Re: Yang update from IESG ?
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 18 November 2019 13:26 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B16120915; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 05:26:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aED33zchAaIV; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 05:26:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 759FF120059; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 05:26:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [118.201.227.138]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D64B1F450; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 13:26:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 23B1A10EF; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:26:21 +0800 (+08)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, ietf@ietf.org, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Subject: Re: Yang update from IESG ?
In-reply-to: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1911180102380.9256@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1911131435240.22669@bofh.nohats.ca> <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01E70B0061@marchand> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1911180102380.9256@bofh.nohats.ca>
Comments: In-reply-to Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> message dated "Mon, 18 Nov 2019 01:10:48 -0500."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:26:21 +0800
Message-ID: <10541.1574083581@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/xigpsLT7L5o43quY1VgW6tiFrPM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 13:26:28 -0000
Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote: >>> During a plenary at the last or second last IETF, I raised an issue >>> about people stuffing incomplete and obsolete/deprecated partial IANA >>> registiries in yang drafts/RFCs. The IESG confirmed this as a problem >>> to me and one of the IESG members said they were aware and would get >>> back on this. >>> >>> I have not heard anything. The issue is still a problem. Originally, >>> this came up in i2nsf/ipsecme, and has now resurfaced for me in >>> dnsop. >> The IESG talked about this issue during the last IETF meeting. See >> attached. >> >> The outcome of this discussion was that there is no single "right >> answer" and individual ADs should intervene on specific instances as >> appropriate. > Thanks for the answer. Unfortunately, it is not much of guidance and > does not really address the issue I raised, namely that we are putting > snapshots of IANA registries in RFC documents. One of your three Design > Patterns still does this. I also am unhappy with this situation. As far as I can tell it means that IANA will be maintaining YANG modules. I don't understand how this is going to work for real products. -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [ ] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
- RE: Yang update from IESG ? Paul Wouters
- Re: Yang update from IESG ? Ladislav Lhotka
- RE: Yang update from IESG ? Roman Danyliw
- Re: Yang update from IESG ? Michael Richardson
- Re: Yang update from IESG ? Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: Yang update from IESG ? Tim Wicinski
- Re: Yang update from IESG ? Randy Presuhn
- Re: Yang update from IESG ? Lou Berger
- Re: Yang update from IESG ? Michael Richardson
- Re: Yang update from IESG ? Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: Yang update from IESG ? Michael Richardson
- Re: Yang update from IESG ? tom petch
- Re: Yang update from IESG ? Salz, Rich
- Re: Yang update from IESG ? Benoit Claise