Re: Naming convention for a WG I-D that returns to

hm.... do you think Olaf Kolkman has misspelled his name, or what?

and draft-ietf-sip-manyfolks is *formally* correct.

draft-ymbk has tradition, but it's likely to be crushed under the wheel of 
procedural correctness once the present batch is gone.

I don't know whether stopping "manyfolks" is right or not.

                 harald

--On 30. juli 2004 09:34 -0700 Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@nokia.com> wrote:

> Bill,
>
> At 03:46 AM 7/30/2004, Bill Manning wrote:
>
>> clearly different rules apply, depending on whom makes the submission.
>>
>> for example, several individual submissions were made before this
>> IETF and we (the authors) were told that we -MUST- use the name of
>> one of th eauthors in the draft name... however, we see that other
>> individual submissions are allowed to fabricate ID lables that do not
>> reflect any of the authors or any WG.  e.g.
>>
>> draft-ymbk-downref-03.txt
>> draft-kolkman-dnsext-dnssec-in-band-rollover-00
>
> There are also some drafts by someone called "manyfolks":
>
>    draft-manyfolks-sipping-ToIP-01.txt
>    draft-manyfolks-nsis-nslp-QSpec-00.txt
>    draft-ietf-sip-manyfolks-resource-07.txt
>
> Bob
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf