Re: Last Call: <draft-iesg-rfc1150bis-01.txt> (Conclusion of FYI RFC Sub-series) to Informational RFC
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 13 July 2011 14:59 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6BAB11E80FE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:59:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XtfQrrE3HDuD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [208.254.26.82]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F35AC11E808F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:59:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [208.254.26.81]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26920F2409D; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:00:13 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([208.254.26.82]) by localhost (ronin.smetech.net [208.254.26.81]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zh8fnu5GTAj6; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:59:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.100] (pool-96-255-45-210.washdc.fios.verizon.net [96.255.45.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64B80F24031; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:00:12 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-iesg-rfc1150bis-01.txt> (Conclusion of FYI RFC Sub-series) to Informational RFC
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DF22E64.8030401@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:59:46 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F338BE21-F1CA-4712-8B5A-87F95EF79A9B@vigilsec.com>
References: <20110610131840.26851.83855.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4DF22E64.8030401@gmail.com>
To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:59:53 -0000
Mykyta: I don't think this debate has been advanced since the exchange on the rfc-interest list, and my response remains the same. Russ On Jun 10, 2011, at 10:47 AM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote: > Please consider these: http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/2011-June/002518.html and http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/2011-June/002519.html as Last Call comments. Mykyta. > > 10.06.2011 16:18, The IESG wrote: >> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider >> the following document: >> - 'Conclusion of FYI RFC Sub-series' >> <draft-iesg-rfc1150bis-01.txt> as an Informational RFC >> >> [ . . . ]
- Re: Last Call: <draft-iesg-rfc1150bis-01.txt> (Co… Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: Last Call: <draft-iesg-rfc1150bis-01.txt> (Co… Russ Housley