IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Opsdir last call partial review of draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06

<bruno.decraene@orange.com> Mon, 18 September 2017 15:20 UTC

Return-Path: <bruno.decraene@orange.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A0601342BB; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 08:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.619
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.619 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j1cDh_IP_ACC; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 08:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (mta239.mail.business.static.orange.com [80.12.66.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE1681342C0; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 08:20:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfedar03.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.5]) by opfedar25.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 38AC8120A1A; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 17:20:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.31.41]) by opfedar03.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 0E35118006E; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 17:20:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::e92a:c932:907e:8f06]) by OPEXCLILM31.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::2cc9:4bac:7b7d:229d%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 17:20:24 +0200
From: bruno.decraene@orange.com
To: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap.all@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Opsdir last call partial review of draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06
Thread-Topic: Opsdir last call partial review of draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06
Thread-Index: AQHTIMOqXqTtdsQn8EKd6IbHTdyC2qK0rh5Q
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 15:20:24 +0000
Message-ID: <20416_1505748025_59BFE439_20416_32_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A47879394@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <150401028465.13280.5869374542696138659@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <150401028465.13280.5869374542696138659@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.1]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/yfJT9anvz0yGl9eI8P-EHxmjtws>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 15:20:48 -0000

Hi Tim,

Thanks for your review.
As you are correct, your review has been reused by Benoit in his discuss/comments.
In order to avoid duplication of emails/threads, I'll rather (only) answer the thread from Benoit.

Thanks,
Regards,
--Bruno

 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: Tim Wicinski [mailto:tjw.ietf@gmail.com]
 > Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 2:38 PM
 > To: ops-dir@ietf.org
 > Cc: ospf@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap.all@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
 > Subject: Opsdir last call partial review of draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06
 > 
 > 
 > Review is partially done. Another review request has been registered for
 > completing it.
 > 
 > Reviewer: Tim Wicinski
 > Review result: Has Issues
 > 
 > Summary: Almost Ready
 > 
 > The content appears to be fine, but there are some outdated (the biggest one is
 > 5226 replaced by 8126), but its the IANA section which appears the most
 > confusing.
 > 
 > 7.1 OSPF Router Information (RI) Registry -  appears fine
 > 
 > 7.2 OSPF Tunnel Encapsulation Attribute Sub-TLV Registry
 > 
 > This one defines the values being defined/allocated from "This Document" but in
 > Section 5, each Sub-TLV is defined in other documents, so it's totally
 > confusing.


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email