rfc1101 ?
Toerless Eckert <Toerless.Eckert@informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Mon, 31 January 1994 15:41 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05241; 31 Jan 94 10:41 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05226; 31 Jan 94 10:41 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04705; 31 Jan 94 10:41 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05178; 31 Jan 94 10:41 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04760; 31 Jan 94 10:35 EST
Received: from faui45.informatik.uni-erlangen.de by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04459; 31 Jan 94 10:35 EST
Received: from faui43.informatik.uni-erlangen.de by uni-erlangen.de with SMTP; id AA01750 (5.65c-6/7.3v-FAU); Mon, 31 Jan 1994 16:33:21 +0100
Received: from faui45r.informatik.uni-erlangen.de by immd4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de with SMTP; id AA27005 (5.65c-6/7.3m-FAU); Mon, 31 Jan 1994 16:33:20 +0100
Message-Id: <199401311533.AA27005@faui43.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Subject: rfc1101 ?
To: ietf@nri.reston.va.us
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 1994 16:32:51 +0100
X-Orig-Sender: ietf-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Toerless Eckert <Toerless.Eckert@informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Organisation: CSD IMMD IV, University of Erlangen, Germany
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 402
Hi What's the current state of RFC1101 ? Last time i looked at it, it was still a proposed extension. Is there anything succeding it, or are there any better ideas how to achieve the presented goal ? If not: Why has it never been promoted to proposed standard ? I for once would hope that SNM tools and the like could well profit from it if it would become more widespread. Regards Toerless Eckert
- rfc1101 ? Toerless Eckert