Re: exploring the process of self retiring one's name from an RFC

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Fri, 19 April 2019 11:28 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320451201AB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 04:28:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.632
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.632 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i_u7y_4Vv0Hy for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 04:28:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 699DC120133 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 04:28:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x3JBSNRI029824 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 13:28:23 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id D1426206201 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 13:28:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C765B2030DD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 13:28:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x3JBSNIo027958 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 13:28:23 +0200
Subject: Re: exploring the process of self retiring one's name from an RFC
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <1a0ba1ad-9e32-4663-208c-f94f4f0306de@gmail.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <00fde7c6-c8a4-508e-5735-056647cdfb52@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 13:28:23 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1a0ba1ad-9e32-4663-208c-f94f4f0306de@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/wnYJRsaIRTmN7wcCUpQQmdJ3FTs>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 11:28:27 -0000

Hi Scott,

Thank you for the reply.

> Re: exploring the process of self retiring one's name from an RFC
> 
> "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com> Fri, 19 April 2019 10:14 UTCShow
> header
> 
> RFCs are not changed after they are published so removing one’s name
> from a existing RFC cannot be done.

Errata?

Alex

> 
> Scott
> 
>> On Apr 19, 2019, at 6:00 AM, Alexandre Petrescu
>> <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>; wrote:
>> 
>> Hi IETFers,
>> 
>> I would like to ask whether there is process steps to retire one's
>> name from a published RFC.
>> 
>> I consider using such process to retire my name from the RFC that 
>> analyses the 64bit boundary analysis.
>> 
>> For some reason I got in that group, then participated positively
>> to the discussion, and I let myself tempted to have my name up on
>> the first page of a published RFC; but finally, after much time and
>> reflexion, I think I do not agree with the effects of this RFC.
>> 
>> (I know there is common practice to retire one's name from a Work
>> in Progress Internet Draft - suffices it to ask - but I dont know
>> whether the same can be done with a published RFC).
>> 
>> Alex
>> 
>