the
     NSFNET backbone included Kenya, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates,
     the Netherlands Antilles, Equatorial Guinea and Peru.  Foreign
     networks now number 8,106, of a total 19,664 networks announced to
     the NSFNET backbone.  Growth as the number of domestic and foreign
     networks having announcement to the NSFNET infrastructures, as well
     as network distribution by country over the term of the NSFNET
     project, are available as

             /nsfnet/statistics/history.netcount



Cooper                                                         [Page 25]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


     and
             /nsfnet/statistics/nets.by.country

     respectively on nic.merit.edu.

     The resources of nic.merit.edu are available through Anonymous FTP,
     electronic mail query and a Gopher client connecting to the Merit
     Network Gopher server on nic.merit.edu, port 70.

     New information available on nic.merit.edu includes an update of
     Peter Kaminski's Public Dialup Internet Access List (PDIAL), a list
     of organizations providing dialup Internet access.  Available as
     /internet/providers/pdial

     Merit Network, Inc. was well represented at the IETF fall meeting
     in Houston, TX: attending were Pat Smith, NISI co-chair; Ellen
     Hoffman, USERDOC2 co-chair; Chris Weider co-chair of IDS and IIIR;
     Mark Knopper, TUBA co-chair; Jessica Yu, BGPDEPL chair; Sue Hares
     IPIDRP chair and NOOP co-chair; Allan Rubens NASREQ co-chair; John
     Vollbrecht NASREQ co-chair; Dale Johnson, Andrew L. Adams, Larry
     Blunk, Bill Norton, Laurent Joncheray, Enke Chen and Rick
     Schmalgemeier.  Weider also spoke at the DCI sponsored "E-Mail
     World" in California.

     Ellen Hoffman and Laura Kelleher represented Merit at the fall
     meeting of CNI in Chantilly, Virginia.  NICFEST, hosted by the
     InterNIC in San Diego, was attended by Pat Smith, Susan R. Harris
     and Ellen Hoffman.  Smith, Harris and Hoffman also participated in
     the ACM SIGUCCS User Services Conference, "Toward New Horizons."
     Smith and Hoffman attended the "Future of NICs" BOF, hosted by
     Martyne Halgren of the SIGUCCS Networking Task Force.

     Hoffman is the program chair for 1994 ACM SIGUCCS User Services
     Conference XXII.  "Meet the Shadowy Future," will focus on planning
     for change when the future remains uncertain.  Sponsored by ACM
     SIGUCCS and jointly hosted by Eastern Michigan University and Merit
     Network, Inc., SIGUCCS XXII will be held at Radisson-on-the-Lake in
     Ypsilanti, MI, October 16-20, 1994.  A conference mailing list has
     been established for getting answers to any questions you may have.
     Send to SIGUCCS94@emuvax.emich.edu .

     Merit will present another in its series of Networking Seminars
     January 27-28, 1994, in Orlando, Florida.  "Making Your Internet
     Connection Count: Technology, Tools and Resources" will be held at
     the Walt Disney World Yacht Club Resort.  Co-sponsored by Florida
     State University and the University of Florida, this seminar
     includes an overview of Internet resources, popular tools for
     network access, and the national policies that affect its growth.



Cooper                                                         [Page 26]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


     Nationally known experts talk to attendees about network resources,
     getting connected and how the network is effectively being used
     today by universities, research organizations, libraries, and
     public schools.  Interactive breakout sessions each day make it
     possible to get your questions answered by experts.

     Scheduled topics and speakers include "Moving Toward the
     Information Superhighway," the keynote address by Robert Heterick,
     President, EDUCOM; "Navigating the Internet: Network Tools," Alan
     Emtage, VP Bunyip; "Information Delivery on the Internet: What's
     Next for Gopher," Mark McCahill, Gopher Developer at the University
     of Minnesota; "University of Michigan Weather Underground," Perry
     Samson, Professor Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space
     Sciences, University of Michigan; "Electronic Democracy," Jean
     Armour Polly, Manager of Network Development and User Training
     NYSERNet, Inc.; "NSFNET and the NII," Priscilla Huston, NSFNET
     Project Director, NSF; "The New Networking Infrastructure for
     Education Program," Art St.  George, Program Director, Applications
     of Advanced Technologies, NSF; "Disney's Applications of Advanced
     Technology," Lou Kompare, Director of Telecommunications and
     Technology, Walt Disney World Attractions; and the closing address
     by Donna Cox, Director of Numerical Lab Programs, NCSA.

     Internet connectivity will be available in a hands-on demonstration
     room, where seminar attendees can access the many resources on the
     Internet using the latest information delivery tools.

     The registration fee is $495 until December 23, 1993.  After
     December 23, the cost is $595.  This fee includes the two-day
     seminar, all seminar materials, receptions on Wednesday and
     Thursday evenings, lunches on Thursday and Friday, refreshments and
     access to Internet-connected computers.

     Limited scholarships will be available.  The deadline for
     scholarship applications is December 23, 1993.

             For more information, send an e-mail message to:
                     nic-info@nic.merit.edu
             with the text
                     send next.seminar

     This information is also available as the document
     /nsfnet/next.seminar on nic.merit.edu for retrieval using Anonymous
     FTP or in the Gopher server on nic.merit.edu, port 70, as Next
     Merit/NSFNET Seminar--Jan. '94.

