Re: List of Old Standards to be retired
Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@columbia.edu> Mon, 20 December 2004 05:34 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA14553; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 00:34:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CgGKW-0006JO-Nq; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 00:43:36 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CgG7L-0003bc-00; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 00:29:59 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CgG6S-0003Rs-Jy for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 00:29:04 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA14234 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 00:29:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from serrano.cc.columbia.edu ([128.59.206.20] ident=cu41754) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CgGFe-0006C8-QH for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 00:38:35 -0500
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (24-193-46-55.nyc.rr.com [24.193.46.55]) (user=jaltman mech=PLAIN bits=0) by serrano.cc.columbia.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iBK5T0po001165 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 20 Dec 2004 00:29:01 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <41C66392.9080102@columbia.edu>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 00:30:58 -0500
From: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@columbia.edu>
Organization: Not Affiliated with Columbia University in the City of New York
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: old-standards@alvestrand.no
References: <41C175A6.9020804@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <41C175A6.9020804@cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.6.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
X-No-Spam-Score: Local
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.48 on 128.59.206.20
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 36c793b20164cfe75332aa66ddb21196
Cc: "'newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu'" <newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: List of Old Standards to be retired
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0982625069=="
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7da5a831c477fb6ef97f379a05fb683c
Eliot Lear wrote: > If you see a document on the list below and you know it to be in use, > would you please reply to this message indicating the RFC number, and > whether you believe the doc should be advanced beyond proposed? Also, > if you know of work to update anything on the list below, please include > that. A note along these lines is generally sufficient to remove a > document from the list below. I am a fairly good contact point for most things "TELNET". Back in June 1999 the Application Area Directors, Keith Moore and Patrik Falstrom, performed a review of TELNET RFCs to move unused ones to HISTORIC. This was done in consultation with the subscribers to the telnet-wg@bsdi.com mailing list. All of the remaining Telnet options were determined to be implemented in various widely deployed implementations. > RFC0698 Telnet extended ASCII option > RFC0726 Remote Controlled Transmission and Echoing Telnet option > RFC0727 Telnet logout option > RFC0735 Revised Telnet byte macro option > RFC0736 Telnet SUPDUP option > RFC0749 Telnet SUPDUP-Output option > RFC0779 Telnet send-location option > RFC0885 Telnet end of record option > RFC0927 TACACS user identification Telnet option > RFC0933 Output marking Telnet option > RFC0946 Telnet terminal location number option > RFC1041 Telnet 3270 regime option > RFC1043 Telnet Data Entry Terminal option: DODIIS implementation > RFC1053 Telnet X.3 PAD option > RFC1372 Telnet Remote Flow Control Option Since the requirement for moving to historic under the cruft draft is that it is not widely implemented, all of these options must remain. If there is desire to move these options to historic, then the guideline must be altered. Jeffrey Altman
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- List of Old Standards to be retired Eliot Lear
- Re: List of Old Standards to be retired Carsten Bormann
- Re: List of Old Standards to be retired James M. Polk
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired Margaret Wasserman
- Re: List of Old Standards to be retired Alexey Melnikov
- Re: List of Old Standards to be retired Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired Carsten Bormann
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired Carsten Bormann
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired Eliot Lear
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired George Swallow
- Re: List of Old Standards to be retired Eliot Lear
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired Bob Braden
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired Bob Braden
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired Bob Braden
- Re: List of Old Standards to be retired Eric Rosen
- Re: List of Old Standards to be retired Vijay Devarapalli
- Re: List of Old Standards to be retired Vernon Schryver
- Re: [newtrk] Re: List of Old Standards to be reti… Eliot Lear
- Re: [newtrk] Re: List of Old Standards to be reti… Pekka Savola
- Re: List of Old Standards to be retired William Allen Simpson
- Re: [newtrk] Re: List of Old Standards to be reti… Eric Rosen
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired William Allen Simpson
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired stanislav shalunov
- Re: [newtrk] Re: List of Old Standards to be reti… John C Klensin
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [newtrk] Re: List of Old Standards to be reti… Pekka Savola
- Re: [newtrk] Re: List of Old Standards to be reti… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Old-standards] Re: [newtrk] List of Old Stan… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [Old-standards] Re: [newtrk] List of Old Stan… Pekka Savola
- Re: [Old-standards] Re: [newtrk] List of Old Stan… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Old-standards] Re: [newtrk] List of Old Stan… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Why old-standards (Re: List of Old Standards to b… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [newtrk] Re: List of Old Standards to be reti… Eric Rosen
- Re: [Old-standards] Re: [newtrk] List of Old Stan… William Allen Simpson
- Historic (Re: List of Old Standards to be retired) Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [newtrk] Re: List of Old Standards to be reti… John C Klensin
- Re: [newtrk] Why old-standards (Re: List of Old S… John C Klensin
- Re: Why old-standards (Re: List of Old Standards … William Allen Simpson
- Re: Why old-standards (Re: List of Old Standards … JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: [Old-standards] Re: [newtrk] List of Old Stan… John C Klensin
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired John C Klensin
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired William Allen Simpson
- Re: Historic (Re: List of Old Standards to be ret… William Allen Simpson
- Re: [Old-standards] Re: [newtrk] List of Old Stan… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [Old-standards] Re: [newtrk] List of Old Stan… John C Klensin
- Re: [newtrk] Why old-standards (Re: List of Old S… Eliot Lear
- Re: Why old-standards (Re: List of Old Standards … Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [newtrk] Why old-standards (Re: List of Old S… John C Klensin
- Re: Why old-standards (Re: List of Old Standards … William Allen Simpson
- Re: Why old-standards (Re: List of Old Standards … Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [Old-standards] Re: [newtrk] List of Old Stan… Sam Hartman
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired Sam Hartman
- Re: List of Old Standards to be retired Jeffrey Altman
- RE: [newtrk] Re: List of Old Standards to be reti… Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [newtrk] Why old-standards (Re: List of Old S… Scott W Brim