Re: Khaled Routing Protocol (KRP) ID Submission.

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Thu, 13 April 2017 01:22 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADEEB126C7B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:22:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2gSoLcjKMDRN for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C596B127909 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1cyTSp-0007Np-DB; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 01:22:23 +0000
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 10:22:21 +0900
Message-ID: <m2mvblyucy.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
Cc: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Khaled Routing Protocol (KRP) ID Submission.
In-Reply-To: <CDD5DCA6-4722-4C7A-92E3-501AA25C547A@cisco.com>
References: <D7707E4B-CD37-478A-B640-47148DE3276A@consulintel.es> <AM4PR0401MB2241689CED212EF6C7F2E66ABD030@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> <CDD5DCA6-4722-4C7A-92E3-501AA25C547A@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/24.5 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="BIG5"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/uLV1htX7mNSIXKqTEsKFWduFTpI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 01:22:28 -0000

> I took a quick look at your draft.  It seems to be proposing a way to
> assign IP addresses so that they contain information about regions and
> autonomous systems – and then suggesting that forwarding can be done
> based on that.  But you are not proposing a routing protocol (packet
> formats, protocol details, etc.)...

landmark routing, tla/nla, ...  we have seen ideas in this area none of
which flew.  i agree that this needs more specifics before we can really
judge.

khaled, if you need help dealing with the ietf's obscure methods for
naming, posting, ... drafts, feel free to write to me.

randy