     Jo Ann Ward (jaw@merit.edu)




Cooper                                                         [Page 27]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


MRNET
-------

     We are pleased to announce the following staff additions to the
     Minnesota Regional network for the expansion of client services and
     engineering operations:

     Ms. Margo Berg, Director of Client Services for Education
     Ms. Marti Palmer, Director of Client Services for Business &
     Government
     Mr. Chris Elmquist, Network Engineer
     Mr. Gregg Brekke, Network Engineer

     New hub sites have been established in

     Moorhead, MN
     Mankato, MN
     St. Cloud, MN

     Recent new member attachments include:

     The Northern Lights Library Network
     Lamb, Inc.
     Minnesota Center for Arts Education
     Medtronic
     HealthPartners
     William Mitchell College of Law
     Exchange Data & Decision Systems

     This brings total attached membership to a total of 63
     organizations.

     Contact: info@MR.Net for any further information.

     Dennis Fazio, Executive Director
     Minnesota Regional Network
     Minneapolis, MN
     (612) 342-2570

     by Dennis Fazio (dfazio@MR.net>











Cooper                                                         [Page 28]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


NORTHWESTNET
-------------

     We welcome several new NorthWestNet members this month:

          Lane OnLine                        Eugene, OR
          Lewis-Clark State College          Lewiston, ID
          Pacific Lutheran University        Tacoma, WA
          Whitworth College                  Spokane, WA
          OGI Telecomm Ltd.                  Beaverton, OR
          Oregon Center for Advanced
           Technology Education (OCATE)      Beaverton, OR

     We also want to welcome a new NorthWestNet staff member.  The next
     edition of "The Internet Passport: NorthWestNet's Guide to Our
     World Online" is now in the capable hands of David Robison,
     educational documentation specialist.  David has assumed the role
     of primary author and editorial coordinator of NorthWestNet's
     premier Internet resource guide.  Before starting at NorthWestNet,
     David worked at the University of California at Berkeley Library
     and was the founding editor of the electronic newsletter "Current
     Cites."  David has an MLIS from the University of California at
     Berkeley.

     Several staff members gave invited presentations during the past
     four weeks, including the following:

         Dr. Eric Hood, Executive Director of NorthWestNet
         -------------------------------------------------
             Spokane Intercollegiate Research and Technology Institute
             (SIRTI)
             Conference:  "On Ramps to the Information Highway"
             Spokane, Washington -- November 5
             "The Internet: Here, Now, and the Future" and "Building
             an Information Highway for the Northwest."

         Jan Eveleth, Director of User Services
         --------------------------------------
           SIGUCCS '93
           San Diego, California -- November 8
           Panel presentation:  "NorthWestNet Network Info. Center"
           and Association for Computer Professionals in
           Education (ACPE)   Portland, Oregon -- November 18
           "K-12 and the Internet:  An Online Demo of Selected
           Resources"






Cooper                                                         [Page 29]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


         Mike Showalter, Information Services Specialist
         -----------------------------------------------
           King County Library System (presentation for staff members)
           Seattle, Washington -- November 18
           "Copyright in Cyberspace: An Overview of Internet-Related
             Copyright Issues"

     NorthWestNet member organizations can now request to have a network
     (Usenet) newsfeed provided from a NorthWestNet-managed news server
     host to the member's news server host via the Network News Transfer
     Protocol (NNTP).  (Inclusion and exclusion filtering is available.)
     In the past, members have obtained this service on an ad hoc basis.
     Requests for newsfeeds must be initiated by the member's
     Institutional Representative.  Member sites should contact
     NorthWestNet for more information.

     Twenty-five K-12 teachers participated in four Internet training
     sessions which were delivered in support of two grant programs:
     "Changing How We Organize: Inclusion Through Collaboration and
     Educational Support (CHOICES)" and "Enabling K-12 Education in the
     Pacific Northwest through Internetworking."

     -----------------
     NorthWestNet                         E-mail: info@nwnet.net
     15400 SE 30th Place, Suite 202       Phone:  (206) 562-3000
     Bellevue, WA 98007                   Fax:    (206) 562-4822

     Dr. Eric S. Hood, Executive Director
     Jan Eveleth, Director of User Services
     Dan L. Jordt, Director of Technical Services
     Anthony Naughtin, Director of Member Relations

     NorthWestNet serves the six state region of Alaska, Idaho, Montana,
     North Dakota, Oregon, and Washington.

     by Jan Eveleth <eveleth@nwnet.net>

UCL
----

     Zheng Wang gave a paper at the Lancast NOSDAV workshop on Unified
     Multicast Forwarding.

     Jon Crowcroft gave a paper at the UK Adivosrry Group on Graphics
     workshop on Multimedia in Higher Education, on Network Support for
     Multimedia. And another paper at the British Computer Society's one
     day seminar on "Internet: Boom or Bust" on Scalable Solutions to
     IPng.



Cooper                                                         [Page 30]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


     UCL participated in the first UK Academic Mbone Pilot Project
     meeting, to make sure that MICE, ARPA and other internetaional
     multicast connectivity were on the agenda.

     MICE organised several more mbone seminars, which are now being
     made available in the Web through mosaic by Anders Klemets at SICS
     at the URL:

     http://www.it.kth.se/~klemets/vatplay.html

     As are the UK (JIPS) Mbone documents (and mrinfo etc) by Piete
     Brooks at:

     http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/mbone

     This technology surely is the biggest step in Internet usability
     for several years.

     John Crowcroft (j.crowcroft@CS.UCL.AC.UK)
































Cooper                                                         [Page 31]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


USER SERVICES REPORT
--------------------

                               Trip Report
             16th RIPE Meeting - Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                         September 15-17, 1993
                           Joyce K. Reynolds
                   USC/Information Sciences Institute

The 16th RIPE Meeting

   The 16th RIPE Meeting was held in September 1993 in Amsterdam, The
   Netherlands.  Approval of the agenda was first, with parallel
   sessions starting after general plenaries.  This meeting was being
   audiocast to the world.

