IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: wrt draft-ietf-uta-email-tls-certs

=JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com> Tue, 09 February 2016 23:01 UTC

Return-Path: <Jeff.Hodges@kingsmountain.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170841B2D74 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 15:01:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.667
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NpiIvAihu4Yf for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 15:01:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.23.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EE6E31A01E2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 15:01:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 17756 invoked by uid 0); 9 Feb 2016 22:54:22 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw4) (10.0.90.85) by gproxy4.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 9 Feb 2016 22:54:22 -0000
Received: from box514.bluehost.com ([74.220.219.114]) by cmgw4 with id GNuJ1s00D2UhLwi01NuMVi; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 15:54:22 -0700
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=IekUBwaa c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=9W6Fsu4pMcyimqnCr1W0/w==:117 a=9W6Fsu4pMcyimqnCr1W0/w==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=XYUc-DgfXtMA:10 a=9tUH4c3xL5QA:10 a=jFJIQSaiL_oA:10 a=if04g1JBzo4RhVS9fgEA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=dAP0EeUJRA4A:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kingsmountain.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:Cc:To; bh=EgSEaCTWtRY0QnzdOSOP2VRzykxQR9QaZU2ay2+D0fI=; b=4haP9q83qdjthvwpInLIIsXMQcjjIPXFBhgmSVvRC+q+vcqHNNB4DrHMXKIelT4Cb/fhDxriyRGE90+pgIpektunK60S4QIAcZP4zzo2hU+zdaF2EujDFJCU+cSbYnuw;
Received: from [70.213.12.47] (port=17785 helo=[10.0.0.1]) by box514.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>) id 1aTHAo-00083c-1A; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 15:54:18 -0700
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
From: =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
Subject: Re: wrt draft-ietf-uta-email-tls-certs
Message-ID: <56BA6E10.9050707@KingsMountain.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 14:54:08 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {11025:box514.bluehost.com:kingsmou:kingsmountain.com} {sentby:smtp auth 70.213.12.47 authed with jeff.hodges+kingsmountain.com}
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/qOblbEJUAQVEjTPvZfIy9OysXDc>
Cc: uta@ietf.org, uta-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-uta-email-tls-certs@ietf.org, IETF Discussion List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 23:01:05 -0000

 >> This seems to me to be clearly "updating" or "profiling" RFC6125
 >> normative language, in the specific email use case.
 >
 > Profiling it for email, yes.  Why should that make it *update* the
 > document that specifies the general process?  Profiles need to
 > normatively reference what they profile, but not the other way 'round.

OK, I can live with that.  Thanks for the clarification,

=JeffH

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email