Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-dscp-registry-05

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Thu, 17 May 2018 14:49 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B60FE127775; Thu, 17 May 2018 07:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
To: <secdir@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-dscp-registry.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, tsvwg@ietf.org
Subject: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-dscp-registry-05
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.80.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152656859955.7651.10624051963160660895@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 07:49:59 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/wrP0OV84KBymsFMMd420agLtmEU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 14:50:00 -0000

Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready

Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

Summary: Ready for publication as Standards Track RFC

This document is entirely about changing the IANA registration policies
for part (pool 3) of the DSCP value registry. It is clearly written, and the
instructions to IANA are detailed. The security considerations section
appropriately notes that the document does not introduce new security
considerations for the Internet.