IAB exchanges with ISO's SC6
Lyman Chapin <Lyman@bbn.com> Tue, 16 February 1993 16:21 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04849; 16 Feb 93 11:21 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04845; 16 Feb 93 11:21 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14465; 16 Feb 93 11:21 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04836; 16 Feb 93 11:21 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04829; 16 Feb 93 11:21 EST
Received: from BBN.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14458; 16 Feb 93 11:21 EST
Received: by BBN.COM id aa16421; 16 Feb 93 11:20 EST
X-Orig-Sender: ietf-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Lyman Chapin <Lyman@bbn.com>
Subject: IAB exchanges with ISO's SC6
To: ietf@nri.reston.va.us
Cc: lyman@bbn.com
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1993 10:56:37 -0400
Mail-System-Version: <BBN/MacEMail_v1.5@BBN.COM>
Message-ID: <9302161121.aa14458@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
The ISO working groups that deal with lower-layer standards met in London last week. Yesterday Ran Atkinson forwarded a note from Tony Whyman (who was a member of the UK delegation to the working group that deals with Network layer issues, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6/WG2) which comments on SC6's desire for "collaboration with the Internet community" in the development of "future network technologies", with a heavy emphasis on the IETF's TUBA work on running CLNP in the Internet. Tony's observations followed WG2's discussion on Thursday of how to interact with the Internet community - in particular, how to promote the use of CLNP and its associated routing protocols in the Internet. (WG2 held a similar discussion last summer at the SC6 meeting in San Diego, which resulted in a liaison contribution from SC6 to the IAB that said - in many more words than this! - that SC6 was eager to make whatever changes to CLNP might be necessary to facilitate its use in the Internet.) Tony's note captures, in some detail, the perspective of the SC6 community, which is (not surprisingly) heavily weighted in favor of ISO standards such as CLNP. I made an effort last week to direct the energies of the SC6 parti- cipants away from "promotion" of CLNP (explaining, for example, that liaison contributions "strongly supporting the use of CLNP in the Internet", with no technical substance, were not likely to impress anyone in the Internet world) and towards participation in the IETF. Most of the people at the London meeting had no idea how to go about using electronic mail to participate in IETF WGs (although most of them do have e-mail and, in many cases, FTP/Telnet access to the Internet). I spent about an hour describing how to join and contribute to WG mailing lists (with special emphasis on the importance of the "-request" convention...) and how to find things in anonymous ftp archives, and specifically directed people interested in the "next generation IP" discussions to the "sip", "tuba", "pip", "criteria", and "big-internet" lists. (Apologies to Nimrod and Ullman's IPv7, and any other work I neglected to mention - I put on the whiteboard only the e-mail addresses, RFC numbers, and internet draft names that I was sure were accurate. I'm expected to follow up with a distribution to SC6 of a package of "explaining the Internet and the IETF" material, so let me know if you feel strongly about something that should be included.) One result of this discussion was recognition of the importance of pursuing "collaboration" or "liaison" not by means of formal "we'd really like you to do X" letters to the IAB (or any other Internet body), but by (a) participation in the technical work, and (b) much better communication between the "ISO world" and the "Internet world". The SC6 chairman has been instructed to ask ISO to specifically release a list of about 25 Transport and Network layer ISO standards for on- line distribution at no charge and with no copyright restrictions, and it is virtually certain that ISO will agree. Included below are the IAB's contribution to the London meeting, and the SC6 response (which enables me to publish the final draft text of the new second edition of ISO/IEC 8473-1 (CLNP) as an RFC). I'd be glad to hear from anyone who has comments on the way in which the IAB has been dealing with ISO. The IAB's objective is to promote better communication and awareness across the cultural and technical gulf that separates the ISO/CCITT and Internet communities, not because we think that the future of the Internet depends on everyone being part of "one happy family", but because good technical work has resulted from collaboration in those areas - such as internetwork routing - in which there have been relatively few communication and participation barriers. I'd like to know whether or not IETFers agree with this objective. - Lyman ATTACHMENTS 1. Liaison contribution from SC6 to the IAB, 1992-07-21: ***************************************************************************** Title: Liaison Contribution to the Internet Architecture Board (IAB) Concerning Future Work on ISO/IEC 8473 (CLNP) and Network Layer Addressing Source: ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 (Telecommunications and Information Exchange Between Systems) Project(s): JTC1.06.32.04 and