IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Clarification of my comment on giving up on process issues

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Sun, 16 April 2006 20:29 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FVDrk-0006PT-VU; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 16:29:04 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FVDrj-0006PO-Rb for ietf@ietf.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 16:29:03 -0400
Received: from mf36636d0.tmodns.net ([208.54.102.243] helo=carter-zimmerman.mit.edu) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FVDrh-0006Dl-JN for ietf@ietf.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 16:29:03 -0400
Received: by carter-zimmerman.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 74FF8E0053; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 16:28:45 -0400 (EDT)
To: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
References: <tsl4q1qgw1c.fsf@cz.mit.edu> <1E3DAA22946EAF9B94AA3B1D@p3.JCK.COM> <444101F3.3A52@xyzzy.claranet.de>
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 16:28:45 -0400
In-Reply-To: <444101F3.3A52@xyzzy.claranet.de> (Frank Ellermann's message of "Sat, 15 Apr 2006 16:23:47 +0200")
Message-ID: <tsl3bgd6z9e.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Clarification of my comment on giving up on process issues
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

>>>>> "Frank" == Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> writes:

    Frank> IMHO Sam's proposal was meant to help Randy and Harald (as
    Frank> the list-moms of two affected lists), and the IESG with a
    Frank> certain "situation" (RfC 3934 not good enough, 3683 too
    Frank> disruptive) - as it turned out the IESG didn't need this
    Frank> and went with 3683.

My proposal was meant to give the community some room to hash out the
mailing list issue and to try and encourage more positive discussion.
I've been swamped by day job issues and by some technical work within
the IESG and have not gotten back to it.  I will try and get the
necessary consensus.  I do strongly support my proposal and/or
something more targeted at a BCP.  I'm quite sure I'd resign rather
than go through another non-trivial PR-action under the current
procedures.

--Sam


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email