IETF Logo Mail Archive

question about draft-irtf-nsrg-report-09.txt

Ronald van der Pol <Ronald.vanderPol@rvdp.org> Thu, 24 April 2003 12:54 UTC

Received: from ran.ietf.org (ran.ietf.org [10.27.6.60]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA14884; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 08:54:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from majordomo by ran.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 198gRu-00078g-00 for ietf-list@ran.ietf.org; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 09:07:38 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([10.27.2.28] helo=ietf.org) by ran.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 198gR2-00074x-00 for ietf@ran.ietf.org; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 09:06:44 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA14643 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 08:44:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 198g7l-0005a7-00 for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 08:46:49 -0400
Received: from kirk.rvdp.org ([80.126.101.63]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 198g7k-0005Zy-00 for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 08:46:49 -0400
Received: (from rvdp@localhost) by kirk.rvdp.org (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) id h3OCl5V24025 for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 14:47:05 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 14:47:05 +0200
From: Ronald van der Pol <Ronald.vanderPol@rvdp.org>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: question about draft-irtf-nsrg-report-09.txt
Message-ID: <20030424124705.GB23217@rvdp.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk

<quote>
4. Conclusions or Questions

   The NSRG was not able to come to unanimity as to whether an
   architectural change is needed.
</quote>

There has been a lot of discussion about the separation of identifiers
and locators (in various forms) on the multi6, ipv6 and ietf lists.
A lot of people seem to think this is in some form needed.

I would like to know the arguments against such a change. I don't
think the document has much text about this. It lists a lot of
questions. But most are more "how" than "why" questions. Are there
many people fundamentally against a change and if so, why?

	rvdp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email