IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting-08.txt> (SPF Authentication Failure Reporting using the Abuse Report Format) to Proposed Standard

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Fri, 02 March 2012 18:43 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3150221E803C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 10:43:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.604
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.604 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.005, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 85OKsh635U2S for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 10:43:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4197721E8049 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 10:43:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EXCH-MBX901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::addf:849a:f71c:4a82]) by EXCH-HTCAS901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::2966:6846:8d89:4681%12]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 10:43:33 -0800
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting-08.txt> (SPF Authentication Failure Reporting using the Abuse Report Format) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Topic: Last Call: <draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting-08.txt> (SPF Authentication Failure Reporting using the Abuse Report Format) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Index: AQHM+IhjGfsh27xNzEaq9uOELx7h+ZZXVOtg
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 18:43:32 +0000
Message-ID: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392807309D@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <20120301004643.17274.83943.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <1637246.LVMrVQYPHS@scott-latitude-e6320> <CAC4RtVCSNcdiwcYR5fMcPvMSxCAVFNrWg+7-AOyM4G22u7vu9Q@mail.gmail.com> <1349422.baAQMnczus@scott-latitude-e6320>
In-Reply-To: <1349422.baAQMnczus@scott-latitude-e6320>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.20.2.121]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 18:43:50 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Scott Kitterman
> Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 7:23 AM
> To: ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting-08.txt> (SPF
> Authentication Failure Reporting using the Abuse Report Format) to
> Proposed Standard
> 
> Based on that, I think that the sentence in paragraph 6 could be lost
> without losing anything important, so I think it should stay as it is.

Yes, I suggest that the sentence that comprises Section 6 proper can be dropped.  The text currently in 6.1 can be moved up to 6, and the current 6.1 thus removed.

> It might be worth someone looking at draft-ietf-marf-authfailure-report-10
> again to see if that's really appropriate.

I'll take a second look.

-MSK, MARF co-chair

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email