IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: How to get feedback on published RFCs

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 20 July 2016 09:52 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C32AA12DA1E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 02:52:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.077
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.077 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=wMN9laBj; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=Smq9ryh7
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6MLGZkvSgli1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 02:52:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0469412DB1E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 02:51:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.225.23.170]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u6K9pW5J001395 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 20 Jul 2016 02:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1469008304; x=1469094704; bh=iSPhUcswBdMmFritOB8hVX/aMNAy26xcB9nf7aZ2kIQ=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=wMN9laBj+dNl+FlFoHfPHA1kpAiPkYjGzEUtm99dLnt30ByMp7O7fn4Z/UNrwCwU7 AYt0riGmj/8V5GNxe9VZ6q2YTKdG6ntsS4izrI/wAyIh3eVkCKXA6dTI+ZmJAxG6Tr zMW331E5Xkxv5LQyEbsOWYgpYaXUM2No6LTDuXuE=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1469008304; x=1469094704; i=@elandsys.com; bh=iSPhUcswBdMmFritOB8hVX/aMNAy26xcB9nf7aZ2kIQ=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=Smq9ryh7Da7bG1yukJrPQhHxFOImEJl10fYArDt9E4rBE2rPtbk5yuigqBkP+LfSK F0SJO+l0xNeYPys20C8lJtXe+pTlt9heVHaPjKxDapL5RTBcqiRuXqrh+QgvmfMlzQ Z146w2tgcRRGMctBYtPZiV0JzLz9yS74xNJj3qhk=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20160720020057.0a80c3b0@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 02:46:56 -0700
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>, ietf@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: How to get feedback on published RFCs
In-Reply-To: <2c9808c0-7b5f-8e32-c5c0-07f5a6f4521a@tana.it>
References: <578DF452.70107@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20160719051627.0a161790@resistor.net> <2c9808c0-7b5f-8e32-c5c0-07f5a6f4521a@tana.it>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/xSHBHPCRZBnHwb8QJcEqIYpxUUA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:52:19 -0000

Hi Alessandro,
At 10:16 19-07-2016, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>I recall a 2012 occasion[*] where I asked for a better tool than 
>errata held for document revision.

Thanks for reminding me about the tool.  It uses visual cues 
[1].  The person providing feedback about those RFCs was able to get 
feedback about the issues from the editors.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

1. Accessibility considerations.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email