IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Bringing back Internet transparency

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Fri, 02 August 2013 06:29 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA2A711E821E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 23:29:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.617
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.617 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.018, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hwr4HooYsFEV for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 23:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE7011E8253 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 23:28:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31B7320F30; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 02:28:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 02 Aug 2013 02:28:12 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to; s=smtpout; bh=sng7vRjFNN0ZUlpRGbbHmzmkZK0=; b=MM dtwsrEQdemf8ZZ+d46HqhJ/ttVywuXufSb96n81PYnTGYcH3ERve+O9J0z+Wqx0A YykmbhXfb5omonrcAje50IV3Wno+pt5RtLcZOaGOk0jtlvsQjAwPEksjNd9bxDo7 zqb8cQrw8Bn7zNz5brJ45DMequHkfNovin6JHGzV8=
X-Sasl-enc: 0Tbu9HaIp0602d9NRbyitd9CRtw5pDlkRCW1AiPcd5BT 1375424891
Received: from surfer-172-29-8-65-hotspot.internet-for-guests.com (unknown [87.193.195.90]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1F5F26800A0; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 02:28:10 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Bringing back Internet transparency
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130801191438.C027718C183@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 08:28:08 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A3C285AE-7B5C-4BAA-8FAC-F4BC209CE275@network-heretics.com>
References: <20130801191438.C027718C183@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
To: Noel Chiappa <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 06:29:21 -0000

On Aug 1, 2013, at 9:14 PM, Noel Chiappa wrote:

>> From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
> 
>> The ISPs had a clear interest in killing of NAT which threatened the
>> ISP business model.
> 
> So this is rather amusing: you're trying to tell me that ISPs wanted to kill
> NAT, and I have other people telling me NAT was an intergral part of ISPs'
> master plan to take over the universe.
> 
> Clearly you all both can't be right.

ISPs were against NATs at first.   It was only later that they embraced them.

Keith

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email