Re: Last call: draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-16.txt

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Tue, 27 August 2013 17:28 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991FB11E8243 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:28:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.533
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.533 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.066, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xLHEpZ-Zs3En for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:28:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D4E11E81CC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.139.183]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7RHS6NF017540 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:28:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1377624499; bh=D+fenJjiqSI+UyptUKXdSsf7ZnRnxHDMlZr5J5y/3OE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=H7Tla303wGRokLFyPkLEdFcnyvIBPsVGhN8dWtbQpsC1QgXEKeGfJrTT0Jh64Gbva v4ox7vfE+BAeDRxBjBRYDDr9aSv9WKvPfp6OOBEgBafvIshfOCwetxtOSbVJhpIw8t Y9t6wicfHNSS6hBIRCpIKNYPMSJzXxZ34/4YJcCM=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1377624499; i=@elandsys.com; bh=D+fenJjiqSI+UyptUKXdSsf7ZnRnxHDMlZr5J5y/3OE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=J1ezLFZYXMTAmlR9xE2YT+5TQKCtUkNumOn2kdTUlOn1kla4icX6DzlHVw9qpwUu6 8DX08A5U8BITG7FERenQXuQ8+F57lhLQfLdJv6ksGvBCHkow6n7bdFSAnM08q5ZioR 0VzWwTSiSu8IWquZXU/cXndMbMvyGrSoMyV3UiYU=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130827080040.0d579578@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 08:20:54 -0700
To: Mary Barnes <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: Last call: draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-16.txt
In-Reply-To: <CABmDk8nmQLY1mBbpECjo7KLULXyEvXYNgDiOVjuH6mgy-sDL9w@mail.g mail.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130720193906.06cdd008@resistor.net> <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD2338DD2606@XMB104ADS.rim.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20130721070808.0c808140@elandnews.com> <CABmDk8nmQLY1mBbpECjo7KLULXyEvXYNgDiOVjuH6mgy-sDL9w@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: John C Klensin <john@jck.com>, tbray@textuality.com, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:28:28 -0000

Hi Mary,
At 07:28 27-08-2013, Mary Barnes wrote:
>As far as the IPR, as the shepherd and DISPATCH WG co-chair, I 
>posted a note to the DISPATCH WG mailing list before progressing 
>this document to see if anyone had any concerns about the IPR 
>disclosures, which had been discussed in the past and were updated 
>when I asked the authors the requisite questions about IPR while 
>doing the PROTO write-up.  No concerns were raised with regards to 
>the updated IPR disclosures (i.e., no one responded to that 
>email).     And, you can google  "draft montemurro ietf ipr 
>archives" to find past discussions such as this one:  draft 
>montemurro ietf ipr archives

Thanks for the feedback.  Somebody commented that:

   "It has nothing to do with IPR which was extensively discussed on
    the dispatch list."

I read the DISPATCH mailing list archives.  I did not see that 
extensive discussion.  My comment was about that.  I do not have any 
problem with the document shepherd comments.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy