Re: [Lime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-11.txt> (Generic YANG Data Model for Connectionless Operations, Administration, and Maintenance(OAM) protocols) to Proposed Standard

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Thu, 19 October 2017 16:01 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B4C31321BB; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:01:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m9QjDa7xEPGi; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D45D41330AE; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=11050; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1508428900; x=1509638500; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=c3HOtBPDmHVMPA9ofh7/QANiPOz3Y+AiYUVLjpvA2s0=; b=Aiz17Uh4fK4kud5M1LoayqRlzquaA+bscGm+9Nyhx5/ZVlT7+tndOVO3 3NkRBt+RSIpjTl6TtFQFq/3ZTxSyAM/KUbgOZxs00Q9z0cQf1FCPM9QIo SqOpnTlPGgpDVUplWWu2OUDXM44v/kndexYQ6p8dWtwYhZkYtpEmz3rwj I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0C0AADZy+hZ/5FdJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgm9wZG4nB4Nzih+PPopDiCuFPxCCBAoYAQyFFgIahHE/GAECAQEBAQEBAWsohR4CBAEBIUsLEAIBCDsEAwICAh8GCxQRAgQOBYk8TAMVEKsIgieHOw2DWQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARgFgy+CB4FRgWorgwOCXoFvg0wvgjIFoRc8AodfiBWEeYIUhXaLD40GiEECERkBgTgBHziBW3oVSS0BgiYBD4IjboFOdolVgREBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.43,402,1503360000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="91875250"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Oct 2017 16:01:39 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-008.cisco.com (xch-rtp-008.cisco.com [64.101.220.148]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v9JG1d8n012256 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 19 Oct 2017 16:01:39 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) by XCH-RTP-008.cisco.com (64.101.220.148) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 12:01:38 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 12:01:38 -0400
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
CC: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam@ietf.org>, "Ronald P. Bonica" <rbonica@juniper.net>, "lime-chairs@ietf.org" <lime-chairs@ietf.org>, "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>, "lime@ietf.org" <lime@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Lime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-11.txt> (Generic YANG Data Model for Connectionless Operations, Administration, and Maintenance(OAM) protocols) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Topic: [Lime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-11.txt> (Generic YANG Data Model for Connectionless Operations, Administration, and Maintenance(OAM) protocols) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Index: AQHTQpaR7crx2zDS7kC2rAOW6lNAlKLrJSkAgAB/xIA=
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 16:01:38 +0000
Message-ID: <B3116111-2D73-44AD-ABE1-5BE7A146C554@cisco.com>
References: <150772925005.24695.3851410645764765123.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+RyBmVq9MnC97LuVRzhYiR+_dj0gQ2YRSp+b-223fjQXvhR_w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmVq9MnC97LuVRzhYiR+_dj0gQ2YRSp+b-223fjQXvhR_w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.118.116.134]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B31161112D7344ADABE15BE7A146C554ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/x3qEKEbj0a7DVNc-csq-YnxW9FQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 16:01:43 -0000

Dear Greg,

The LIME WG and draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam editors have been considering all your comments, and will continue to do so.

For clarity, however, what are you referring to on this one-liner?

—
Carlos Pignataro, carlos@cisco.com<mailto:carlos@cisco.com>

“Sometimes I use big words that I do not fully understand, to make myself sound more photosynthesis."

On Oct 19, 2017, at 4:24 AM, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com<mailto:gregimirsky@gmail.com>> wrote:

Dear All,
please kindly consider my comments on draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 6:40 AM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org<mailto:iesg-secretary@ietf.org>> wrote:

The IESG has received a request from the Layer Independent OAM Management in
the Multi-Layer Environment WG (lime) to consider the following document: -
'Generic YANG Data Model for Connectionless Operations, Administration,
   and Maintenance(OAM) protocols'
  <draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-11.txt> as Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@ietf.org<mailto:ietf@ietf.org> mailing lists by 2017-10-25. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@ietf.org<mailto:iesg@ietf.org> instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of
the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


   This document presents a base YANG Data model for connectionless
   Operations Administration, and Maintenance(OAM) protocols.  It
   provides a technology-independent abstraction of key OAM constructs
   for connectionless protocols.  The base model presented here can be
   extended to include technology specific details.  This is leading to
   uniformity between OAM protocols and support both nested OAM
   workflows (i.e., performing OAM functions at different or same levels
   through a unified interface) and interacting OAM workflows ( i.e.,
   performing OAM functions at same levels through a unified interface).




The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam/ballot/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.




_______________________________________________
Lime mailing list
Lime@ietf.org<mailto:Lime@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime