Re: Is it hypocritical? [Re: Further update on authenticating to use the IETF Network at IETF 125 Shenzhen]
Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Thu, 19 March 2026 00:30 UTC
Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA719CD5A093 for <ietf@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 17:30:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3_bQ68mMwXxr for <ietf@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 17:30:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1029.google.com (mail-pj1-x1029.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1029]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F225BCD59E59 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 17:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1029.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-3591cc98871so60929a91.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 17:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1773880217; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20240605; b=CtptdLQZjZED7jHxXpMia9xkxEZoNwo659uph76uGbfqJBL33ZTjfx0KqvvX8xYZoF aXdeyNDx/voZunOyENb/Qnn7JREBSlXJUoX0BwYAG34n0xccCqKxkbLx2/Ymnkn+V5LO Q9QWGHYv0nEWAk7ayurFw9FteMqIGFBXI0sbTo51OzZTwGutX9MitX0uCmvzkiwFO+II K3DUcovwe7eIzjAXVhh9ubdnVEmXOG4zaMMvAcCGCAKu8qd4+QLLbDw5SBaHl+tN7CWH uD+dzeFur7DQEbUd6hPlLglTcf67PqxvRjH3ABsEvq/pi4yQNQRBu0EoE+yxS30nLkhL XxdA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20240605; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=ynCmkNTblGF7+Flx3t2nUUFng5mMLh4w6IrcrD7R4fY=; fh=GQBlyYSClmc2OOi7demww/S7/43ziorQOin7SnJfFVg=; b=gPFbjTosdaxiHIyIjkoh96/5EaJlEMkDm00K4wwoBwT//tz4Co9NOpwmgULuksksSA wbKyHIN7fuoOywIzMQV8eBWs1GmnbMLqKSTZGCwnFCx707W/xqQD8CuJDARyw7kdEtVC 4APg6mrh9hhglyChrcegxtZMioz6j8yR608klchVX+p+yv4ij3d6OyVlMpVQoK7RqIsq QrCkBJA2ORrWIa4GpevYwRLs7Fq8FQSpgyxeXV46inr9ExjID+I5mu94w8ADQqyi3wko yTA3sRGwfV4xm2YvTZHfZEl221AzuabifGppu1e9jintGCmF7q8BypmhAfZ9EdYWGr5D cvvg==; darn=ietf.org
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1773880217; x=1774485017; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ynCmkNTblGF7+Flx3t2nUUFng5mMLh4w6IrcrD7R4fY=; b=Grf7O/px106wh7r0XIa8+dtZkD5rPvoOQWFPMPJ4Ba2PELZsFWT5UGf0r2gcskdToH m3CIy6D7veAkFXTvVChTK2UGH6g7ox4/eU8dRdVFi4pgcV+k1ouXgDr9/taz0maTtQGo 0g0p8ruoGcyG5uSdMrHFb/chmeSRkye3ALHstJ5LjxklykDltYKJMDwRe95wDjOL0Ibk bY23HyavlsJPhc3t7tHlSMxYQf+96AJUjgAecB/jR/GTCWtKi6bR0JyqA8p0oAu4ITZU TySUOkakgTR6sW+aRAiJDNaa8/lwPFvddkEuyrgwY/GxFLWkPatub5mP+mH6VfvKrF9M Kn4g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1773880217; x=1774485017; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ynCmkNTblGF7+Flx3t2nUUFng5mMLh4w6IrcrD7R4fY=; b=iYcfW0rkluZaL0aVP6g9277b7VuYcb7MFDOAh4Y1NGqCw2FLu7SH50rD1sRwY8mwH4 qSeVW/AT4ZH1EaxlHElKAhh6DdsOZCiRJTce9R3CA2XnaL50ENGCWqeU3ZJm+qeKS6Z3 FBSU+pRac5IGiWvokka1OdmJecHNbbvBHRK+YAgJd2dw77p6MIcDgBh5dv/Nonl/ot9Q gfeGhHqGGv8RfoS8KfBp+o/lporYMIskNkJJhfA6VKWZb+OIpQL/O5LyLkKcoxFeADi8 MC1M9SOh/eByRl51+MM1r6W2k5h1HdXNu3NLzXqvy8TNnI8F2lQZhMMLhHRlIalLSHfl VktQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx+hqhEqjFNpEb/z92DPJI6Zb1F0gKMmxxfBCrcDfWzupAUNJCv fRKdWYUmIuWp9wG9lIu008fXJGd6T8uY3rRDZYMG/qXmgPuplxfNqdoM8fp46iYIltnnOgIFzai mQ7GpZuB/VGkyexdY0GChglzbeYjj9vTzNgyArFE=
X-Gm-Gg: ATEYQzzzKJEcz4IXcjCcDJKJEJXIgfNYogiL1H3ZqgaCBbhgd3e/PVJ3PYM/vT63MLh PBPUGrIs5ELteMetv1bmI474kdFfLpZTj1wEFpRm5Hk8mnpkOb7X0N1zwvKZiwL3E5RWcJ2K491 WAqA2I4YEw1jxH70i4xL8/5Ah8AH58l0tBz5KzL69YH10uQXRTkeFQA5CuI7r25d0NDga4GUbcZ 9j5PTgUZOkFsA6yJhQVg3G4g+4N6Sme5GVQcOO/5zTv8PV8AgXB4o1MNHpdcHYMMfiQ4FU2s3ID OBeDE1SL2t41Z4G/72yfhsE3gWls3Ou+/Jbg+w==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1e47:b0:35b:a7be:ae43 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-35bb9e57d72mr4568159a91.9.1773880216919; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 17:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 17:30:05 -0700
