Re: Proposed Changes to IAOC Communications Plan; Request for Community Input

David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com> Thu, 06 February 2014 04:49 UTC

Return-Path: <dwm@xpasc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D78E61A0277 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 20:49:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.271
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.271 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FH_RANDOM_SURE=0.499, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, GB_I_LETTER=-2, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oINfkHM-uyDS for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 20:49:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from c2w3p-2.abacamail.com (unknown [67.231.154.153]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02BA81A029D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 20:49:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xpasc.com (h-68-164-244-188.snva.ca.megapath.net [68.164.244.188]) by c2w3p-2.abacamail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54E040366 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 04:49:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from egate.xpasc.com (egate.xpasc.com [10.1.2.49]) by xpasc.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s164n1Dn030056 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 20:49:01 -0800
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 20:49:01 -0800
From: David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Proposed Changes to IAOC Communications Plan; Request for Community Input
In-Reply-To: <m28utogah5.wl%randy@psg.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.01.1402052045540.29416@egate.xpasc.com>
References: <20140206004730.12491.71674.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <alpine.LRH.2.01.1402051934590.29416@egate.xpasc.com> <m2bnykgb0u.wl%randy@psg.com> <52F30767.1070401@gmail.com> <m28utogah5.wl%randy@psg.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 04:49:05 -0000

On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Randy Bush wrote:

> >>>> B.  Proposed Additions to the Plan
> >>>>
> >>>> 	5.4.1 Subpoenas and Other Legal Requests
> >>>>
> >>>> 	All subpoenas and other legal requests received by the IAOC
> >>>> 	or the IETF will be published on the IAOC website together
> >>>> 	with their responses.
> >>>>
> >>>> 	Reason for Change:  Greater transparency.
> >>> Some such requests may include the requirement that they not be
> >>> revealed.
> >>
> >> they should be rejected out of hand.  "we can not read your email"
> >
> > Does that work for National Security Letters too?
>
> i was thinking of them specifically.  and yes, i have gone to jail for
> my political beliefs in the past and would do so again.

As an individual, I laud your willingness to do that, but we can't
ask our administrative staff or volunteer leaders to do that as
a matter of policy. Nor do I think we can afford the legal costs
associated with a court battle.