IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] GEN-Art LC review of draft-ietf-jose-cfrg-curves-05

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 18 August 2016 14:06 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C55812DF12; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 07:06:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.147
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.147 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZS9kTqqdl5wS; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 07:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3354612DF0E; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 07:06:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEAF52CCB3; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:06:16 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wM0SLDtQeNV2; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:06:16 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 079782CC9C; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:06:15 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] GEN-Art LC review of draft-ietf-jose-cfrg-curves-05
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D14E98F3-8918-451A-B66E-18650DD39A06"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <20160818132043.f27ok77hd6kosjln@LK-Perkele-V2.elisa-laajakaista.fi>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 16:06:16 +0200
Message-Id: <FAE41E35-243E-411F-A3BF-80CEEDA57DFD@piuha.net>
References: <010f01d1f1b5$22c31580$68494080$@gmail.com> <4A962815-7FDB-46FD-929B-41C23924391B@piuha.net> <20160818132043.f27ok77hd6kosjln@LK-Perkele-V2.elisa-laajakaista.fi>
To: Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/u30EBcwvT3eL3BjdXjhe7MAXBMY>
Cc: draft-ietf-jose-cfrg-curves.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 14:06:22 -0000

> Did the changes to Editor's Copy.

Great, thanks!

> My understanding (I am a newbie to writing IETF RFCs) is that in this
> stage of process, I should not submit updated version without being
> told to do that (IIRC, by shepherd, AD or datatracker state).

That is correct.

(But it often helps to email back to various commenters that you’ve seen their comments and plan to address them.)

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email