Re: DNSSEC

On 8/31/2010 7:36 AM, Glen Barney (AMS) wrote:
> Community - 
> 
> The DNS zone files have been re-signed, and we will look into alternatives to
> the original DNSSEC tools that were in use (which seem to be broken.)
> 
> And just a reminder that, while posting complaints to this list might feel
> more therapeutic, the secretariat has an address set up for trouble reports,
> which is ietf-action@ietf.org .  Sending complaints to that address will
> generally get much faster results.
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> Glen
> Glen Barney
> IT Director
> AMS (IETF Secretariat)

Glen your real issue is why DNSSEC was released in this condition and
the damage to the world in the form of wasted effort this causes.
Something that for what its worth provides yet another black-eye for the
IETF (and the parties making GSO and the IETF their career).

Todd Glassey
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 
> 
> 
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
> Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3103 - Release Date: 08/30/10 11:34:00
> 

-- 
//-----------------------------------------------------------------

This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based
on this message or any information herein. If you have received this
message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this message.

Thank you for your cooperation.