Re: Tropical/resort meetings in germany

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Fri, 28 November 2014 01:26 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4523B1A0270 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:26:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ilm-bAykW_u0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:26:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com [209.85.212.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 088C41A038A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:26:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id bs8so19656725wib.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:26:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=sNqPJayVKIHT49s3Go/aZlwSqAksMnfE8I1AO/lH2BU=; b=axiCktqmXRm/ukeBqowaFHMzkyOIUozTtEgIUcTt1/aKPBlOLXaBGt/HYmOqBF9fbi SO/37Cv7hBmTv2MQttuoAmkdKZrvwO0HQUNBAS9C3qZyLP0Y+GqyaT29OVsTPjyKdjno xyHbqnNWkjiZwqFLM83yIFRv+Sazigug/FXdv3BYQ0h0IWiUaYKGUCCQLcaDsgS/AN5J 4224MQsJL/IVLHgLkDb7BKzJPxgRE7JnthBspqZVfi5Vk7juqg07hrTZPDi88hrWKoVZ u6zIyKWGRdkU48/PRAhKBva4p20H08mxJY6lvHrKnfo+29RAazthSRvIN6ka8Rfn0o9V y8iw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl/iOe5Ow2P3dYT+DSBGOyePCWAcvilgCrlCISZxmaNJbymVmbwc7agd10VvWzjOnLvowcT
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.91.36 with SMTP id cb4mr46356746wib.30.1417138010492; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:26:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.64.37 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:26:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <6B0461EF5BCE2362C986A9EC@192.168.1.128>
References: <CA+XWq4FU=D_nQgSh6hG2wbUM0wv7WHqsPASrAjKVUXB-2vaJcA@mail.gmail.com> <20141126145604.GA25552@nic.fr> <CAL9jLaZC4C-=3=5TUs9+Cs+YnWNG_EKVbYSGoHKuD44P+U4okw@mail.gmail.com> <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD23399675B4@XMB122CNC.rim.net> <547774D3.4060102@krsek.cz> <20141127194735.5955730.47911.2396@blackberry.com> <CAHw9_i+Vt2i5E0BU=mZib4HVtuc0sg6XTiSya5D5PFSZu-xt=A@mail.gmail.com> <6B0461EF5BCE2362C986A9EC@192.168.1.128>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 20:26:50 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iKPwOwSAzf2O-HrPH71AiomoWGo9c7Cg_GQpCpcbq17Bw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Tropical/resort meetings in germany
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d043d6711b6a7de0508e12718"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/wTBg3JWA7F-esxxt2hpT5_bCU2U
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 01:26:54 -0000

On Thursday, November 27, 2014, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:

>
>
> --On Thursday, 27 November, 2014 15:07 -0500 Warren Kumari
> <warren@kumari.net <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> >...
> > What may be feasible would be to host in a ship that remains
> > in port, tied to the dock. Connectivity, travel, etc all get
> > better, and some liners have issues filling all year round...
> >...
>
> I would encourage anyone whose IETF work is supported by a
> US-based company and who is taking this seriously to check with
> your organizational legal and accounting departments about the
> special rules that apply to meetings on cruise ships.  After
> they get through explaining to you how much they are enchanted
> with the idea, you might summarize their reactions to the rest
> of us.
>
> Those subject to the taxation rules of other countries may or
> may not discover that similar rules apply to them.
>
> On the other hand, if the purpose of this discussion is to waste
> the time of everyone on this list,



I believe that that is at least 98% of the purpose, yes.


> my apologies for interrupting
> your entertainment.



Apology accepted,
W

>
>    john
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in
the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of
pants.
   ---maf