Re: ensuring appropriate discussion on ietf@ietf

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 13 July 2016 11:09 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8965A12DD56 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 04:09:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.187
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.187 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T3UlB2fxMFip for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 04:09:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C277112DD8D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 04:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB0BB2CCB3; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 14:08:57 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BVdx1fzz4dDn; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 14:08:57 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B05A2CC45; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 14:08:57 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Subject: Re: ensuring appropriate discussion on ietf@ietf
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_773813A4-92E8-44F9-A4DA-91D74A462CFE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <00e301d1dcf0$8d44e7a0$a7ceb6e0$@olddog.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:08:56 +0200
Message-Id: <2E626F74-E354-4E78-909A-7CC1FE32B987@piuha.net>
References: <24B9B7EE-FD50-4202-BA50-E813F8288EB4@piuha.net> <00e301d1dcf0$8d44e7a0$a7ceb6e0$@olddog.co.uk>
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/zxbhGuM7aRAWGxqNrweD6uGWAIM>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 11:09:02 -0000

Oops. Seems to be a more generic problem with trac.tools.ietf.org. I’ve raised an issue.

Jari