RIPE NCC Report by Daniel Karrenberg

   There are currently 450,000 Internet hosts at the end of August 1993
   and the numbers are still increasing.  Daniel presented an overview
   of the registry, document store, new database, and new software
   development.

   The RIPE NCC Internet Registry (IR)

      According to Daniel, at the the RIPE NCC IR, it is "business as
      usual".  The 193.x.y delegation is a success.  The registry has
      started using 194.x.y allocation, because there are no large
      blocks left in 192.x.y.  (Note: There are no blocks of "8"
      anymore.)  There was a need to use 194.x.y using CIDR very
      aggressively.  With the 194.x.y allocation, the RIPE NCC will be
      more conservative in using the 194.x.y address space.  There are
      still 193.x.y numbers left (about 50%).

      The Internet registry template is updated every six months.
      Daniel stressed to please us the common registry template on file.
      There is a new leaflet available (green leaflet) containing
      information about the RIPE NCC IR.

   Document Store

      World Wide Web (WWW) is now operational.  Daniel suggested to the
      group to try out xmosaic, if you are running x-windows.  The
      Gopher structure is being revised.  There will be a more detailed
      report on this at the next RIPE meeting in January 1994.  A
      general revision of the document store has been initiated.  Send
      comments to Anne Lord.




Cooper                                                         [Page 32]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


New RIPE Database Software by Marten Tempstra

   Marten presented the newly upgraded RIPE database software.  The
   question arose of why was it necessary to rewrite the software?
   Marten responded by stating that the old style took two hours a day
   (manually).  It also required many modifications to keep it running.
   The object checking was too loose, and almost always in a "don't
   touch" state.

   A design decision was made, which included a decrease in manpower for
   updates, lower turnaround times, making the database easily
   extendible, and a guarded attributes provision.  The new software is
   written in Perl, which is highly portable, nice DMB features, and
   easy to make changes.  This new software enables the staff to make
   "on the fly" updates, the updates are immediately available in WHOIS,
   and the turn around time is immediate.  There is no human
   intervention.  It also provides for a guarded attributes provision,
   improved syntax checking, a faster WHOIS server, and it can also
   manage multiple databases (same syntax).

   Current status is that there are 30 Perl modules, 3500 lines of code.
   So far, Marten and Daniel are happy with the design.  Distribution
   will be in November.

Odds and Ends by Daniel Karrenberg

   Daniel described the current RIPE NCC outlook:

        PRIDE project started (see notes below)
        One more staff being hired for it.
        Position for six month projects available.
        Populating the routing registry is next.

   What is very important to mention is that the RIPE NCC funding for
   1994 for core activities is not complete.  The budget is 260,000 ECU,
   which is about 100,000 ECU short.

Progress on Joint Projects by Tony Bates

   GISS Project Summary

      Tony mentioned that Daniel covered alot in his RIPE NCC report
      about the GISS Project summary.  It is a joint RARE/RIPE project.
      The project is finished.  It was an interesting endeavor, but at
      the same time, it wasn't an easy task.  A lot more work is needed.
      Draft 3 documentation is available via ftp.ripe.net:
      ripe/docs/ripe-drafts/giss.txt.  There is a draft charter in to
      the IETF to make a "GISS" working group.



Cooper                                                         [Page 33]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


   Route Server Project

      This project is officially over.  The RIPE NCC will continue to
      operate the route server.  The route server itself is fully
      operational.  The routing software is working well, and the policy
      based derivation is working in "kludge" mode (needs the RR
      populated).  These are all working automatically.  Collaboration
      with other projects continues.

      Work on monitoring of European routing is reported on a daily and
      weekly basis.  This project is continuing to look at the new
      networks and routing domains appearing in Europe.  The consensus
      is to use the route servers by the proto-GIX partners as soon as
      possible.  A report has been filed about this project, and is
      available via ftp.ripe.net.  This was a SURFnet funded project,
      which provided the stimulus.

   PRIDE Project

      "Policy-based Routing Implementation and Deployment in Europe"
      (PRIDE).  This project was recently started, because the routing
      situation is becoming "even more" complex.  The Route Server
      project and the RIPE 81 charters highlight the clear need for
      tools, operational based tools (i.e., configuration) and routing
      registry tools.  There needs to be policies now, they need to be
      up-to-date.  The Routing Registry is the key and needs maximum
      population for:

              1) implementation, and
              2) deployment (information and help).

      This idea is very much overdue.

      The implementation would include a "prcheck (consistency checker),
      "prpath" (path extraction), "prconn" (display connection according
      to policy), "prtractroute" (traceroute), and "prconfig"
      (configuration).  Others will be added as needed or proposed.
      Deployment means registry population and widespread use of tools.
      A PRIDE guide, and PRIDE course development documents will be
      written.

      The PRIDE Project Plan includes:

              1 Year plan (startup 1st Sept 93)
              8 Milestones
              Staged Phases (tools release, courses, guides)





Cooper                                                         [Page 34]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


      The initial tools release will include "prtractroute".  The
      current project status includes its very own logo and t-shirts!
      Seriously, the initial release is out.  The project will be
      carried out at the RIPE NCC.  There will be two FTEs for one year,
      plus NCC support.  The funders are the JNT, UNNETT, UUNET, EUnet
      B.V..  All tools and material will be made publically available.
      There's funding to "come to you", if regionals cannot participate.
      They are open to all comments, as the intention is to become a
      RIPE NCC core activity.

RIPE NCC Review by Rob Blokzijl

   The RIPE NCC activity document is out and needs to be discussed.
   This new activity plan identifies the areas they have been doing, but
   not funded.  For example, the Internet Registry.  The 1991 RIPE NCC
   activity plan did not include the IR.  Rob asked for continued
   discussion and input on the revised plan, which will start on the 1st
   January 1994.