JTC1.06.32.01.02 Attachment(s): ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 6/N 7749, "Protocol for Providing the Connectionless-mode Network Service" (ISO/IEC 8473-1992, second edition) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 6/N 7558, "Network Service Definition" (ISO/IEC 8348-1992, second edition) During its meeting in San Diego on 13-24 July 1992, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 6 received and reviewed a report of current activities within the purview of the Internet Architecture Board (IAB) and its Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) concerning the way in which the OSI standard internetwork protocol (ISO/IEC 8473, also referred to as "CLNP") and the corresponding OSI standard Network layer addressing scheme (ISO/IEC 8348 Addendum 2, also referred to as "NSAPs") might be used within the Internet. Recognizing the importance of the Internet to its National Body constituents, and therefore the importance of the IAB and IETF activities with respect to these OSI standards, and considering the desire and intention of JTC1 to establish an effective liaison relationship with the Internet Society through the IAB, SC6 wishes to convey the following information to the IAB, and would welcome suggestions from the IAB of areas in which it believes that active liaison with SC6 would be beneficial. 1. SC6 is aware of and interested in the IAB's work on routing and addressing in the Internet, and on the incorporation of ISO/IEC 8473 (CLNP) into the Internet as part of a multiprotocol Internet architecture. 2. SC6 is also aware of the possibility that the opportunity might arise, during the course of this work, for SC6 to take actions that would facilitate it. 3. SC6 would, in such a circumstance, be prepared to work constructively with the IAB, in a timely fashion, to facilitate its work, and in particular is willing to seriously consider any proposal from the IAB for additions or amendments to the relevant ISO/IEC standards that might be required to permit the effective application of those standards in the Internet environment. ***************************************************************************** 2. Liaison contribution from the IAB back to SC6, 1993-02-01: To: ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 (Data Communications) From: Internet Architecture Board Date: 1 February, 1993 Re: SC6/N7584, Liaison contribution to the Internet Architecture Board (IAB) concerning future work on ISO/IEC 8473 and Network layer addressing The Internet Architecture Board (IAB) was pleased to receive the liaison contribution contained in SC6/N7584, and has circulated the contribution and its attachment (SC6/N7749) to the members of the Internet standards community. The group most directly involved with the application of CLNP (ISO/IEC 8473) in the Internet is the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Working Group "TUBA" ("TCP/UDP over CLNP-addressed Networks"), which has published a draft specification of the way in which CLNP can be used to perform the internetwork protocol functions of the Network layer in the context of the traditional TCP/IP protocol suite (as a direct replacement for the current Internet Protocol (IP)). The charter of the TUBA working group, and the draft specification "Use of ISO CLNP in TUBA Environments", are included as attachments to this liaison contribution. The Internet Architecture Board recognizes and appreciates the willingness of ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 to consider recommendations from the IAB for enhancements to the CLNP standard that would facilitate its application in the Internet, and expects that the results of the TUBA working groups analysis of the way in which CLNP behaves in actual deployment within the Internet will be received as a useful contribution to the work of ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 on the CLNP standard. Lyman Chapin IAB Chairman Attachments: (1) TUBA working group charter. (2) "Use of ISO CLNP in TUBA Environments" (an Internet Draft, <draft-ietf-tuba-clnp-02.txt>). ***************************************************************************** 3. Liaison contribution from SC6 to the IAB, 1993-02-12: 1993-02-12 ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION EXCHANGE BETWEEN SYSTEMS Secretariat: U.S.A. (ANSI) Title: Liaison Contribution to the Internet Architecture Board (IAB) Concerning Future Work on ISO/IEC 8473 Source: SC6 Project(s): JTC 1.06.32.04 Status: Requested Action: Attachment(s): ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 6/N 7964, "Protocol for Providing the Connectionless-mode Network Service", Part 1: Protocol Specification (ISO/IEC 8473-1, second edition) Distribution: The revised second edition text for ISO/IEC 8473-1, which has been forwarded to ITTF for ballot and to CCITT SG VII for consideration as the basis for an identical CCITT Recommendation (X.233), is attached for your information, in the context of your work on the application of the Connectionless Network Layer Protocol (CLNP) in the Internet. *****************************************************************************
- IAB exchanges with ISO's SC6 Lyman Chapin
- Re: IAB exchanges with ISO's SC6 Dave Crocker
- Re: IAB exchanges with ISO's SC6 Dave Crocker
- Re: IAB exchanges with ISO's SC6 Eric Fleischman