X-Gm-Features: AaiRm50wOxhsz8m6ROa5uagHV3CQejPnZCadvHreD0oQy61oBzQHQeFnKGZitRI
Message-ID: <CAChr6SwaHUAKKCLHmLLA0oEEF_qSA_gbZeHXRsr8v-7sG-UewA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Is it hypocritical? [Re: Further update on authenticating to use the IETF Network at IETF 125 Shenzhen]
To: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000342194064d55ac19"
Message-ID-Hash: 3KMBKWF6YJUCPUQBW3X6ILWH3GVZFDXV
X-Message-ID-Hash: 3KMBKWF6YJUCPUQBW3X6ILWH3GVZFDXV
X-MailFrom: sayrer@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ietf.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/siLoJb4uJmWq4mRhIYciNvznw_M>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-leave@ietf.org>
Hi, Are you there, in China? It should be clear that "different network access policy from the general populace" is not a precise line. This is obvious to a casual visitor. thanks, Rob
- Re: Is it hypocritical? [Re: Further update on au… Rob Sayre
- Re: Further update on authenticating to use the I… Michael StJohns
- Re: Further update on authenticating to use the I… Jay Daley
- Re: Further update on authenticating to use the I… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: Further update on authenticating to use the I… Jay Daley
- Re: Further update on authenticating to use the I… Michael StJohns
- Re: Further update on authenticating to use the I… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Further update on authenticating to use the I… S Moonesamy
- Re: Further update on authenticating to use the I… S Moonesamy
- Re: Further update on authenticating to use the I… Samir Srivastava
- Re: Further update on authenticating to use the I… IETF Executive Director
- Re: Further update on authenticating to use the I… Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo
- Re: Further update on authenticating to use the I… S Moonesamy
- Re: Further update on authenticating to use the I… Salz, Rich
- Re: Further update on authenticating to use the I… Toerless Eckert
- Re: Further update on authenticating to use the I… Stewart Bryant
- Is it hypocritical? [Re: Further update on authen… Christian Hopps
- Re: Is it hypocritical? [Re: Further update on au… Ross Finlayson
- Re: Is it hypocritical? [Re: Further update on au… Peter Thomassen
- Re: Is it hypocritical? [Re: Further update on au… John C Klensin
- Re: Is it hypocritical? [Re: Further update on au… Eliot Lear
- Re: Is it hypocritical? [Re: Further update on au… John C Klensin
- Experiences with IETF125 Network [was Re: Is it h… Bob Hinden
- Re: Is it hypocritical? [Re: Further update on au… S Moonesamy
- RE: Is it hypocritical? [Re: Further update on au… Adrian Farrel
- Re: Is it hypocritical? [Re: Further update on au… Christian Hopps
- Re: Is it hypocritical? [Re: Further update on au… Toerless Eckert
- Re: Is it hypocritical? [Re: Further update on au… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Is it hypocritical? [Re: Further update on au… Christian Hopps
- Re: Is it hypocritical? [Re: Further update on au… Joel Halpern
- Re: Is it hypocritical? [Re: Further update on au… David Lake
- Re: Is it hypocritical? [Re: Further update on au… marka
- Re: Is it hypocritical? [Re: Further update on au… David Lake
- Re: Is it hypocritical? [Re: Further update on au… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: Is it hypocritical? [Re: Further update on au… David Lake
- Re: Is it hypocritical? [Re: Further update on au… S Moonesamy
- RE: Is it hypocritical? [Re: Further update on au… S Moonesamy