Re: DRAFT-IETF-GEOPRIV-RADIUS-LO-23
todd glassey <tglassey@certichron.com> Wed, 25 September 2013 13:23 UTC
Return-Path: <tglassey@certichron.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D62D11E810F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 06:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QxqVnAVmRXhB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 06:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plsmtpa09-08.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa09-08.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [173.201.193.237]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC0D21F9FB6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 06:23:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.110] ([67.180.133.21]) by p3plsmtpa09-08.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with id VRPh1m00H0Trh6B01RPiJg; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 06:23:42 -0700
Message-ID: <5242E3DD.3080404@certichron.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 06:23:41 -0700
From: todd glassey <tglassey@certichron.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: DRAFT-IETF-GEOPRIV-RADIUS-LO-23
References: <180B3E3BF11C4B4581E20A837620FAF0177003C5E4@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <180B3E3BF11C4B4581E20A837620FAF0177003C5E4@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090605030803050500070406"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 08:33:51 -0700
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 13:23:52 -0000
On 04/08/2009 12:12 PM, Anthony Leibovitz wrote: > > > As an example, Section 1 states that "location information needs to > be protected against unauthorized access and distribution", yet > nowhere in the document are the implications of this statement for > the RADIUS protocol laid out. D > Anthony - so what - this is the IETF and there is nothing here mandating that any protocol work with another. If GeoPriv breaks RADIUS that is grounds for more standards work right ??? Nice... Todd Glassey -- Warning: This message contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the intended recipient), you may not read, use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachment(s) thereto without retaining any copies.
- DRAFT-IETF-GEOPRIV-RADIUS-LO-23 Anthony Leibovitz
- RE: DRAFT-IETF-GEOPRIV-RADIUS-LO-23 Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: DRAFT-IETF-GEOPRIV-RADIUS-LO-23 todd glassey