RARE and RIPE Relationships

   RIPE came into being as the IP coordination in Europe.  The RARE
   emphasis is still the same.  These two groups want to avoid
   duplication of activities.  They have joint projects that are
   defined, run, and funded.

GARR's Network Resource Discovery by Giuseppe Romano

   Giuseppe Romano of GARR (Italian Research and Academic Network
   Network Information Service) gave a presentation on GARR's on-line
   network resource guide.  This guide was produced to support end users
   to find information, and to help end users to access selected
   resources.  This topic will also be discussed in the NIDUS Working
   Group meeting (see notes below).

   The GARR resource guide is an experimental on-line service.  A.
   Blasco Bonito suggested that this service should be placed at the
   RIPE NCC.  Some RIPE meeting participants suggested that this service
   should be brought into Jill Foster's RARE ISUS (Information Services
   and User Support) group.

EARN's Network Resource Guide by Daniele Bovio

   There was a joint RARE/EARN meeting regarding each group's efforts
   and focus.  A pact between them has been settled that EARN will
   specifically focus on user support.  Their resource guide is a
   combined effort of EARN staff members.  Drafts for each chapter were
   submitted and compiled.  Then, everything was given to David Sitman



Cooper                                                         [Page 35]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


   (as EARN project coordinator).  The guide was produced in time for
   the JENC (Joint European Networking Conference) Trondheim conference.
   A 1 July 93 revised draft was presented and discussed at the
   Amsterdam IETF in Joyce Reynolds' USWG (User Services Working Group)
   session.  A second editon of this guide will be available by the
   Warsaw NSC (Network Services Conference) meeting.  Bert Stals of the
   RARE ISUS working group assisted with input and comments.  The first
   edition of the guide was distributed at the JENC, IETF, and INET93.
   The guide is directed to all end users.

Local Internet Registry Group by Daniel Karrenberg

   The Local Internet Registry Group held a workshop at the beginning of
   the week before the RIPE meetings.  A question was brought up whether
   their workshops should be held at the same time as the RIPE meetings.
   A decision was made that they will continue to be informal, with no
   keeping of minutes, and to keep holding them in conjunction with the
   RIPE meetings, to cut down on travel.

   There was a discussion about publishing local registries, as the
   current policy is to not publish them.  All local registries are
   running smoothly.  Some service providers say that they don't want
   this.  Customers will be revealed.  They don't want to publish their
   own lists.  The argument was that it doesn't make any sense to hide
   this information.  Daniel made mention that this is not in the spirit
   of the Internet.  Analogy would be once you start hiding the IP
   contacts, the next will be the Domains.  Service provides need to
   accept responsibility.  They must assume formal responsibility,
   essentially because there are more service providers every year.
   This issue must be resolved, eventhough the Internet is subtly
   becoming commercial.  Look at the different exchange service
   infrastructures that are included.

   Daniel will take all comments, summarize and provide a proposal.  The
   biggest issue is the operational contact points.  Daniel would like
   to propose that the RIPE NCC publish ALL registries, provider and
   non-provider by country.  The group agreed that there should be a
   complete list of local IRs.  A. Blasco Bonito requested further
   discussion off-line about the functions of the non-provider registry.
   The results of this proposal will be in put the RIPE NCC activity
   plan.

   The group discussed future needed documents.  One document would be
   an FAQ on CIDR and subnetting, and another document would be
   appropriate on why is it good Internet citizenship to give back IP
   address space.





Cooper                                                         [Page 36]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


   Administration of top level domains was discussed.  The group felt
   the Lebanon top level domain request took too long.  If this happens
   in Europe, it might be good to have the RIPE NCC handle the proces.
   There was no objection from this group.  The idea is to have the RIPE
   NCC jump in when there isn't any consensus in a country and have the
   NCC handle it.  Daniel said the RIPE NCC is willing to provide this
   service, and he will communicate this to the IANA.

BOF session on European Architecture Development by Bernhard Stockman

   The intent is to maintain and improve routing between Europe and the
   U.S.  This is an operational engineering issue that Bernhard is
   trying to deal with here, not routing issues.  First, he would like
   to identify the level of ambition, and whether it is on a complex or
   intermediate level.  The issues include:

           -What  is routing stability?
           -Look at the progress of CIDR development in Europe
           -What is the level of complexity?
                   a) multiple Internet Services providers
                   b) see a need for some kind of interchange
                   c) address ideas on where - possible locations
                   d) who can connect?  who is acceptable as a peer?
                   e) what does this group want to say about this?
                   f) regulator issues - who is in charge?
                   g) is there a need for a management framework?
           -Technical needs
                   a) technical requirements specification
                   b) time estimations to operate
                   c) source based policy routing (SDRP) pilot - this
                      is happening in the IETF, but what can
                      the RIPE group do?

Report on the EBONE Consortium Meeting

   There is already a plan in place with the continuation of the EBONE
   effort (EBONE2) of a distributed GIX (D-GIX).  D-GIX was
   overwhelmingly approved, as there is an urgent need for a full fledge
   solution.  The interim solution of interconnectivity ("Interim D-
   GIX") was discussed.  The group needs to agree if this is a good
   idea.  There would be an initial separation of routing and payload
   traffic, but is there a need to do this?  The issues include:

           -separation of routing and payload
           -a D-GIX specification is needed
           -need for some kind of informal/formal body to be responsible
            for operational issues
           -need for some kind of pilot phase that would:



Cooper                                                         [Page 37]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


                   a) specify what
                   b) specify time schedules
                   c) goals
           -a SDRP/multifacet router might happen
            other groups (RARE, etc.) may look into this
           -simplify route server implementation of a D-GIX
           -need for improvements
           -flexibility versus connectivity in D-GIX

   Other issues to consider:

           -routing registry population - "pushing"?
           -secret routing information - consider this?
           -liaisons with the IEPG - need to liase with more operations
            related forums that exist within the various continents.

