IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-14.txt> (IANA Reserved IPv4 Prefix for Shared Address Space) to BCP'

Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann@gmail.com> Thu, 16 February 2012 15:55 UTC

Return-Path: <cgrundemann@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1986F21F8715 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 07:55:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.513
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.513 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.214, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WYXcIdT0XLws for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 07:55:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE8E21F864D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 07:55:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by dakl33 with SMTP id l33so2302733dak.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 07:55:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/f0LVzVu7Sytiuu2jBqwKBG2GKmOzkvHZP7kTnxDQ1c=; b=D5YmqTinZrbhkJUN7QlPSxBFg34rYMzQMtftQPIW4K/d2Ed9/ZOfCQQrp0gQhvv1Vh D6zU8OSfL/ngVTCSDGGXVfFH5UVv4S0HE6Pu+9oAcXLh9ZYT+10dpdY6qQ91nZoRBekh yhTk7icbQJ017ax5D9Zu8Xt59mFinKS+X2guA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.216.195 with SMTP id os3mr9363406pbc.137.1329407725573; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 07:55:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.60.200 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 07:55:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAKFn1SGxzvNh_n09CaY5+Ke+s7Uq8nvX9H-TgN7QykouQ+nQUA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8F9F107F1A51524597A5D2E0F43EE9632AD416BD28@PRVPEXVS09.corp.twcable.com> <CAKFn1SGxzvNh_n09CaY5+Ke+s7Uq8nvX9H-TgN7QykouQ+nQUA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:55:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CAC1-dtmpsWRZQ_QwO6CpdKGYo5++KWZU+mGxkB=cjYfPMd2okw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-14.txt> (IANA Reserved IPv4 Prefix for Shared Address Space) to BCP'
From: Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann@gmail.com>
To: Roger Jørgensen <rogerj@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 15:55:38 -0000

On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 02:34, Roger Jørgensen <rogerj@gmail.com> wrote:
> not replying specific to this mail but to the tons that have arrived
> lately, are there some confusion out there that it is the amount of
> "votes" on ietf@ that make a do/do not on a draft? ... or just me
> missunderstanding this?

It is my understanding that the IETF operates in an open, bottom-up,
consensus-based manor and thus that all voices, taken in context, are
important in all decisions made.

> anyway, great to see people participate :-)

It is indeed.
~Chris


> --- Roger J ---
>
> Roger Jorgensen           |
> rogerj@gmail.com          | - IPv6 is The Key!
> http://www.jorgensen.no   | roger@jorgensen.no
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf



-- 
@ChrisGrundemann
http://chrisgrundemann.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email