Re: A different approach to remote meetings / Mesh videos
Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> Sun, 13 October 2019 16:38 UTC
Return-Path: <scott.brim@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0EDB120129 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 09:38:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wB82dWLPpBqh for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 09:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x332.google.com (mail-ot1-x332.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::332]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EAF31200C3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 09:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x332.google.com with SMTP id s22so11910365otr.6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 09:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=47FR+Aya+v8aJ3TEtsDvVylFbYwMSHY0d15RXPAEeJU=; b=FU8/C4hE1lLrwqVpGeqHGcJVVYBFKJMLPEMHx3XjZR4iacDuLqJPxgJ8ohKEQdgEBW OFanAf4ASWKz4B5DeQ+toZz8dH1cbPUPfTLCOkpNabmCQylB8pqcXr+ibnGbB5MDaYwv 0eTLaYqEo6YrkBR7sExIPWWpfDfPEDlZlKLr/lozXYp2cxMND+ujyItigM2SUwvcudng +UzUkbdTDHTPcxFVW0SkkF6Y+B6wFxRx5uoz7TAfJyYKxQuEotyNfvg7/lIl6PolFR4P pmW451RBquShmk76UE8iJuoTCBz06wSeBcsF9uY0vKRZH3J754kb7yaxqiSsmOvOtFnn Jm4g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=47FR+Aya+v8aJ3TEtsDvVylFbYwMSHY0d15RXPAEeJU=; b=gl/d9eZ2j1jVtxZjUL1qPZIYz/WR0dNzhsRE+qpPSy5wXRZjtKVzEbVf2S3SpRwrAI S7gMfx4vELWLtjmWROHzJ4QyT0r9gt0twLl2pDknZqjMdTBpWVp1DfaHro8yHb4AGjE+ 8LkjuS0nF1Z58+WUSKO87sMwjbGEqjkAF64USbiXis8NABSXI5C0tmeqGK1U9vFVH9xg BfNAlbYp+IVznX8xwVjZJQiTXAemWMW9HVN1ZluvQB6D+CpakVVX8JhrEYYlQJ2ClqaS H/c55QL4MyCh5oKwNfiUbtMxQ9BeBwlVEpw7PJKEvzR6BdHfIcVvidEllmWYx4SHENR4 PdMA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX+NTLmDZ9/+n5XOufj5zjGCZkoYPRpRc46Bj//rbaqKzNfIn3h vlUEqqsAqoTgyGqo0/OCSibrZgsWJdjD4ulh4zyTzSI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxlcMfG9bK20K+WeiC1PvTQ+maIaeU0ipKd0rN8OkqNKknikbvO5ZxxFwtlnnF7cDyOyIYkzpCPlK3v7ruDLmw=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6ac6:: with SMTP id m6mr21131160otq.123.1570984712309; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 09:38:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMm+LwjokhxkJXdPczfHQVWqMG1x528yXZ=vvu4yq1W3R9T=YQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwjokhxkJXdPczfHQVWqMG1x528yXZ=vvu4yq1W3R9T=YQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 12:38:15 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPv4CP9XVM72C7ZemAUQbBTwBAGch3HGorgBaO2jKptyj8CvWw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: A different approach to remote meetings / Mesh videos
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b990820594cd6149"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/uYA8fV806fxLOYqKlmBFQDXnFmQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 16:38:46 -0000
There's a reason why "flipped classroom" teaching strategies have taken off. They allow better use of face-to-face time. Once upon a time in IntArea WG we set a policy that nothing should be brought to the physical meeting unless it had been discussed on the list and we were clear on the issues that needed f2f discussion. It didn't last long. People like to talk in person. >
- A different approach to remote meetings / Mesh vi… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: A different approach to remote meetings / Mes… Yoav Nir
- Re: A different approach to remote meetings / Mes… Scott Brim
- Re: A different approach to remote meetings / Mes… Phillip Hallam-Baker