   Bernhard opened the floor for comments.  Is there a need for a
   working group in RIPE to work on this issue?  The group stated a
   resounding yes.  The maintenance and improvement of routing between
   Europe and the U.S. is the main issue.  This is much more focussed
   and defined on an operations level.  This item needs to stay within
   the RIPE framework.  This new working group would be on neutral
   ground and open (like an operations forum).

   What about "beyond D-GIX"?  This working group would be an evolving
   group, which would concentrate on D-GIX right now, but would keep
   their eyes and ears open.  The major item the attendees see as
   missing is a requirement document.

Network Information Discovery for Users Support (NIDUS WG)

   The NIDUS WG, chaired by Nandor Hovarth, held a session at this RIPE
   meeting.  Joyce Reynolds presented a report on the IETF User Services
   Area activities and meetings held during the Amsterdam IETF in July
   (see Appendix).

   Nandor lead a continued discussion regarding GARR's Resource Guide
   (see above).  The group felt that this resource guide could have two
   paths to follow.

           -continue building on the guide as is and keep enhancing it
           -find out if a pilot project group needs to be started to
            help in the development of the specialization of each item
            within the guide
           -would RIPE be the forum for this pilot or RARE?






Cooper                                                         [Page 38]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


Appendix

                                IETF
                       User Services Area Report
                       Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                        Joyce K. Reynolds (USAD)


   10 working groups in the User Services Area of the IETF met in
   Amsterdam.


   Integrated Directory Services (IDS), chaired by Chris Weider and
   Tim Howes.  (Summary reported by Chris Weider.)

   The IDS Working Group is chartered to facilitate the integration and
   interoperability of current and future directory services into a
   unified directory service.  This work will unite directory services
   based on a heterogeneous set of directory services protocols (X.500,
   WHOIS++, etc.).  In addition to specifying technical requirements for
   the integration, the IDS Group will also contribute to the
   administrative and maintenance issues of directory service offerings
   by publishing guidelines on directory data integrity, maintenance,
   security, and privacy and legal issues for users and administrators of
   directories.

   The "Advanced Usages of X.500" document from the DISI WG has been
   sent to the RFC Editor for publication.  The "Pilot Project" catalog is
   out as an Internet-Draft (I-D).  The Revision of FYI 11 has been
   released as an I-D and will be submitted to the RFC Editor for
   publication by the end of August 1993.  A draft on, "Legal & Privacy
   Issues in Directory Services" was submitted and will be published as an
   I-D.  A draft on, "A Guide to Available Directory Services" was
   circulated and will be advanced as an I-D for eventual publication as
   an Informational RFC.  The Directory Services Policy Handbook will be
   split into pieces and will be released as a series of documents.


   Integration of Internet Information Resources Working Group (IIIR),
   chaired by Chris Weider.  (Summary reported by Chris Weider.)

   IIIR is chartered to facilitate interoperability between Internet
   Information Services, and to develop, specify, and align protocols
   designed to integrate the plethora of Internet information services
   (WAIS, archie, Prospero, etc.) into a single "virtually unified
   information service".





Cooper                                                         [Page 39]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


   IIIR met twice at this IETF.  At the first session, the HTML I-D from

   Tim Berners-Lee was discussed, and will be submitted as an
   Informational RFC.  The HTTP protocol will also be released as an I-D
   before the next IETF.  HTML+ may be brought in as a potential
   standard.  At the second session, the "Vision of an Integrated
   Internet Information Architecture" document is still an ID, as
   comments have come in that need to be incorporated.  The "Resource
   Transponders" document was discussed.  The potential overlap with the
   Service Location group's work has still not resolved.

   The "Taxomomy of Information Services" document has been shelved as
   other papers have recently been published on this work.  There are
   some minor problems with the Gopher RFC which will be addressed in an
   addendum.  The Prospero protocol was suggested as a means of
   Integrating Information Services.  Discussion on this item will be
   taken to the IIIR WG email list.  The Gopher/IIIR datatype
   specifications will be registered as MIME types.  A document will be
   written on failure tracking and resolution between information
   services.  "Z39.50 over TCP/IP" will be released as an I-D, to
   eventually become an Informational RFC.  A paper on integrating data
   elements between the IAFA WG's paper and the library community will be
   released as an I-D.


   Internet School Networking (ISN) session led by Jennifer Sellers
   (NASA).  (Summary reported by Jennifer Sellers.)

   The Internet School Networking Working Group is chartered to
   facilitate the connection of the United States' K-12
   (Kindergarten-12th Grade) schools, public and private, to the
   Internet, and school networking in general.

   After some background on the history of ISN, the group shared
   experiences in school networking and their own companies and projects.
   There were 30 or 35 people in attendance and almost all had more than
   a passing interest in school networking.  Next, the group gave a lot
   of good feedback on the document currently under construction, the I-D
   on FAQs for the Primary and Secondary School Community.  Also
   discussed was a document on Connectivity Models for schools.  It was
   decided that this document will be combined with the UserDoc2's
   document on how to connect, and will be put out as an I-D.
   The final agenda item was a review and revision of the group's
   charter.  After some discussion, three volunteers from three different
   countries agreed to craft the text for a new charter and post it to
   the list.  From there, the group will determine new deliverables and
   milestones.




Cooper                                                         [Page 40]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


   Networked Information Retrieval (NIR), chaired by Jill Foster and
   George Brett.  (Summary reported by Kevin Gamiel.)

