IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ila] [E] Re: review comments on ] draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-00.txt

Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com> Tue, 13 February 2018 01:38 UTC

Return-Path: <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ila@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ila@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A79B12E036; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:38:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Kpw52UvsUze; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:38:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl0-x231.google.com (mail-pl0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA98B12E034; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:38:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl0-x231.google.com with SMTP id v3so5887828plg.3; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:38:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=G3b1rzRRE2Ktm3ZXbNb9Molc+oS4GafpyC3JuoBGlwk=; b=aI5boBLWqg66h28dZrlQvCph2rTyvqCyDG9k0n460h+F9nMAR93Rfh9SZrbC0tkcSG CvX2yl6YsijPtLu6jSrg5+hlq2NcNJlcRV3sePL2LYnXXNrdDr7xMCtXPF89nKYzSH11 FF72ZpMT5iF4bSIkUHLwxYSmLF6WhPhZFzwCe2Eg22SVG8OPl/Zpjar5CaQKPHX9l7Ge bkqRlO+H1aku3H8AKT4pb9PROvcf57j758OIS5AZ++CsOh4W+rPb7CRDg+soccMXZcRL pJpNro0q5AODr7Cx1rg7lil10ZNWSgz4A/ZvYwhfO5n64LGGeeEAh6uznTj4/segJRUe eMAA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=G3b1rzRRE2Ktm3ZXbNb9Molc+oS4GafpyC3JuoBGlwk=; b=P2QCJEOGl/dkpPWG2wq/Mex7f7vRo/NrmY77Fd/lC3Y0300XiAqJ35CID9vfk2/gw6 xiT/79kNG9dRdocDulnT69dhLXzG6PZLCcwJ0zWhG19msxese+VhqFoj6X+qU4w52djT QLEJz/l0QjRuDewmrqWaRcIKViGtpTV69y2EFUt+U1wt9BMR7uJfB7M+JQ3Y2i7sjOup wPo4+dScV3Ah7Xc+GxpaH0l9WiOXL4TNNP8LlHFadM9cOr/GdlvtDd0M9tPZqywbByMf dS4ucTPk8Dk8bEOFEmF+UKoR1QZSqfymZVjcQRVScijGonfs8K/ldCHHHp0kd57ssVKO GudQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPAHpX/wJoAgeZ7qMR6rID+Kp7UPc4uY1OH3Y70SlV0yyFWgi5IQ 1IIHEzTw9D8gR8+7nZ13F+OGyZ5q
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225Jo01Hfj6Pzoljt3y7vpADNqEPIPskPCpjIknfIjZABKZSihQDVo6XIC2Xf+dVdB5ICV8ipw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:5a4a:: with SMTP id f10-v6mr12299592plm.308.1518485887050; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:38:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.207.113.120] ([202.45.12.164]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r2sm22694483pgt.75.2018.02.12.17.38.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:38:05 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
From: Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <b6b5f3a3abcc40cd826656a04d9625be@scwexch12apd.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 10:38:02 +0900
Cc: "ila@ietf.org" <ila@ietf.org>, dmm <dmm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C644435D-F9BC-488B-9A3A-F2E78CD9D438@gmail.com>
References: <15c36020cfea41d0a93331ab4a3c0fdf@scwexch12apd.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com> <B924DE6A-008D-40B4-9FA9-695DF1AEB02E@gmail.com> <d8d6d12f582545ce913284556d259d3b@scwexch12apd.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com> <C9EAC1D6-C37B-45A8-AD84-D0BC0DDFAD4E@gmail.com> <69d06c7ecd624291a868c3bb00cc3e49@scwexch12apd.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com> <D424F84A-7B6D-43D7-A1C8-3ABFB7BE794A@gmail.com> <b6b5f3a3abcc40cd826656a04d9625be@scwexch12apd.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com>
To: "Bogineni, Kalyani" <Kalyani.Bogineni@VerizonWireless.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ila/ORgA_U9Srot-_Ntakb_MicPlyIo>
Subject: Re: [Ila] [E] Re: review comments on ] draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ila@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Identifier Locator Addressing <ila.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ila>, <mailto:ila-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ila/>
List-Post: <mailto:ila@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ila-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ila>, <mailto:ila-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 01:38:09 -0000

Hello Kalyani,

> [..snip..]

> If you mean SRv6 Mobile Uplane draft, it is already a WG document, not my draft. So I’d collect opinions on this from WG. I’m sorry for that.
> As a co-author of the draft, I’m afraid I disagree. SRv6 Mobile Uplane draft specifies SRv6 functions for mobile user plane, which should be architecture agnostic.
> 
> [KB] Sections 7.2, 7.3 refer to 3GPP terminology like eNB, SGW, PGW. My comment was suggesting that you include 5G terminology and CUPS terminology 
> as well so it is clear how your proposal can be used in various scenarios.
> 

Now I’ve got your point. Thank you.


>> 
>> [KB] I am also still not clear if the blue icons (which I think represent IP/MPLS nodes) in your slides are included in SRv6 architecture or not.
> 
> I put some text what those icons indicate. Please find them in the slides. The blue icons represent IPv6 or SRv6 node.
> [KB] Seems like the IPv6/SRv6 nodes do not interact with SMF. Is that the intent? 

IPv6/SRv6 nodes interact with SMF but it’s indirect, is my idea.

Cheers,
--satoru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email