Re: WG Review: Web-Based Push Notifications (webpush)
Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Wed, 24 September 2014 18:00 UTC
Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38CBB1A01AE; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:00:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7uwAp6BISdC5; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:00:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1195F1A00DA; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:00:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (142-254-17-87.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.17.87]) (authenticated bits=0) by proper.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s8OI0ILO056713 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:00:21 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: proper.com: Host 142-254-17-87.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.17.87] claimed to be [10.20.30.90]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: WG Review: Web-Based Push Notifications (webpush)
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140924131919.8882.85143.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 10:59:21 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2BB9960F-9AD5-4BE4-9BDE-7BEAA443EA23@vpnc.org>
References: <20140924131919.8882.85143.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/xEBheA5FYUCy2D5xkDfmB-lhM3Q
Cc: webpush WG <webpush@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 18:00:23 -0000
Is this meant to be over HTTP or not? That WG is called "Web-based", and the charter says that this will be done in collaboration with with the W3C WG, but the charter also says that the WG will "develop a protocol". HTTP is already developed; in fact, we are close to finishing it again. :-) The charter should say "develop a way to use HTTP", not "develop a protocol". --Paul Hoffman
- Re: WG Review: Web-Based Push Notifications (webp… Paul Hoffman