   NIR is chartered to increase the useful base of information about
   networked information retrieval tools, their developers, interested
   organizations, and other activities that relate to the production,
   dissemination, and support of NIR tools.  NIR is a cooperative effort
   of the IETF, RARE, and CNI.

   Jim Fullton gave an overview of CNIDR.  Jill Foster gave a brief
   overview of the RARE ISUS work in the NIR area.  Anders Gillner
   discussed his work on the Eurogopher project.  This project involves
   establishing a subject-based as well as geographic-based Gopher
   infrastructure in Europe.  The group then spent most of the meeting
   editing the NIR report.  Major changes included the merging of the
   WAIS and freeWAIS sections, NCSA's Mosaic was moved under the WWW
   section, and the NLM sections were removed.  Various methods of
   publishing and maintaining this information online were discussed.
   Several suggestions for evaluating NIR tools was discussed.  It was
   decided to put together a simple checklist as the basis of the
   evaluation. There will be further discussion on the mailing list.  The
   charter was updated to remove the reference to documentation and
   training materials.


   The Network Information Services Infrastructure Working Group (NISI),
   chaired by April Marine and Pat Smith.  (Summary reported by April
   Marine.)

   NISI is exploring the requirements for common, shared Internet-wide
   network information services.  The goal is to develop an understanding
   for what is required to implement an information services
   "infrastructure" for the Internet.

   The NISI Working Group discussed two main topics.  First, comments on
   the current I-D were solicited and a discussion of the relationships
   between network information centers (NICs) ensued, resulting in
   suggested revisions to the document's diagram.  Secondly, the scope of
   recommendations for interactions between NICs when more than one are
   involved in helping a user were clarified.  The group benefitted
   greatly from the international input available in this forum and both
   documents currently in progress should be much improved.


   Network Training Materials (TRAINMAT), chaired by Ellen Hoffman and
   Jill Foster.  (Summary reported by Ellen Hoffman.)

   The Network Training Materials Working Group is chartered to enable



Cooper                                                         [Page 41]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


   the research community to make better use of the networked services.
   Towards this end, the Working Group will work to provide a
   comprehensive package of "mix and match" training materials for the
   broad academic community which will: 1) enable user support staff to
   train users to use the networked services and 2) provide users with
   self-paced learning material.  In the first instance, it will not deal
   with operational training.  This Working Group is the IETF component
   of a joint RARE/IETF group working on Network Training Materials.

   The meeting opened with introductions and descriptions of training
   activities in which each person is involved.  Jill Foster discussed
   the RARE ISUS Network Training Materials TF as well as the NISP/ITTI
   project at the University of Newcastle, UK.  The group reviewed data
   elements for the training materials catalog, and agreed on the general
   categories which Foster presented with a few suggested changes.  A
   small group will finalize the template and send it out to the list.
   Volunteers were recruited to work on the catalog.  Another project the
   group will pursue is a subject resource guide.  Issues in using the
   network to deliver interactive and multi-media training were
   discussed, with the possibility for developing multi-media pilots
   reviewed.  A demo of the materials developed at Newcastle was given by
   Jill Foster.


   User-Doc2, chaired by Ellen Hoffman and Lenore Jackson (not present).
   (Summary reported by Ellen Hoffman.)

   The User-Doc2 Working Group is preparing a revised bibliography of
   on-line and hard copy documents, reference materials, and training
   tools addressing general networking information and how to use the
   Internet.  The target audience includes those individuals who provide
   services to end users and end users themselves.

   The User Doc Working Group reviewed recent activities, including the
   release of FYI RFCs 19 and 20 since the last IETF meeting.  The archive,
   Introducing the Internet, has been updated, adding two additional
   documents and revising the Access Guide.  Four sites currently house
   copies of the archive, and others are encouraged to maintain it.  A
   discussion on documentation needs was held, staring with a talk by
   Bert Stals on activities by the ISUS Documentation group.  Issues
   relating to documentation in languages other than English and covering
   a more world-wide perspective in RFCs was covered.  The final topic was
   new activities, with two future FYI RFCs in the works.  These are a
   revision of FYI 3 which is to be finalized at the next meeting, and a
   new document on how to get connected which is just being started.






Cooper                                                         [Page 42]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


   Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI), chaired by Alan Emtage and Jim
   Fullton.  (Summary reported by Jim Fullton.)

   URI is chartered to define a set of standards for the encoding of
   system independent Resource Location and Identification information
   for the use of Internet information services.

   The URI Working Group met in three sessions to discuss various issues
   related to URLs, URNs and URCs.  The current URL proposal along with
   an amendment to expand the allowable character set was approved by a
   vote of 29 to 1.  A report on the Info Mesh was made by Karen Sollins.

   URNs were discussed in great detail.  Agreement was reached on the
   basic format of URNs as well as their content.  Sub elements of the
   URN remain undefined and will be discussed at the next IETF.

   A paper describing a proposed URM was discussed, as were proposals for
   the format of URCs.  A call for papers describing URMs and URCs was
   made, with discussion to be carried out on the list.  Next time: 1)
   Discuss URN sub fields, and 2) Discuss URC/URM formats.


   User Services Working Group (USWG) chaired by Joyce K. Reynolds.
   (Summary reported by JKRey.)

   The USWG provides a regular forum for people interested in all user
   services to identify and initiate projects designed to improve the
   quality of information available to end-users of the Internet.

   Joyce Reynolds reported on the IETF User Services Area activities
   including: Working Groups coming to closure and new Working groups
   starting up, new publications, and current user services related
   Internet-Drafts postings.

