IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-liang-iana-pen-06

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Wed, 12 October 2016 05:58 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8B51295BC; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 22:58:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.518
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.518 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SICQgQvWt2Ta; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 22:58:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09F4B129472; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 22:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=886; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1476251903; x=1477461503; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CGilFo2FG7HOlur8NW7YkGy6psP0K04h4j8a5qRk7zM=; b=P7ip/utcYmQt8RHdRYIZ0lLWJ2HLE6ER36pHcq3hV8RQXGmt5D3iyaDS 746zbccmz5JPgDMqrRFAD2yDjJ0ulrZZSvIsclNDhLxcUFsgYR1WcfD4Z 9gqFWXNrRj2nSYBORVW23X36W3P0nhj/rQdiVy8ejoDPQQh2PLQGIRVa9 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AyAgCnz/1X/xbLJq1cGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgzwBAQEBAYEeUo0zlwSUNIIMgmqDNgKCPxQBAgEBAQEBAQFeJ4RiAQEDAThBBQsLRlcHDAYCAQGIRAjDMgEBAQEBAQQBAQEBASOGPYF9gliKJgEEiDSHRIoKj32Bbod7I4VpiSmHTx42QgUHgnMcgVU8NIhkAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,332,1473120000"; d="scan'208";a="649155716"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Oct 2016 05:58:18 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.85] (ams-bclaise-8914.cisco.com [10.60.67.85]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u9C5wITm029980; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 05:58:18 GMT
Subject: Re: draft-liang-iana-pen-06
To: ietf@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
References: <30867.1476032960@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <631b0852-34e7-ce85-cb12-361bbe169a51@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 07:58:20 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <30867.1476032960@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/xkgoy5g8iOh5oOXZsAC55p9S72Q>
Cc: draft-liang-iana-pen@ietf.org, anima-signaling@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 05:58:25 -0000

Michael,

I don't think this draft went as far as the IESG ballot.
I've been following this draft, and asked to AD-sponsored it, but since 
the lead author changed affiliations, I haven't see much progress.

I still believe this is a useful draft.

Regards, Benoit


> What are the plans for  draft-liang-iana-pen ??  The draft expired a year ago
> after a deferred IESG ballot.  was it replaced with another document?  Or did
> NTIA simply derail things?
>
> I read it today as draft-ietf-anima-grasp refers to it, and I happened to
> already have a PEN to use, but wondered if the rules had changed.
>
> The document seems non-controversial and provides a clearly needed amount of
> cleanup in an IANA process.  Will this document proceed?
>
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
>   -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email