Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-conditional-ras-04
Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com> Mon, 21 May 2018 08:23 UTC
Return-Path: <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A1112E87B; Mon, 21 May 2018 01:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
To: ops-dir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-v6ops-conditional-ras.all@ietf.org, v6ops@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-conditional-ras-04
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.80.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152689102802.23045.6041887435563645658@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 01:23:48 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/u5xZPL2kmZ0FCf-2LT-Jh71VcE8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 08:23:48 -0000
Reviewer: Sheng Jiang Review result: Has Issues Reviewer: Sheng Jiang Review result: Has Issues I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This Informational document describes a mechanism that uses the conditional Router Advertisements for Enterprise Multihoming in which an enterprise network up-links to multiple ISPs using an address space assigned by an ISP. Major issue: no. Minor issue: There are many unused reference. However, they are not simple Nits and cannot be fixed by deleting them from reference list. Many of these unused reference are really relevant and should have some content to describe the relationship with the mechanism or scenario of the document, such as RFC6296 NAT66, etc. Regards, Sheng
- RE: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-c… Sheng Jiang
- Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-c… Jen Linkova
- Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-condi… Sheng Jiang
- Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-c… Jen Linkova