Re: imparting clues to the trade press
Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com> Fri, 27 August 1999 05:10 UTC
Received: by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) id BAA08519 for ietf-outbound.10@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 01:10:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postman.bayarea.net (postman.bayarea.net [205.219.84.13]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA07931 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 01:00:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from shell2.bayarea.net (shell2.bayarea.net [205.219.84.7]) by postman.bayarea.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA88004; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 21:59:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dcrocker@brandenburg.com)
Received: (from dcrocker@localhost) by shell2.bayarea.net (8.8.8/8.8.5) id VAA17066; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 21:59:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.19990826213716.00ae6950@shell2.bayarea.net>
X-Sender: dcrocker@shell2.bayarea.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 21:58:52 -0700
To: "John W. Noerenberg" <jwn2@qualcomm.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Subject: Re: imparting clues to the trade press
Cc: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>, aboba@internaut.com, 'Keith Moore' <moore@cs.utk.edu>, 'Gunnar Lindberg' <lindberg@CDG.CHALMERS.SE>, ietf@ietf.org, vjs@calcite.rhyolite.com
In-Reply-To: <v04210133b3eba554f107@[129.46.222.63]>
References: <199908270130.VAA16393@astro.cs.utk.edu> <199908270130.VAA16393@astro.cs.utk.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
At 08:08 PM 8/26/99 , John W. Noerenberg wrote: >AltaVista found 1463 web pages mentioning RFC822 since the beginning of this Hmm. The query I just made found 13,486 for "rfc822" and 8485 for "rfc 822"... For some others: "rfc 1123" = 1903 and "rfc1123" = 1078 "rfc 821" = 2879 and "rfc821" = 1077 "rfc 823" = 495340 and "rfc823" = 77 "rfc 824" = 528240 and "rfc824" = 33 And how many of you know what RFC 823 was about, without looking? Bob Hinden is disqualified, since he wrote it. >year. There were 4 references to STD11. This is the *same* >document! (Ok, I didn't count the reference to dance studio STD11 at >Danceworks.com...) References to *any* IETF BCP was listed on only 311 >pages. Keith, you are absolutely right, an RFC label is a powerful >instrument. Granting it to a But as the exercise above makes clear, the label of RFC is not sufficient to guarantee popularity. So, yes, there are some people who abuse the process and some who make exaggerated claims, but I believe there is very little evidence of long term benefit to them or detriment to the IETF. As to the press, well, some reporters are diligent and others (these days, most) are not. In spite of years of history with hype-of-the-moment, many continue to play up the latest simplistic, unlikely claim. We aren't going to fix that. It sells papers. >But work such as Dan's -- properly done -- or perhaps the hypothetical >paper described by Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim, deserves a place in the >pantheon of Absent effort to publish fraud or slander, the most we should do is require addition of explanatory material from the IESG which helps clarify context, concerns, and the like. d/ d/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dave Crocker Tel: +1 408 246 8253 Brandenburg Consulting Fax: +1 408 273 6464 675 Spruce Drive <http://www.brandenburg.com> Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument Scott Bradner
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument Scott Bradner
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument Vernon Schryver
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument Stephen Kent
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument Scott Bradner
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument John Stracke
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument Keith Moore
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument bmanning
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument Keith Moore
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument braden
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument Robert G. Ferrell
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument braden
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument Keith Moore
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument Charles Perkins
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument Richard Shockey
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument Stephen Kent
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument Lloyd Wood
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument Keith Moore
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument Vernon Schryver
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument John W. Noerenberg
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument Keith Moore
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument John W. Noerenberg
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument John W. Noerenberg
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument Keith Moore
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument Keith Moore
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument John W. Noerenberg
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument John W. Noerenberg
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument Keith Moore
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument Tripp Lilley
- RE: the old "separate document series" argument Spencer Dawkins
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument Tripp Lilley
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument Ole J. Jacobsen
- RE: the old "separate document series" argument mark.paton
- RE: the old "separate document series" argument Tripp Lilley
- RE: the old "separate document series" argument mark.paton
- RE: the old "separate document series" argument mark.paton
- RE: the old "separate document series" argument mark.paton
- RE: the old "separate document series" argument mark.paton
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument Gunnar Lindberg
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument Colin Perkins
- RE: the old "separate document series" argument Scott Bradner
- RE: the old "separate document series" argument Casati, Alessio (Alessio)
- imparting clues to the trade press Keith Moore
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument Charles Perkins
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument Keith Moore
- RE: imparting clues to the trade press Bernard Aboba
- Re: imparting clues to the trade press Keith Moore
- Re: imparting clues to the trade press John W. Noerenberg
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument John Stracke
- Re: imparting clues to the trade press John Stracke
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument John W. Noerenberg
- Re: the old "separate document series" argument Scott Bradner
- Normative vs. non-normative references Larry Masinter
- RE: imparting clues to the trade press John W. Noerenberg
- Re: imparting clues to the trade press Keith Moore
- Re: imparting clues to the trade press John W. Noerenberg
- Re: imparting clues to the trade press Dave Crocker
- RE: imparting clues to the trade press...and PR d… Richard Shockey
- Re: imparting clues to the trade press...and PR d… Keith Moore
- Re: imparting clues to the trade press...and PR d… Randy Bush