RE: SRV records considered dubious
Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Fri, 24 November 2006 08:27 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GnWOm-0000uY-V4; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 03:27:04 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GnWOl-0000pm-1e for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 03:27:03 -0500
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([158.38.152.233]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GnWOf-0004Hj-Am for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 03:27:02 -0500
Received: from localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A1012580D0; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:23:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24241-01; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:23:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [172.28.60.143] (unknown [62.92.16.50]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832972580C8; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:23:44 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:26:50 +0100
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>, "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
Message-ID: <FB776BD62B91563E93148648@[172.28.60.143]>
In-Reply-To: <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD37E7E74C@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
References: <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD37E7E74C@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.6 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8b30eb7682a596edff707698f4a80f7d
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: RE: SRV records considered dubious
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
--On 23. november 2006 08:18 -0800 "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com> wrote: > The draft is incomplete. It does not review all the technical options. > These were raised on the DNSEXT list months ago. Where's the draft? > > If you want there to be consensus on a draft then it has to put all the > options fairly. > > If you want to refer to the draft as an authority you have to consider > all the options. Where's the draft? (of the options, not of -dns-choices) > > >> I also do not agree that the document should not proceed >> without addressing the pointer mechanism. The document is not >> of the type that specifies new solutions, it documents >> tradeoffs. If your pointer mechanism would be more than >> 'mail-ware' (i.e. had sufficient review and consensus) then >> it could have been part of the equation. I think that its to >> late for that. > > How is it going to have review if the editors refuse to consider it? > Where's the draft? Something that is not documented even as an internet-draft cannot be seriously considered in a review of current options line -choices. Harald _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Re: SRV records considered dubious John C Klensin
- RE: SRV records considered dubious Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: SRV records considered dubious Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: SRV records considered dubious Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: SRV records considered dubious Tony Finch
- Re: SRV records considered dubious Keith Moore
- RE: SRV records considered dubious Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: SRV records considered dubious Olaf M. Kolkman
- RE: SRV records considered dubious Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: SRV records considered dubious Harald Alvestrand
- RE: SRV records considered dubious Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: SRV records considered dubious Frank Ellermann
- Non-terminal-wildcards Re: SRV records considered… Olaf M. Kolkman