Jabber at IETF107 and a thank you
Robert Moskowitz <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com> Fri, 27 March 2020 14:20 UTC
Return-Path: <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43CCF3A0A44 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 07:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p0dVmcmZuije for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 07:20:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [23.123.122.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F2D73A0A28 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 07:20:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E9FB6214B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:20:49 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at htt-consult.com
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id fEzfMBHup8hn for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:20:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lx140e.htt-consult.com (unknown [192.168.160.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1087F62134 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:20:43 -0400 (EDT)
To: "ietf@ietf.org Discussion" <ietf@ietf.org>
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com>
Subject: Jabber at IETF107 and a thank you
Message-ID: <4d27d67a-c43e-8d96-2a0b-136689d831c0@htt-consult.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:20:30 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/sMZdExcpklHc8ltWZNuvlmVFvwM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 14:20:52 -0000
First I want to thank all the people that worked hard to make this first ever virtual IETF a reality. ;) I hope it is the last we need, as there was a lot missing, but there are a lot of take-aways to make in-person IETFs better and to perhaps make remote participation in in-person IETFs a richer experience. In My Not So Humble Opinion EVERYONE should get Jabber working and join in the Jabber for their session. Maybe it was always this way, and I never Jabbered, as I was in the session room, but this week Jabber was used for side discussions about the slide material without interupting the speaker. I feel that valuable information was exchanged and maybe some questions answered well in the Jabber rather than at the mike and were thus captured in the Jabber log. Jabber should be a regular activity for all session attendees. The Hallway Jabber was kind of nice. Lots of people in the Hallway but little jabbering. It did give a sense of connection and was a bit fun. It is an interesting question how to make something like this work for remote participants in the future. The WebEx worked reasonably well. Lots of fumbling with slides, but that was expected. Will MeetEcho scale up to a couple hundred remote participants per session? Well when we have in-person, probably only a few sessions will have that many remotes. Etherpad seemed to work better than in the past. I applaud note takers; I am terrible at it. If more jabbered their comments, the notetaker's job SHOULD be earier. Every presenter: Remember to number your slides! (I did not, oops). We had participants that were not recieving the slides on WebEx and someone in Jabber was telling them which slide was showing so they could view the slides locally. More of grey-hairs (so to include those that do not have facial grey hair) will be looking to remote participation rather than expend retirement benefits for all the travel costs, so we can expect to see more non-attendees attending if the experience was like it was this week. Again, thanks to all involved. Thanks to all participants to making the efforts of those that did the work being worthwhile. My plane fhlight hoem was uneventful and now I have to get busy reving drafts per session discussions. See you around the cookie table next time! Bob
- Jabber at IETF107 and a thank you Robert Moskowitz
- Re: Jabber at IETF107 and a thank you Toerless Eckert
- Re: Jabber at IETF107 and a thank you Vittorio Bertola
- Re: Jabber at IETF107 and a thank you Toerless Eckert
- Re: Jabber at IETF107 and a thank you Paul Hoffman
- Re: Jabber at IETF107 and a thank you Carsten Bormann
- Re: Jabber at IETF107 and a thank you Pete Resnick
- Re: Jabber at IETF107 and a thank you Michael Richardson
- Re: Jabber at IETF107 and a thank you Robert Moskowitz
- Re: Jabber at IETF107 and a thank you Donald Eastlake
- Re: Jabber at IETF107 and a thank you Robert Moskowitz
- Re: Jabber at IETF107 and a thank you Keith Moore
- Re: Jabber at IETF107 and a thank you Carsten Bormann