Re: >1 Day One Day Passes

Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com> Thu, 25 February 2010 03:39 UTC

Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:40:26 -0800
From: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Subject: Re: >1 Day One Day Passes
In-Reply-To: <4B85D75F.4030809@dcrocker.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.63.1002241938470.28916@pita.cisco.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1002241402530.18807@egate.xpasc.com> <0A31E659-2AF2-4FBE-976E-C44AA757FD21@amsl.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1002241651080.18807@egate.xpasc.com> <Pine.GSO.4.63.1002241710350.4277@pita.cisco.com> <4B85D75F.4030809@dcrocker.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: The IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>

Dave,

This is what we have surveys for. I'll let Ray summarize the findings 
and I'm sure this will be a topic for discussion at the plenary too.

Ole

Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher,  The Internet Protocol Journal
Cisco Systems
Tel: +1 408-527-8972   Mobile: +1 415-370-4628
E-mail: ole@cisco.com  URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj

On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Dave CROCKER wrote:

> 
> 
> On 2/24/2010 5:24 PM, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
> >    with only one meeting we don't have a lot of data that
> > tells us about use and abuse of this system,
> 
> 
> Ole,
> 
> Besides the statistic of the number of one day passes, how is the assessment
> being done of folks who wanted one more day pass, or who declined to attend,
> who would have done a regular fee if the one-day had not existed, or any of
> the myriad other tidbits that might aid in understanding the effects from this
> experiment?
> 
> d/
> -- 
> 
>   Dave Crocker
>   Brandenburg InternetWorking
>   bbiw.net
>