IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Privacy (RE: Should IETF do more to fight computer crime?)

Harald Alvestrand <Harald@Alvestrand.no> Thu, 25 May 2000 08:40 UTC

Received: by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) id EAA01985 for ietf-outbound.10@ietf.org; Thu, 25 May 2000 04:40:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from dokka.maxware.no (dokka.maxware.no [195.139.236.69]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA01870 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 May 2000 04:30:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from langfjella.maxware.no ([193.44.76.100]) by dokka.maxware.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA20692; Thu, 25 May 2000 10:29:56 +0200
Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20000524154123.0402adf0@127.0.0.1>
X-Sender: hta@127.0.0.1
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 15:45:28 +0200
To: "Dawson, Peter D" <Dawson.Peter@emeryworld.com>, 'IETF general mailing list' <ietf@ietf.org>
From: Harald Alvestrand <Harald@Alvestrand.no>
Subject: RE: Privacy (RE: Should IETF do more to fight computer crime?)
In-Reply-To: <C7091526C06AD211A7450004AC384A350C35D20A@mwabs035.emerywor ld.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Loop: ietf@ietf.org

At 12:40 24.05.2000 +0000, Dawson, Peter D wrote:
>So the "unverified accusation" ... should become "verifiable" and this
>could only be possible if there is a code of ethics between noc/isp etc...
>i.e just what I suggested in my earlier posting...
RFC 2350 and draft-ietf-grip-isp-expectations, and other GRIP documents are 
the furthest the IETF has come in addressing the "code of ethics" problem.

It's a start; we've proved that getting anywhere in this direction causes a 
great deal of discussion, and that expectations vary greatly.

The group is still open, and welcomes volunteers.

                   Harald

--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, EDB Maxware, Norway
Harald.Alvestrand@edb.maxware.no

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email