Re: [Ila] [E] Re: Proposed charter

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Thu, 18 January 2018 18:18 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ila@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ila@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E95B127137 for <ila@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 10:18:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rPMIplPY7cdW for <ila@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 10:18:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95013126C25 for <ila@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 10:18:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id w0IIIB3s005523; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 19:18:11 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B72420B5E7; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 19:18:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A95020B4F7; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 19:18:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [132.166.84.76] ([132.166.84.76]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id w0IIIABg001131; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 19:18:11 +0100
To: Tom Herbert <tom@quantonium.net>
Cc: "Bogineni, Kalyani" <Kalyani.Bogineni@verizonwireless.com>, "ila@ietf.org" <ila@ietf.org>
References: <CAPDqMeqWDdqgrU4UrhCBo0W2kD4CODnPPNJHAC_8LrZXcaoJRw@mail.gmail.com> <372ebd81-b666-31bd-244d-57021d217e63@gmail.com> <cf5dcd54d4204fd9b921a5fcde73be45@scwexch12apd.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com> <9ced56fc-f200-09b3-e81b-201037a25150@gmail.com> <CAPDqMep-SYXjNpbDbFOWJDd-OuX6z9aFyCYXFrLo=hn_PK4j5Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <cbcd9e95-3613-b7c3-4335-cebfc01031c6@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 19:18:10 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPDqMep-SYXjNpbDbFOWJDd-OuX6z9aFyCYXFrLo=hn_PK4j5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ila/2FWJ4VrPzf5MZhXZ73pEW9HUZ0s>
Subject: Re: [Ila] [E] Re: Proposed charter
X-BeenThere: ila@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Identifier Locator Addressing <ila.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ila>, <mailto:ila-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ila/>
List-Post: <mailto:ila@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ila-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ila>, <mailto:ila-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 18:18:15 -0000


Le 18/01/2018 à 17:51, Tom Herbert a écrit :
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 4:45 AM, Alexandre Petrescu
> <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Le 18/01/2018 à 13:33, Bogineni, Kalyani a écrit :
>>>
>>> Alex:
>>>
>>> These two documents provide quite a bit of information on motivation and
>>> use cases.
>>>
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-herbert-intarea-ila/
>>>
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mueller-ila-mobility-03
>>
>>
>> Good!  So the Charter should say this group is working on motivation and
>> use-cases.  It currently doesnt.
>>
> Hi Alexandre,
> 
> It does mention the use cases:
> 
> "The use cases of ILA include mobility, datacenter virtualization, and
> network virtualization; these will be elaborated on by the group."
> 
> I think we want to be careful not to pigeonhole too much on one use
> case

I agree.

> and try to keep the protocol generic for broadest applicability.
> Do you think we need more words here?

Something like "use-cases will be elaborated, including but not limited 
to datacenter, mobility".

> 
>>> Do you see a need for a requirements document?
>>
>>
>> _a_ reqs document?  How many documents to provide is another issue. Maybe
>> start with saying work on one document containing reqs, problem statement,
>> motivation and use-cases.
>>
> Agreed, one document with problem statement/motivation/use cases is
> probably next priority.
> 
> Tom
>