Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based
Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Mon, 07 May 2012 15:53 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8769021F85D1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 May 2012 08:53:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fvXTJlJGgPjd for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 May 2012 08:53:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scss.tcd.ie (hermes.scss.tcd.ie [IPv6:2001:770:10:200:889f:cdff:fe8d:ccd2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8214721F85D5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 May 2012 08:53:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hermes.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6777157D25; Mon, 7 May 2012 16:53:22 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:date:message-id:received :received:x-virus-scanned; s=cs; t=1336406002; bh=vi6YjDgVw8O/gH xn8Wfhlm/+7j7CZyOnbjqIIe1t+dU=; b=MkvQr3ZPWc5dLQ+43Ez9AKhj38yfNl B6vSkAtEGMPjR0FDmIYuNR4rZtX7PI4A8QgfY3GJiICX6ie4S58pZfFGDz3sscAT liCzQf7psH0p2mBYY3LhKU6kfOBss4ifIQUJaSla6Unl+sqbKwNrfz8tCQa7Bdom 7h1fkj+cTP7miiq1VeHW6eEecXcMiWaayffMZYAqv0+1XLU3NuTdNITQlA9xV3Qo /dkP0NMrTSW/5cfP58UMZWGz30SJk2jwuks6lrks2jUdht5lyRauNm/VMupsOITX gFZ7T3Sc5VlDVBqVcTCRXTlKnjbVlaAL2WYVxxzzg/6hBGwpJs6l6r5A==
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with ESMTP id qNRMo9zBEPyE; Mon, 7 May 2012 16:53:22 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.87.48.9] (unknown [86.46.17.170]) by smtp.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5FA1E157D22; Mon, 7 May 2012 16:53:21 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <4FA7EFF1.9080803@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 16:53:21 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Markku Savela <Markku.Savela@vtt.fi>
Subject: Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based
References: <01OE8FJG30ZM00ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com> <201204130359.q3D3xlG0007556@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp> <01OE9150IMNI00ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com> <CAMm+LwgP7FTA=B2Q6=mke6Vu_hVRN=p06_BL98SdW04j31UOqQ@mail.gmail.com> <27A5BF91-C082-4FB4-8D6E-B68F725440EC@nic.cz> <CAMm+Lwg4J-XDMdC1CMycm2FA4-Of-0Ee-u2VW3hqtUDY3+VZ5g@mail.gmail.com> <4FA7CAA2.8030003@vtt.fi>
In-Reply-To: <4FA7CAA2.8030003@vtt.fi>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 15:53:24 -0000
On 05/07/2012 02:14 PM, Markku Savela wrote: > On 05/07/2012 03:52 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: >> So far I don't see any interest in production deployment other than >> our own plans so I don't think your working group consensus has >> relevance. > > The draft is for TLS, but it occurs to me to ponder.. would > similar approach work for IPsec IKEv2 as an alternative to > verify endpoints? IPsec is in the WG charter, [1] but there's been zero energy for that so far. I believe the chairs plan to poll the WG about that kind of thing once the current spec is out the door. So, if you're interested in that, sign up to the WG list. S [1] http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dane/charters > > >
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> … SM
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> … Dave Cridland
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-1… Dave Cridland
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-1… Ondřej Surý
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-1… Ondřej Surý
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-1… Peter Palfrader
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-1… Ondřej Surý
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-1… Ondřej Surý
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-1… ned+ietf
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-1… Martin Rex
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-1… SM
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-1… Martin Rex
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-1… ned+ietf
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-1… Paul Wouters
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-1… John Gilmore
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-1… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-1… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-1… Paul Wouters
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-1… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-1… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-1… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-1… Ondřej Surý
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-1… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-1… Markku Savela
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-1… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-1… Paul Wouters