Re: [Ila] ILA BoF at IETF101

Tom Herbert <tom@quantonium.net> Tue, 06 February 2018 03:46 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <88B8E168-928E-47ED-8FB0-06894473F1E5@gmail.com>
References: <88B8E168-928E-47ED-8FB0-06894473F1E5@gmail.com>
From: Tom Herbert <tom@quantonium.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 19:46:36 -0800
Message-ID: <CAPDqMeqe+0jG5s90HYyKBmCsw_3gD3TbtZW4Cu5-tqeAod9x7g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
Cc: ila@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045f4c808644700564830664"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ila/PClWi67dJEvHu-SpwIuvkHHU6sc>
Subject: Re: [Ila] ILA BoF at IETF101
Precedence: list

On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 7:33 PM, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>   We had the IAB+IESG BoF decision call today and the ILA BoF proposal was
> approved as a non-WG-Forming BoF for the London IETF. There is a shared
> belief amongst us that the ILA work needs to address the aspects of
> security, privacy and scalability in order to make further progress. Please
> consider using the time before the IETF meeting to work on these issues. I
> will also be adding idr, rtgwg and rtgarea to the conflict list.
>
> Thanks Suresh!

For purposes of discussion I think we need to cover issues around security,
privacy, and scalability for both data plane and control plane (as well as
across the highlighted use cases where these might have differing
requirements). I will try to marshal an initial set of issues to be looked
at

Tom

Thanks
> Suresh
> _______________________________________________
> ila mailing list
> ila@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ila
>

Re: [Ila] ILA BoF at IETF101 Tom Herbert
[Ila] ILA BoF at IETF101 Suresh Krishnan