Re: Facilitators experiment

"Doug Ewell" <doug@ewellic.org> Mon, 13 June 2016 18:21 UTC

Return-Path: <doug@ewellic.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4339C12D906 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 11:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PDhBdGfiBJln for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 11:21:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plwbeout03-05.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtp03-05-2.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [72.167.218.217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EAE112D8F9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 11:21:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([72.167.218.135]) by p3plwbeout03-05.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with bizsmtp id 6JMU1t0012vs63s01JMUNi; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 11:21:28 -0700
X-SID: 6JMU1t0012vs63s01
Received: (qmail 31964 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2016 18:21:28 -0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-Originating-IP: 208.51.143.189
User-Agent: Workspace Webmail 6.3.4
Message-Id: <20160613112126.665a7a7059d7ee80bb4d670165c8327d.3ca5dcc2b3.wbe@email03.godaddy.com>
From: Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Facilitators experiment
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 11:21:26 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/tlSImYO_1DD2T-zfn-guVEpgG10>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 18:21:45 -0000

S Moonesamy wrote:

> The suggestion is to contact each person who starts a new topic of
> discussion without also changing the subject header [1] of the message
> and ask him/her to try and start a new topic of discussion in future
> by also changing the subject header.

Speaking as an IETF outsider (2 RFCs, acknowledged in some others, but
no meetings) who has nevertheless followed the Singapore thread, I think
this effort may be limited to the extent people are even aware they are
starting a new topic. Most of the topic changes in the thread were
gradual segues rather than abrupt shifts.

--
Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