Re: Bloated messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Aug 16 14:36:38 2020

"John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Mon, 17 August 2020 16:43 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A423A121E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 09:43:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GbdFHJYgA76Y for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 09:43:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FEA03A0D42 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 09:43:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 21961 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2020 16:43:05 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=55c7.5f3ab399.k2008; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=8Cg63pVNJeJ5NHpZORUlinh9te29XfK65v8e+aIPWaA=; b=vlEWInX3VhONHLtdT86QLy4U9I9lNnY3esN1Cw/RoGtk7PoCX4bz/m73HDzED5loMuQ7K/mZeXkfE4k9+bWzXU5otceMRNf2bnRR+APAxBc5fosJCjMKWeCFCq/XTnLElqxzbydd+6BdVbSftkz/EwHZIAwANlvHXtGH7bBkSRq90sUK+1krtPjv4DJWBwdqfddZyGM6CH/BtKQFaVhGDxpRhDd0Ggz/251NvzKPjsppgw9pul9dVRCkqDlFvgovUJceOpdX3NxZrzza3bgx6Vmy8pdJsDk5iQIcw5ECfvB5bGmoktrqi7c9BC0sFP6/PCQ4LZv3uLto15J7af4dYA==
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP6; 17 Aug 2020 16:43:05 -0000
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 12:43:04 -0400
Message-ID: <669b6bae-264f-139f-f71-ad476d253b@iecc.com>
From: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Bloated messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Aug 16 14:36:38 2020
In-Reply-To: <698BE28A-79EC-499D-8093-B96CAF14212E@akamai.com>
References: <20200816183616.82404.qmail@submit.iecc.com> <CAA=duU2EvupW-+w0QLTBKZN2WRkyTrs7Zv8nZLhzg4vhYNv6+A@mail.gmail.com> <5F3A515D.5020805@btconnect.com> <5F3AAA69.9040807@btconnect.com> <698BE28A-79EC-499D-8093-B96CAF14212E@akamai.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/reeeeOyRhKeFfCKUZ9cS2Ro346o>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:43:16 -0000

> Does it matter about mail headers, etc.?  The point is to look at number of postings and relative size.  As long as all measurements are done at the same place, that's fine.

Of course.

There is a long tradition of old-timers grousing about how bloated modern 
mail messages have become.  On the one hand they're right, turning 2K of 
text into 50K of bloat is silly.  On the other hand, people less set in 
their ways than we are find it normal and useful that they can format 
their mail the same way they can format any other document.  And on the 
third hand, in a world of streaming video, the total storage and bandwidth 
that mail uses, bloat and all, is a rounding error.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

PS: in response to several requests, next week's summary will be sorted 
by number of messages rather than size.