   April Marine led a discussion on an FYI RFC update; FYI 4 "FYI on
   Questions and Answers: Answers to Commonly asked "New Internet User"
   Questions", (Also RFC 1325), May 1992.  Bill Manning brought up a
   discussion on how to "empower" users to utilize and document tools.
   There also seems to be missing from the FYI RFC publications a series
   of notes that tries to address the manners and morals of the
   collective body.  Another topic that may need to be worked on in this
   forum is how to deal with the basics (e.g., How do "I" get attached?).

   Jill Foster presented an update on RARE activities, including a
   report on the RARE Information Services/User Services (ISUS)
   activities.





Cooper                                                         [Page 43]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


   David Sitman EARN (European Academic and Research Network)
   representative presented a discussion and review of EARN's "Guide to
   Network Resource Tools" in preparation for submission to the RFC
   Editor for FYI RFC publication.


   Whois and Network Information Lookup Service (WNILS), chaired by Joan
   Gargano.  (Summary reported by Joan Gargano.)

   The purpose of WNILS is to expand and define the standard for WHOIS
   services, to resolve issues associated with the variations in access,
   and to promote a consistent and predictable service across the
   network.

   Many attendees were new to the WNILS working group and requested
   an introduction to the Whois++ architecture.  Peter Deutsch presented
   an overview of the Whois++ architecture and design philosophy.  A
   lengthy discussion followed and the following additions to the
   protocol were requested.  Peter will incorporate the additional
   specifications and submit an I-D by July 30, 1993.

   Chris Weider also began his presentation with an overview of
   centroids.  Two problem areas were identified: a) Centroids don't
   scale for databases containing large quantities of unique data, and b)
   The potential exists for cycles or looping in queries because the
   directory is in a mesh configuration.  Chris agreed further work is
   needed on indexing but this first implementation should provide a
   functional system for existing datasets and a testbed for the
   limitations of this model.

   The recommended modifications to the Whois Protocol have been
   submitted as an I-D.  The host record section will be updated.  The
   goals and milestones will be updated to reflect the following: All
   draft papers will be submitted as I-Ds by the end of July.  Two
   working implementations of clients, servers and centroids will be
   available by September 30, 1993.















Cooper                                                         [Page 44]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


CALENDAR
--------

Readers are requested to send in dates of events that are appropriate
for this calendar section.  Please send your submissions to
(cooper@isi.edu).

1993 CALENDAR

     Nov 1-5         IETF Houston, TX.
     Nov 2-4         ANSI  X3S3.3, TBD
     Nov 2-4         EMAIL World
                     Contact: Einar Steffurd <stef@nma.com>
     Nov 9-13        IEEE802 Plenary, Crown Sterling Suites,
                     Ft. Lauderdale, FL
     Nov 15-19       Supercomputing 93, Portland, OR
     Dec 6-10        OIW, NIST, Gaithersburg, MD

1994 CALENDAR

     Feb 3-4         ISOC Symposium on network and Distributed
                     System Security, San Diego, (nessett@llnl.gov)
     Mar 29-Apr 1    IETF, Seattle, Washington
     Apr 6-8         National Net '94 in D.C.
     May 2-6         NetWorld+INTEROP 94, Las Vegas, Nevada
                     Dan Lynch (dlynch@interop.com)
     Jun 1-3         IFIP WG 6.5 ULPAA, Barcelona, Spain
                     Einar Stefferud (stef@nma.com)
     Jun 6-10        NetWorld+INTEROP 94, Berlin, Germany
                     Dan Lynch (dlynch@interop.com)
     Jul 25-29       NetWorld+INTEROP 94, Tokyo, Japan
                     Dan Lynch (dlynch@interop.com)
     Jul             IETF Toronto, Canada
     Aug 28-Sep 2    IFIP World Computer Congress
                     Hamburg, Germany; Contact: IFIP
     Aug 29-Sep 2    ACM SIGCOMM 94, UCL, London, England
                     Contact J. Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk. or ACM
     Sep 12-16       NetWorld+INTEROP 94, Atlanta, Georgia
                     Dan Lynch (dlynch@interop.com)
     Fall            IETF San Francisco, California
     Oct 24-28       NetWorld+INTEROP 94, Atlanta, Georgia
                     Dan Lynch (dlynch@interop.com)

1995 CALENDAR

     Sep 18-22       INTEROP95, San Francisco, CA
                     Dan Lynch (dlynch@interop.com)




Cooper                                                         [Page 45]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


1996 CALENDAR

     Sep 2-6         14th IFIP World Computer Congress
                     Canberra, Australia  Contact: IFIP

=======================================================================

                       RARE LIST OF MEETINGS
                        december 93 edition
                       ---------------------

Ref. RSec(93)381-ac

This list of meetings is provided for information. Many of the
meetings are closed or by invitation; if in doubt, please contact the
chair of the meeting or the RARE Secretariat. If you have
additions/corrections/comments, please mail Anne Cozanet (e.mail
address: cozanet@rare.nl).

**********************************************************************

MEETING/DATE                               LOCATION

RARE Executive Committee
------------------------
17 December                                Amsterdam (RARE Secretariat)
27 January (Joint meeting with EARN-EXEC)  Geneva
28 January                                 Geneva
29 March                                   Amsterdam (RARE Secretariat)

RARE Council of Administration
------------------------------
3/4 February 1994                          Brussels
19/20 May 1994                             Darmstadt
18/19 May 1995                             Tel Aviv

RARE Technical Committee
------------------------
17 January                                 Telephone Meeting
3/4 March                                  Amsterdam (RARE Secretariat)

RARE Working Groups
-------------------

RIPE
----
24-26 January                              Amsterdam (NIKHEF)
16-18 May                                  Amsterdam (NIKHEF)



Cooper                                                         [Page 46]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


VARIOUS
-------
Euro-CAIRN

DANTE Steering Committee
16 December                                Amsterdam (RARE Secretariat)

