Re: humour area reviewers and IESG members

[Benjamin Kaduk <[e-mail]>]

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 08:08:21AM -0400, John C Klensin wrote:
> 
> 
> Because the April 1 documents are usually considered part of the
> Series but not part of any particular stream, it is not clear
> how the proposed changes would affect them.  I do suggest that
> giving them separate names and numbers would vastly weaken their
> effects (I note that the "avian carrier" documents have
> sometimes been mistaken for Internet Standards too).

On the "usually" point, someone does have to deal with errata reports on
them.  For the modern ones (postdating the concept of streams), I gather
that such reports go to the ISE.  For what it's worth (probably not much).

-Ben