draft-carpenter-newtrk-questions
Douglas Otis <dotis@mail-abuse.org> Sat, 10 June 2006 13:27 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fp3Ub-0003zR-6h; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 09:27:09 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fp3UZ-0003zJ-KH for ietf@ietf.org; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 09:27:07 -0400
Received: from a.mail.sonic.net ([64.142.16.245]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fp3UY-0005IC-6R for ietf@ietf.org; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 09:27:07 -0400
Received: from [192.168.2.11] (64-142-13-68.dsl.static.sonic.net [64.142.13.68]) (authenticated bits=0) by a.mail.sonic.net (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k5ADR4Ab001839 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 10 Jun 2006 06:27:05 -0700
From: Douglas Otis <dotis@mail-abuse.org>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <448A7209.7080700@zurich.ibm.com>
References: <448A7209.7080700@zurich.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 06:27:01 -0700
Message-Id: <1149946022.18610.66.camel@bash.adsl-64-142-13-68>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-4.fc4)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: draft-carpenter-newtrk-questions
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 09:17 +0200, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-carpenter-newtrk-questions-00.txt ,--- |The three possible ways forward are: | | 1. Agree that, apart from day to day efforts to improve efficiency, | the problems with the existing standards track are not serious | enough to justify the effort needed to make substantial changes. | Conclude that [RFC3774] exagerrated the problem and we only need | to make a relatively minor set of clarifications to BCP 9 | [RFC2026]. | 2. Focus on the issue of document relationships, or as the newtrk | charter currently says "the creation of a new series of short | IESG-approved IETF documents to describe and define IETF | technology standards." | 3. Focus on the three-stage standards track, or as the newtrk | charter currently says "agree on a revised IETF Standards | Track... to replace the standards track described in RFC 2026." '--- Step 2 should be the first step taken to achieve a description of the relationships in a simple, easy to maintain fashion. The <name.serial> provides clarity by offering a name rather than a number that is easier to remember, and secondly a sequential number to allow a prediction of the identifier for the next document when it finally emerges. The relationships, friendly name, and a clear sequence is missing within the current structure. Once the existence of a relational document is instantiated, then Step 3 may seek to flatten the RFC documents by imposing a structure of similar design to that of Step 2 indicating the level of the <name.serial> documents and indirectly elevating or lowering the related documents. Once Step 2 and then Step 3 are taken, the person isolated on some remote island only afforded IETF documents should have little trouble understanding what should be used to fulfill their goals. -Doug _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-newtrk-questions… Brian E Carpenter
- draft-carpenter-newtrk-questions Douglas Otis
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-newtrk-quest… Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-newtrk-quest… Keith Moore
- Re: draft-carpenter-newtrk-questions Douglas Otis