DANTE Shareholders
4 February                                 Brussels

EBONE Management Committee
21 December (TBC)                          Amsterdam (RARE Secretariat)
or 10 January (TBC)                        Copenhagen

EBONE Consortium of Contributing Organisations
January (TBD)

EAT (Ebone Action Team) + EOT (Ebone Operations Team)
28 February/1 March                        KTH Stockholm

Euro-CCIRN
TBD

CCIRN
20/21 June                                  TBD (in Europe)

INTERNET SOCIETY Board of Trustees
13/14 June                                  Prague

IETF
29 March - 1 April                          Seattle
July                                        Toronto
Autumn                                      San Francisco

EWOS
----
Technical Assembly
1-2 March                                   Brussels
17-18 May                                   Brussels
13-14 September                             Brussels
22-23 November                              Brussels

Steering Committee
14 December                                 Brussels
15 March                                    Brussels
7 June                                      Brussels
27 September                                Brussels
6 December                                  Brussels



Cooper                                                         [Page 47]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


Workshops
17-21 January                               Brussels
11-15 April                                 Brussels
27 June - 1 July                            Brussels
10-14 October                               Brussels

ECTUA
-----

ETSI
----
General Assembly
24/25 March                                 Nice, France
22/23 November                              Nice, France

Technical Assembly
21-23 March                                 Nice, France
21/22 June                                  Nice, France
18-20 October                               Nice, France

EARN
Board of Directors
18-19 May                                   Darmstadt

INET'94/JENC5 Track Leaders
17 February                                 Zuerich

INET'94/JENC5 Conference Committee
21 March                               Amsterdam (RARE Secretariat)

*******************************************************************
INET'94/ 5th Joint European Networking Conference (JENC5)

13 -> 17 June 1994                       Prague, Czech Republic

The annual conference of the Internet Society held in conjunction
with the 5th Joint European Networking Conference.

To be added to the conference email distribution list, send a
message to <inet-jenc-request@rare.nl>.

Deadline for submission of contributions and proposals for
demonstrations is 15 December 1993 - email <inet-jenc-sec@rare.nl>.

*******************************************************************
OTHER CONFERENCES

For some of the following events, full text information is available



Cooper                                                         [Page 48]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


from the RARE Document Store under the directory calendar, in which
case the file name is specified under the information presented below.
The files may be retrieved via:

anonymous FTP: ftp.rare.nl
Email        : server@rare.nl
Gopher       : gopher.rare.nl)


3rd SYMPOSIUM on HIGH SPEED NETWORKING FOR RESEARCH IN EUROPE
-------------------------------------------------------------

organised by RARE with support from the CEC
on 2 February 1994 in Brussels
*** CALL FOR PAPERS *** to be sent to the High Speed
Symposium Secretariat <hssec@rare.nl> before 21 November 1993.
Participation is free of charge; registration forms can be obtained
from <hssec@rare.nl>.  To be added to the symposium email distribution
list, send a message to <high-speed-request@rare.nl>.

INTERNET SOCIETY SYMPOSIUM ON NETWORK AND DISTRIBUTED SYSTEM SECURITY
---------------------------------------------------------------------
on 3 and 4 February 1994 at the Catamaran Hotel in San Diego,
California more information from Mr. Robert Shirey of the MITRE
Corporation, email <shirey@mitre.org> (also on RARE Document Store,
file name <isoc-security.03.02.94>)

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION NETWORKS AND DATA COMMUNICATIONS
------------------------------------------------------------------------

from 18 to 21 April 1994 in Funchal, Madeira Island, Portugal
*** CALL FOR PAPERS *** 46or information, please email
Prof. Pedro Veiga <pmv@inesc.pt>

MediaActive 94 - "Harnessing Multimedia for Higher Education"
-------------------------------------------------------------

from 4 till 6 May 1994
*** CALL FOR PAPERS *** deadline 10 January 1994
Email <MedAct94@uk.ac.livjm>

15TH INTERDISCIPLINARY WORKSHOP ON INFORMATICS AND PSYCHOLOGY
-------------------------------------------------------------
organised by the Computer Science Department of the Johannes Kepler
University Linz, Austria, in cooperation with the European
Association for Cognitive Ergonomics (EACE)
from 24 till 26 May 1994 in Schaerding, Austria
*** CALL FOR PAPERS *** deadline 15 January 1994



Cooper                                                         [Page 49]

Internet Monthly Report                                    November 1993


46or further information, contact Michel Tauber
<tauber@uni-paderborn.de>.

NORDUnet 94
-----------
from 31 May to 2 June 1994
in Umea, Sweden
for information, email <nordunet94@umdac.umu.se>

ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY - ECT 94
--------------------------------------------
4th International Russian Forum
organised by the Academy of National Economy of Moscow, Russia; the
International Centre for Scientific and Technical Information; and
the Russian-American JV "Ecotrends".
from 27 June till 2 July
*** CALL FOR PAPERS *** deadline 15 January 1994
46or further information, contact Juri Gornostaev or Juri Andrianov
Email <enir@ccic.icsti.msk.su>

ACM SIGCOMM'94
--------------
Communications Architectures, Protocols and Applications
organised by University College London
from 31 August till 2 September
(Tutorials and Workshops on 30 August)
***CALL FOR PAPERS*** deadline 1 February 1994
46or further information, contact <J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk>

NETWORK SERVICES CONFERENCE 94 (provisional)
------------------------------
from 18 to 20 October 1994
in Bournemouth (UK)

**********************************************************************
EUROPEAN ELECTRONIC MESSAGING ASSOCIATION (EEMA)

**********************************************************************













Cooper                                                         [Page 50]