Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-lineid-05.txt> (The Line Identification Destination Option) to Experimental RFC

Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com> Fri, 08 June 2012 20:14 UTC

Return-Path: <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC82011E815B; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 13:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YoLru9adnSTS; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 13:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imr4.ericy.com (imr4.ericy.com [198.24.6.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB7F11E8152; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 13:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eusaamw0711.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.178]) by imr4.ericy.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id q58KED9u009848; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 15:14:37 -0500
Received: from [142.133.112.108] (147.117.20.214) by smtps-am.internal.ericsson.com (147.117.20.178) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.264.0; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 16:14:13 -0400
Message-ID: <4FD25D14.7000207@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 16:14:12 -0400
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-lineid-05.txt> (The Line Identification Destination Option) to Experimental RFC
References: <20120604141855.24802.66473.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E32ED1AC0@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
In-Reply-To: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E32ED1AC0@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: DUREL Sophie OLNC/NAD/TIP <sophie.durel@orange.com>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 20:14:38 -0000

Hi Med,

On 06/06/2012 08:04 AM, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote:
> Dear Suresh, all,
> 
> Even if the document includes several warnings about the unreliability of an RS-based mechanism, I suggest to add a pointer to the following document:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dec-6man-rs-access-harmful-00. 

Is there something in particular that you think is missing from the
lineid draft? The current warning text in lineid (and the
reclassification to experimental) was arrived at after consultations
with the the 6man chairs and the author of draft-dec.

Thanks
Suresh